250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22233908)
1. Arsenate removal using a combination treatment of precipitation and nanofiltration.
Chang FF; Liu WJ
Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(2):296-302. PubMed ID: 22233908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Removal of toxic ions (chromate, arsenate, and perchlorate) using reverse osmosis, nanofiltration, and ultrafiltration membranes.
Yoon J; Amy G; Chung J; Sohn J; Yoon Y
Chemosphere; 2009 Sep; 77(2):228-35. PubMed ID: 19679331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Neurotoxic and hepatotoxic cyanotoxins removal by nanofiltration.
Teixeira MR; Rosa MJ
Water Res; 2006 Aug; 40(15):2837-46. PubMed ID: 16839584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Identification of nanofiltration membrane foulants.
Her N; Amy G; Plottu-Pecheux A; Yoon Y
Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):3936-47. PubMed ID: 17572472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Removal of arsenic from water: effect of calcium ions on As(III) removal in the KMnO(4)-Fe(II) process.
Guan X; Ma J; Dong H; Jiang L
Water Res; 2009 Dec; 43(20):5119-28. PubMed ID: 19201439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Arsenate removal from simulated groundwater with a Donnan dialyzer.
Zhao B; Zhao H; Dockko S; Ni J
J Hazard Mater; 2012 May; 215-216():159-65. PubMed ID: 22436343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of silica fouling on the removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes.
Lin YL; Chiou JH; Lee CH
J Hazard Mater; 2014 Jul; 277():102-9. PubMed ID: 24560524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of electrostatic interactions on the rejection with NF and assessment of the removal efficiency during NF/GAC treatment of pharmaceutically active compounds in surface water.
Verliefde AR; Heijman SG; Cornelissen ER; Amy G; Van der Bruggen B; van Dijk JC
Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(15):3227-40. PubMed ID: 17583761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Characterizing algogenic organic matter (AOM) and evaluating associated NF membrane fouling.
Her N; Amy G; Park HR; Song M
Water Res; 2004 Mar; 38(6):1427-38. PubMed ID: 15016519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of operating parameters on the arsenic removal by nanofiltration.
Figoli A; Cassano A; Criscuoli A; Mozumder MS; Uddin MT; Islam MA; Drioli E
Water Res; 2010 Jan; 44(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 19781734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of transmembrane pressure and feed concentration on the retention of arsenic, chromium and cadmium from water by nanofiltration.
Babaee Y; Mousavi SM; Danesh S; Baratian A
J Environ Sci Eng; 2010 Jan; 52(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 21114097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The negative rejection of H+ in NF of carbonate solution and its influences on membrane performance.
Zhu A; Long F; Wang X; Zhu W; Ma J
Chemosphere; 2007 Apr; 67(8):1558-65. PubMed ID: 17250866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Arsenate removal by zero valent iron: batch and column tests.
Biterna M; Arditsoglou A; Tsikouras E; Voutsa D
J Hazard Mater; 2007 Nov; 149(3):548-52. PubMed ID: 17689184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nanofiltration process of glyphosate simulated wastewater.
Liu ZY; Xie M; Ni F; Xu YH
Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(5):816-22. PubMed ID: 22339015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characterisation and application of a novel positively charged nanofiltration membrane for the treatment of textile industry wastewaters.
Cheng S; Oatley DL; Williams PM; Wright CJ
Water Res; 2012 Jan; 46(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 22078250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rejection of pharmaceutically active compounds and endocrine disrupting compounds by clean and fouled nanofiltration membranes.
Yangali-Quintanilla V; Sadmani A; McConville M; Kennedy M; Amy G
Water Res; 2009 May; 43(9):2349-62. PubMed ID: 19303127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The removal of sulphate from mine water by precipitation as ettringite and the utilisation of the precipitate as a sorbent for arsenate removal.
Tolonen ET; Hu T; Rämö J; Lassi U
J Environ Manage; 2016 Oct; 181():856-862. PubMed ID: 27397845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Amino-functionalized MCM-41 and MCM-48 for the removal of chromate and arsenate.
Benhamou A; Basly JP; Baudu M; Derriche Z; Hamacha R
J Colloid Interface Sci; 2013 Aug; 404():135-9. PubMed ID: 23684231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Characteristics of arsenate removal from water by metal-organic frameworks (MOFs).
Li J; Wu YN; Li Z; Zhu M; Li F
Water Sci Technol; 2014; 70(8):1391-7. PubMed ID: 25353945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fouling characteristics of NF and RO operated for removal of dissolved matter from groundwater.
Gwon EM; Yu MJ; Oh HK; Ylee YH
Water Res; 2003 Jul; 37(12):2989-97. PubMed ID: 12767302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
