These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22233917)
1. Linking sanitation and wastewater treatment: from evaluation on the basis of effluent pollutant concentrations to evaluation on the basis of pollutant removal efficiencies. Tsuzuki Y Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(2):368-79. PubMed ID: 22233917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of primary sedimentation on full-scale WWTP nutrient removal performance. Puig S; van Loosdrecht MC; Flameling AG; Colprim J; Meijer SC Water Res; 2010 Jun; 44(11):3375-84. PubMed ID: 20430413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Xenobiotic removal efficiencies in wastewater treatment plants: residence time distributions as a guiding principle for sampling strategies. Majewsky M; Gallé T; Bayerle M; Goel R; Fischer K; Vanrolleghem PA Water Res; 2011 Nov; 45(18):6152-62. PubMed ID: 21974873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review. Bal AS; Dhagat NN Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Occurrence and reductions of pharmaceuticals and personal care products and estrogens by municipal wastewater treatment plants in Ontario, Canada. Lishman L; Smyth SA; Sarafin K; Kleywegt S; Toito J; Peart T; Lee B; Servos M; Beland M; Seto P Sci Total Environ; 2006 Aug; 367(2-3):544-58. PubMed ID: 16697441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Anoxic treatment of phenolic wastewater in sequencing batch reactor. Sarfaraz S; Thomas S; Tewari UK; Iyengar L Water Res; 2004 Feb; 38(4):965-71. PubMed ID: 14769416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Estimations of municipal point source pollution in the context of river basin management. Zessner M; Lindtner S Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(9):175-82. PubMed ID: 16445186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Removal efficiency of pharmaceuticals and personal care products with varying wastewater treatment processes and operating conditions - conception of a database and first results. Miège C; Choubert JM; Ribeiro L; Eusèbe M; Coquery M Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 18192740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Treatment performance of a constructed wetland during storm and non-storm events in Korea. Maniquiz MC; Lee SY; Choi JY; Jeong SM; Kim LH Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(1):119-26. PubMed ID: 22173415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of heat recovery from raw wastewater on nitrification and nitrogen removal in activated sludge plants. Wanner O; Panagiotidis V; Clavadetscher P; Siegrist H Water Res; 2005 Nov; 39(19):4725-34. PubMed ID: 16278004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mosquito larvae density and pollutant removal in tropical wetland treatment systems in Honduras. Diemont SA Environ Int; 2006 Apr; 32(3):332-41. PubMed ID: 16126272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pharmaceuticals and personal care products in effluent matrices: A survey of transformation and removal during wastewater treatment and implications for wastewater management. Oulton RL; Kohn T; Cwiertny DM J Environ Monit; 2010 Nov; 12(11):1956-78. PubMed ID: 20938541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance evaluation of biofil toilet waste digester technologies in Ghana: the efficacy of effluent treatment options. Amoah P; Gbenatey Nartey E; Schrecongost A Environ Technol; 2016 Dec; 37(23):3002-13. PubMed ID: 27087485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance assessment of major wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in the state of Georgia. Mines RO; Lackey LW; Behrend GR J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2006; 41(10):2175-98. PubMed ID: 17018407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of AWT systems in the metro Atlanta area. Mines RO; Behrend GR; Holmes Bell G J Environ Manage; 2004 Apr; 70(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 15016439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relevance of the sludge retention time (SRT) as design criteria for wastewater treatment plants for the removal of endocrine disruptors and pharmaceuticals from wastewater. Kreuzinger N; Clara M; Strenn B; Kroiss H Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(5):149-56. PubMed ID: 15497842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of biological wastewater treatment on the molecular weight distribution of soluble organic compounds and on the reduction of BOD, COD and P in pulp and paper mill effluent. Leiviskä T; Nurmesniemi H; Pöykiö R; Rämö J; Kuokkanen T; Pellinen J Water Res; 2008 Aug; 42(14):3952-60. PubMed ID: 18707750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. SHARON process evaluated for improved wastewater treatment plant nitrogen effluent quality. van Kempen R; ten Have CC; Meijer SC; Mulder JW; Duin JO; Uijterlinde CA; van Loosdrecht MC Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(4):55-62. PubMed ID: 16235746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A systematic approach for the comparative assessment of stormwater pollutant removal potentials. Scholes L; Revitt DM; Ellis JB J Environ Manage; 2008 Aug; 88(3):467-78. PubMed ID: 17462814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimization of performance assessment and design characteristics in constructed wetlands for the removal of organic matter. Hijosa-Valsero M; Sidrach-Cardona R; Martín-Villacorta J; Bécares E Chemosphere; 2010 Oct; 81(5):651-7. PubMed ID: 20800869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]