These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22231170)
1. Accuracy of the morphology enabled dipole inversion (MEDI) algorithm for quantitative susceptibility mapping in MRI. Liu T; Xu W; Spincemaille P; Avestimehr AS; Wang Y IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 Mar; 31(3):816-24. PubMed ID: 22231170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Morphology-adaptive total variation for the reconstruction of quantitative susceptibility map from the magnetic resonance imaging phase. Guo L; Mei Y; Guan J; Tan X; Xu Y; Chen W; Feng Q; Feng Y PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0196922. PubMed ID: 29738526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Morphology enabled dipole inversion (MEDI) from a single-angle acquisition: comparison with COSMOS in human brain imaging. Liu T; Liu J; de Rochefort L; Spincemaille P; Khalidov I; Ledoux JR; Wang Y Magn Reson Med; 2011 Sep; 66(3):777-83. PubMed ID: 21465541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rapid two-step dipole inversion for susceptibility mapping with sparsity priors. Kames C; Wiggermann V; Rauscher A Neuroimage; 2018 Feb; 167():276-283. PubMed ID: 29138089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Morphology enabled dipole inversion for quantitative susceptibility mapping using structural consistency between the magnitude image and the susceptibility map. Liu J; Liu T; de Rochefort L; Ledoux J; Khalidov I; Chen W; Tsiouris AJ; Wisnieff C; Spincemaille P; Prince MR; Wang Y Neuroimage; 2012 Feb; 59(3):2560-8. PubMed ID: 21925276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MEDI+0: Morphology enabled dipole inversion with automatic uniform cerebrospinal fluid zero reference for quantitative susceptibility mapping. Liu Z; Spincemaille P; Yao Y; Zhang Y; Wang Y Magn Reson Med; 2018 May; 79(5):2795-2803. PubMed ID: 29023982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Coherence enhancement in quantitative susceptibility mapping by means of anisotropic weighting in morphology enabled dipole inversion. Kee Y; Cho J; Deh K; Liu Z; Spincemaille P; Wang Y Magn Reson Med; 2018 Feb; 79(2):1172-1180. PubMed ID: 28556244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) Algorithms: Mathematical Rationale and Computational Implementations. Kee Y; Liu Z; Zhou L; Dimov A; Cho J; de Rochefort L; Seo JK; Wang Y IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Nov; 64(11):2531-2545. PubMed ID: 28885147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative susceptibility mapping using deep neural network: QSMnet. Yoon J; Gong E; Chatnuntawech I; Bilgic B; Lee J; Jung W; Ko J; Jung H; Setsompop K; Zaharchuk G; Kim EY; Pauly J; Lee J Neuroimage; 2018 Oct; 179():199-206. PubMed ID: 29894829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical feasibility of brain quantitative susceptibility mapping. Zhang S; Liu Z; Nguyen TD; Yao Y; Gillen KM; Spincemaille P; Kovanlikaya I; Gupta A; Wang Y Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jul; 60():44-51. PubMed ID: 30954651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Primal-dual and forward gradient implementation for quantitative susceptibility mapping. Kee Y; Deh K; Dimov A; Spincemaille P; Wang Y Magn Reson Med; 2017 Dec; 78(6):2416-2427. PubMed ID: 28251685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative susceptibility mapping across two clinical field strengths: Contrast-to-noise ratio enhancement at 1.5T. Ippoliti M; Adams LC; Winfried B; Hamm B; Spincemaille P; Wang Y; Makowski MR J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Nov; 48(5):1410-1420. PubMed ID: 29659131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Simulated and experimental phantom data for multi-center quality assurance of quantitative susceptibility maps at 3 T, 7 T and 9.4 T. Gustavo Cuña E; Schulz H; Tuzzi E; Biagi L; Bosco P; García-Fontes M; Mattos J; Tosetti M; Engelmann J; Scheffler K; Hagberg GE Phys Med; 2023 Jun; 110():102590. PubMed ID: 37116389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Background field removal using a region adaptive kernel for quantitative susceptibility mapping of human brain. Fang J; Bao L; Li X; van Zijl PCM; Chen Z J Magn Reson; 2017 Aug; 281():130-140. PubMed ID: 28595120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative susceptibility mapping using multi-channel convolutional neural networks with dipole-adaptive multi-frequency inputs. Si W; Guo Y; Zhang Q; Zhang J; Wang Y; Feng Y Front Neurosci; 2023; 17():1165446. PubMed ID: 37383103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computed inverse resonance imaging for magnetic susceptibility map reconstruction. Chen Z; Calhoun V J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(2):265-74. PubMed ID: 22446372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rapid reconstruction of quantitative susceptibility mapping via improved ℓ Cai C; Chen X; Liu W; Cai S; Zeng D; Ding X Comput Biol Med; 2016 Dec; 79():59-67. PubMed ID: 27744181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Noise Effects in Various Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping Methods. Wang S; Liu T; Chen W; Spincemaille P; Wisnieff C; Tsiouris AJ; Zhu W; Pan C; Zhao L; Wang Y IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2013 Dec; 60(12):3441-8. PubMed ID: 23751950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]