These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22235532)

  • 1. Human performance consequences of automated decision aids in states of sleep loss.
    Reichenbach J; Onnasch L; Manzey D
    Hum Factors; 2011 Dec; 53(6):717-28. PubMed ID: 22235532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Team performance in networked supervisory control of unmanned air vehicles: effects of automation, working memory, and communication content.
    McKendrick R; Shaw T; de Visser E; Saqer H; Kidwell B; Parasuraman R
    Hum Factors; 2014 May; 56(3):463-75. PubMed ID: 24930169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of automated decision aids on performance, operator behaviour and workload in a simulated supervisory control task.
    Röttger S; Bali K; Manzey D
    Ergonomics; 2009 May; 52(5):512-23. PubMed ID: 19296323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Complacency and bias in human use of automation: an attentional integration.
    Parasuraman R; Manzey DH
    Hum Factors; 2010 Jun; 52(3):381-410. PubMed ID: 21077562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of information source, pedigree, and reliability on operator interaction with decision support systems.
    Madhavan P; Wiegmann DA
    Hum Factors; 2007 Oct; 49(5):773-85. PubMed ID: 17915596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Designing automation for human use: empirical studies and quantitative models.
    Parasuraman R
    Ergonomics; 2000 Jul; 43(7):931-51. PubMed ID: 10929828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Displaying contextual information reduces the costs of imperfect decision automation in rapid retasking of ISR assets.
    Rovira E; Cross A; Leitch E; Bonaceto C
    Hum Factors; 2014 Sep; 56(6):1036-49. PubMed ID: 25277015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of imperfect automation on decision making in a simulated command and control task.
    Rovira E; McGarry K; Parasuraman R
    Hum Factors; 2007 Feb; 49(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 17315845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task.
    Endsley MR; Kaber DB
    Ergonomics; 1999 Mar; 42(3):462-92. PubMed ID: 10048306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors affecting performance on a target monitoring task employing an automatic tracker.
    McFadden SM; Vimalachandran A; Blackmore E
    Ergonomics; 2004 Feb; 47(3):257-80. PubMed ID: 14668161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Human Performance Consequences of Automated Decision Aids: The Impact of Time Pressure.
    Rieger T; Manzey D
    Hum Factors; 2022 Jun; 64(4):617-634. PubMed ID: 33111557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adaptive automation of human-machine system information-processing functions.
    Kaber DB; Wright MC; Prinzel LJ; Clamann MP
    Hum Factors; 2005; 47(4):730-41. PubMed ID: 16553062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Supporting trust calibration and the effective use of decision aids by presenting dynamic system confidence information.
    McGuirl JM; Sarter NB
    Hum Factors; 2006; 48(4):656-65. PubMed ID: 17240714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Who's the real expert here? Pedigree's unique bias on trust between human and automated advisers.
    Pearson CJ; Geden M; Mayhorn CB
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Nov; 81():102907. PubMed ID: 31422272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Beyond identity: incorporating system reliability information into an automated combat identification system.
    Neyedli HF; Hollands JG; Jamieson GA
    Hum Factors; 2011 Aug; 53(4):338-55. PubMed ID: 21901932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experience of automation failures in training: effects on trust, automation bias, complacency and performance.
    Sauer J; Chavaillaz A; Wastell D
    Ergonomics; 2016 Jun; 59(6):767-80. PubMed ID: 26374396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influencing Trust for Human-Automation Collaborative Scheduling of Multiple Unmanned Vehicles.
    Clare AS; Cummings ML; Repenning NP
    Hum Factors; 2015 Nov; 57(7):1208-18. PubMed ID: 26060238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of automation reliability on error detection and attention to auditory stimuli in a multi-tasking environment.
    Ferraro JC; Mouloua M
    Appl Ergon; 2021 Feb; 91():103303. PubMed ID: 33176254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of extended lay-off periods on performance and operator trust under adaptable automation.
    Chavaillaz A; Wastell D; Sauer J
    Appl Ergon; 2016 Mar; 53 Pt A():241-51. PubMed ID: 26603139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Impact of Transparency and Decision Risk on Human-Automation Teaming Outcomes.
    Loft S; Bhaskara A; Lock BA; Skinner M; Brooks J; Li R; Bell J
    Hum Factors; 2023 Aug; 65(5):846-861. PubMed ID: 34340583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.