These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2223044)

  • 1. Locus of information in words and the right visual field effect.
    Bryden MP; Mondor TA; Loken M; Ingleton MA; Bergstrom K
    Brain Cogn; 1990 Sep; 14(1):44-58. PubMed ID: 2223044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sequential processing in hemispheric word recognition: the impact of initial letter discriminability on the OUP naming effect.
    Lindell AK; Nicholls ME; Kwantes PJ; Castles A
    Brain Lang; 2005 May; 93(2):160-72. PubMed ID: 15781304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Information processing in the cerebral hemispheres: selective hemispheric activation and capacity limitations.
    Hellige JB; Cox PJ; Litvac L
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1979 Jun; 108(2):251-79. PubMed ID: 528905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cerebral dominance and attentional bias in word recognition.
    Leventhal G
    Percept Mot Skills; 1988 Jun; 66(3):791-800. PubMed ID: 3405703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lateralization in the visual perception of Chinese characters and words.
    Cheng CM; Yang MJ
    Brain Lang; 1989 May; 36(4):669-89. PubMed ID: 2720375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating a split fovea model of visual word recognition: effects of case alternation in the two visual fields and in the left and right halves of words presented at the fovea.
    Ellis AW; Brooks J; Lavidor M
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(8):1128-37. PubMed ID: 15817170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What do lateralized displays tell us about visual word perception? A cautionary indication from the word-letter effect.
    Jordan TR; Patching GR
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(11):1504-14. PubMed ID: 15246288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Right hemisphere language processing: lateral difference with imageable and nonimageable ambiguous words.
    Deloche G; Seron X; Scius G; Segui J
    Brain Lang; 1987 Mar; 30(2):197-205. PubMed ID: 3567547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lexical decision after left, right and bilateral presentation of function words, content words and non-words: evidence for interhemispheric interaction.
    Mohr B; Pulvermüller F; Zaidel E
    Neuropsychologia; 1994 Jan; 32(1):105-24. PubMed ID: 8818159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Different methods of lexical access for words presented in the left and right visual hemifields.
    Young AW; Ellis AW
    Brain Lang; 1985 Mar; 24(2):326-58. PubMed ID: 3978409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lateral differences in lexical access: word length vs. stimulus length.
    Bruyer R; Janlin D
    Brain Lang; 1989 Aug; 37(2):258-65. PubMed ID: 2765858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cerebral hemispheric differences in memory of emotional and non-emotional words in normal individuals.
    Nagae S; Moscovitch M
    Neuropsychologia; 2002; 40(9):1601-7. PubMed ID: 11985842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Word matching and lexical decisions: a visual half-field study.
    Brand N; van Bekkum I; Stumpel M; Kroeze JH
    Brain Lang; 1983 Mar; 18(2):199-211. PubMed ID: 6839139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Independent functioning of the two cerebral hemispheres for recognizing bilaterally presented tachistoscopic visual-half-field stimuli.
    Hines D
    Cortex; 1975 Jun; 11(2):132-43. PubMed ID: 1149472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hemisphericity and top-down processing of language.
    Faust M; Kravetz S; Babkoff H
    Brain Lang; 1993 Jan; 44(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 8467373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of word orientation and imageability on visual half-field presentations with a lexical decision task.
    Howell JR; Bryden MP
    Neuropsychologia; 1987; 25(3):527-38. PubMed ID: 3683810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. List constituency and orthographic and phonological processing: a shift to high familiarity words from low familiarity words.
    Rutherford BJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Dec; 65():74-81. PubMed ID: 25455570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating a split processing model of visual word recognition: effects of orthographic neighborhood size.
    Lavidor M; Hayes A; Shillcock R; Ellis AW
    Brain Lang; 2004 Mar; 88(3):312-20. PubMed ID: 14967214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hemispheric asymmetry in recognition memory: effects of retention level on the recognition of Portuguese words.
    Oliveira J; Perea MV; Ladera V; Gamito P
    Int J Psychol; 2011 Apr; 46(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 22044183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Linguistic processes in the two cerebral hemispheres: implications for modularity vs interactionism.
    Faust M; Babkoff H; Kravetz S
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1995 Apr; 17(2):171-92. PubMed ID: 7629266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.