BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22233908)

  • 21. Enhanced adsorption of arsenate on the aminated fibers: sorption behavior and uptake mechanism.
    Deng S; Yu G; Xie S; Yu Q; Huang J; Kuwaki Y; Iseki M
    Langmuir; 2008 Oct; 24(19):10961-7. PubMed ID: 18771297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A novel application of H2O2-Fe(II) process for arsenate removal from synthetic acid mine drainage (AMD) water.
    Dong H; Guan X; Wang D; Li C; Yang X; Dou X
    Chemosphere; 2011 Nov; 85(7):1115-21. PubMed ID: 21840033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Nanofiltration membrane fouling by oppositely charged macromolecules: investigation on flux behavior, foulant mass deposition, and solute rejection.
    Wang YN; Tang CY
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Oct; 45(20):8941-7. PubMed ID: 21928796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Removal and transport mechanisms of arsenics in UF and NF membrane processes.
    Kim DH; Kim KW; Cho J
    J Water Health; 2006 Jun; 4(2):215-23. PubMed ID: 16813014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of co-existing copper and calcium on the removal of As(V) by reused aluminum oxides.
    Yang JK; Park YJ; Kim KH; Lee HY; Min KC; Lee SM
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 67(1):187-92. PubMed ID: 23128638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Retention of pesticide Endosulfan by nanofiltration: influence of organic matter-pesticide complexation and solute-membrane interactions.
    De Munari A; Semiao AJ; Antizar-Ladislao B
    Water Res; 2013 Jun; 47(10):3484-96. PubMed ID: 23615337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of crude oil on arsenate adsorption on goethite.
    Wainipee W; Weiss DJ; Sephton MA; Coles BJ; Unsworth C; Court R
    Water Res; 2010 Nov; 44(19):5673-83. PubMed ID: 20599240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Characterising humic acid fouling of nanofiltration membranes using bisphenol A as a molecular indicator.
    Nghiem LD; Vogel D; Khan S
    Water Res; 2008 Sep; 42(15):4049-58. PubMed ID: 18678386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Potential of nanofiltration and low pressure reverse osmosis in the removal of phosphorus for aquaculture.
    Leo CP; Yahya MZ; Kamal SN; Ahmad AL; Mohammad AW
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 67(4):831-7. PubMed ID: 23306262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Removal of cyanobacterial metabolites by nanofiltration from two treated waters.
    Dixon MB; Falconet C; Ho L; Chow CW; O'Neill BK; Newcombe G
    J Hazard Mater; 2011 Apr; 188(1-3):288-95. PubMed ID: 21339048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Preparation of three-bore hollow fiber charged nanofiltration membrane for separation of organics and salts.
    Deng J; Zhang Y; Liu J; Zhang H
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(1):171-6. PubMed ID: 22173422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Treatment of membrane concentrates: phosphate removal and reduction of scaling potential.
    Sperlich A; Warschke D; Wegmann C; Ernst M; Jekel M
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(2):301-6. PubMed ID: 20107255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dichloroaniline retention by nanofiltration membranes.
    Causserand C; Aimar P; Cravedi JP; Singlande E
    Water Res; 2005 Apr; 39(8):1594-600. PubMed ID: 15878032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Study of sorption processes and FT-IR analysis of arsenate sorbed onto red muds (a bauxite ore processing waste).
    Castaldi P; Silvetti M; Enzo S; Melis P
    J Hazard Mater; 2010 Mar; 175(1-3):172-8. PubMed ID: 19853993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cyclophosphamide removal from water by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membrane.
    Wang L; Albasi C; Faucet-Marquis V; Pfohl-Leszkowicz A; Dorandeu C; Marion B; Causserand C
    Water Res; 2009 Sep; 43(17):4115-22. PubMed ID: 19592068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Separation of furfural from monosaccharides by nanofiltration.
    Qi B; Luo J; Chen X; Hang X; Wan Y
    Bioresour Technol; 2011 Jul; 102(14):7111-8. PubMed ID: 21570829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Determination of arsenic removal efficiency by ferric ions using response surface methodology.
    Baskan MB; Pala A
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Jul; 166(2-3):796-801. PubMed ID: 19147281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. 3‑Mercapto‑propanoic acid modified cellulose filter paper for quick removal of arsenate from drinking water.
    Pramanik K; Sarkar P; Bhattacharyay D
    Int J Biol Macromol; 2019 Feb; 122():185-194. PubMed ID: 30340008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Arsenate removal from water by a weak-base anion exchange fibrous adsorbent.
    Awual MR; Urata S; Jyo A; Tamada M; Katakai A
    Water Res; 2008 Feb; 42(3):689-96. PubMed ID: 17959217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Can treated municipal wastewater be reused after ozonation and nanofiltration? Results from a pilot study of pharmaceutical removal in Henriksdal WWTP, Sweden.
    Flyborg L; Björlenius B; Persson KM
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(5):1113-20. PubMed ID: 20220232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.