297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22232125)
1. Computer visualizations: factors that influence spatial anatomy comprehension.
Nguyen N; Nelson AJ; Wilson TD
Anat Sci Educ; 2012; 5(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 22232125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How spatial abilities and dynamic visualizations interplay when learning functional anatomy with 3D anatomical models.
Berney S; Bétrancourt M; Molinari G; Hoyek N
Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(5):452-62. PubMed ID: 25689057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. "Let's get physical": advantages of a physical model over 3D computer models and textbooks in learning imaging anatomy.
Preece D; Williams SB; Lam R; Weller R
Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(4):216-24. PubMed ID: 23349117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The relative effectiveness of computer-based and traditional resources for education in anatomy.
Khot Z; Quinlan K; Norman GR; Wainman B
Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(4):211-5. PubMed ID: 23509000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of instructional strategies using cross sections on the recognition of anatomical structures in correlated CT and MR images.
Khalil MK; Paas F; Johnson TE; Su YK; Payer AF
Anat Sci Educ; 2008; 1(2):75-83. PubMed ID: 19177385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Coupled physical and digital cadaver dissection followed by a visual test protocol provides insights into the nature of anatomical knowledge and its evaluation.
Hisley KC; Anderson LD; Smith SE; Kavic SM; Tracy JK
Anat Sci Educ; 2008 Jan; 1(1):27-40. PubMed ID: 19177376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Web-based interactive 3D visualization as a tool for improved anatomy learning.
Petersson H; Sinkvist D; Wang C; Smedby O
Anat Sci Educ; 2009; 2(2):61-8. PubMed ID: 19363804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Role of a computer-generated three-dimensional laryngeal model in anatomy teaching for advanced learners.
Tan S; Hu A; Wilson T; Ladak H; Haase P; Fung K
J Laryngol Otol; 2012 Apr; 126(4):395-401. PubMed ID: 22075619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Design of interactive and dynamic anatomical visualizations: the implication of cognitive load theory.
Khalil MK; Paas F; Johnson TE; Payer AF
Anat Rec B New Anat; 2005 Sep; 286(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 16177992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Experimental evidence for improved neuroimaging interpretation using three-dimensional graphic models.
Ruisoto P; Juanes JA; Contador I; Mayoral P; Prats-Galino A
Anat Sci Educ; 2012; 5(3):132-7. PubMed ID: 22434672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of static and dynamic visualization training approaches for users with different spatial abilities.
Froese ME; Tory M; Evans GW; Shrikhande K
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2013 Dec; 19(12):2810-7. PubMed ID: 24051848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interactive and dynamic visualizations in teaching and learning of anatomy: a cognitive load perspective.
Khalil MK; Paas F; Johnson TE; Payer AF
Anat Rec B New Anat; 2005 Sep; 286(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 16177993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Less is more: development and evaluation of an interactive e-atlas to support anatomy learning.
Guy R; Pisani HR; Rich P; Leahy C; Mandarano G; Molyneux T
Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(2):126-32. PubMed ID: 24816995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Two-dimensional sectioned images and three-dimensional surface models for learning the anatomy of the female pelvis.
Shin DS; Jang HG; Hwang SB; Har DH; Moon YL; Chung MS
Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(5):316-23. PubMed ID: 23463707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Student perceptions of an upper-level, undergraduate human anatomy laboratory course without cadavers.
Wright SJ
Anat Sci Educ; 2012; 5(3):146-57. PubMed ID: 22362500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spatial ability and training in virtual neuroanatomy.
Plumley L; Armstrong R; De Ribaupierre S; Eagleson R
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 184():324-9. PubMed ID: 23400179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of stereoscopic imagery and motion on anatomical structure recognition and visual attention performance.
Remmele M; Schmidt E; Lingenfelder M; Martens A
Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Jan; 11(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 28561952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Virtual cerebral ventricular system: an MR-based three-dimensional computer model.
Adams CM; Wilson TD
Anat Sci Educ; 2011; 4(6):340-7. PubMed ID: 21976457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The use of self-learning modules to facilitate learning of basic science concepts in an integrated medical curriculum.
Khalil MK; Nelson LD; Kibble JD
Anat Sci Educ; 2010; 3(5):219-26. PubMed ID: 20814914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Are all hands-on activities equally effective? Effect of using plastic models, organ dissections, and virtual dissections on student learning and perceptions.
Lombardi SA; Hicks RE; Thompson KV; Marbach-Ad G
Adv Physiol Educ; 2014 Mar; 38(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 24585474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
