These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22232725)
21. A clinical comparison of extraoral panoramic and intraoral radiographic modalities for detecting proximal caries and visualizing open posterior interproximal contacts. Terry GL; Noujeim M; Langlais RP; Moore WS; Prihoda TJ Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150159. PubMed ID: 26869221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A study to determine the added value of 740 screening panoramic radiographs compared to intraoral radiography in the management of adult (>18 years) dentate patients in a primary care setting. Rushton MN; Rushton VE J Dent; 2012 Aug; 40(8):661-9. PubMed ID: 22542499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of two film holders for periapical radiography performed by dental students. Choksi SK; Rao MS MSDA J; 1996; 39(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 9569872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Clarity and diagnostic quality of digitized conventional intraoral radiographs. Goga R; Chandler NP; Love RM Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 15314002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Radiologic study of marginal bone loss around 108 dental implants and its relationship to smoking, implant location, and morphology. Peñarrocha M; Palomar M; Sanchis JM; Guarinos J; Balaguer J Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):861-7. PubMed ID: 15623062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A comparative study of radiographic quality with five periapical techniques in general dental practice. Rushton VE; Horner K Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 Feb; 23(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 8181658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Accuracy of Cone-beam Computed Tomography and Extraoral Bitewings Compared to Intraoral Bitewings in Detection of Interproximal Caries. Felemban OM; Loo CY; Ramesh A J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Dec; 21(12):1361-1367. PubMed ID: 33893259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A new positioning device for extraoral radiography with conventional dental x-ray machines. Schiff TG; McDavid WD Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1985 Jun; 59(6):659-61. PubMed ID: 3859829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Interpretation of chemically created periapical lesions using 2 different dental cone-beam computerized tomography units, an intraoral digital sensor, and conventional film. Ozen T; Kamburoğlu K; Cebeci AR; Yüksel SP; Paksoy CS Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Mar; 107(3):426-32. PubMed ID: 18996725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A comparison of intraoral and extraoral radiological technology. Aker F; Serowski A; Bailey GL Mil Med; 1981 Nov; 146(11):803-6. PubMed ID: 6798506 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of technique errors of intraoral radiographs taken on film v photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates. Zhang W; Huynh CP; Abramovitch K; Leon IL; Arvizu L Tex Dent J; 2012 Jun; 129(6):589-96. PubMed ID: 22866414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of the efficacy of conventional radiography, digital radiography, and ultrasound in diagnosing periapical lesions. Raghav N; Reddy SS; Giridhar AG; Murthy S; Yashodha Devi BK; Santana N; Rakesh N; Kaushik A Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Sep; 110(3):379-85. PubMed ID: 20727498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Patient comfort in periapical examination using digital receptors. Gonçalves A; Wiezel VG; Gonçalves M; Hebling J; Sannomiya EK Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Oct; 38(7):484-8. PubMed ID: 19767521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The use of low-level laser therapy for controlling the gag reflex in children during intraoral radiography. Elbay M; Tak Ö; Şermet Elbay Ü; Kaya C; Eryılmaz K Lasers Med Sci; 2016 Feb; 31(2):355-61. PubMed ID: 26754182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Full-Mouth Intraoral Radiographic Survey in Rabbits. Regalado A; Legendre L J Vet Dent; 2017 Sep; 34(3):190-200. PubMed ID: 28814181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Extraoral bite-wing radiographs: A universally accepted paradox. Johnson KB; Mol A; Tyndall DA J Am Dent Assoc; 2021 Jun; 152(6):444-447. PubMed ID: 34044975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Does digital radiography increase the number of intraoral radiographs? A questionnaire study of Dutch dental practices. Berkhout WE; Sanderink GC; Van der Stelt PF Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Mar; 32(2):124-7. PubMed ID: 12775667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effective and organ doses from scanography and zonography: a comparison with periapical radiography. Ekestubbe A; Thilander-Klang A; Lith A; Gröndahl HG Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 15313999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]