These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22235792)

  • 1. Conventional multi-slice computed tomography (CT) and cone-beam CT (CBCT) for computer-aided implant placement. Part II: reliability of mucosa-supported stereolithographic guides.
    Arisan V; Karabuda ZC; Pişkin B; Özdemir T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Dec; 15(6):907-17. PubMed ID: 22235792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conventional multi-slice computed tomography (CT) and cone-beam CT (CBCT) for computer-assisted implant placement. Part I: relationship of radiographic gray density and implant stability.
    Arisan V; Karabuda ZC; Avsever H; Özdemir T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Dec; 15(6):893-906. PubMed ID: 22251553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of three different types of stereolithographic surgical guide in implant placement: an in vitro study.
    Turbush SK; Turkyilmaz I
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Sep; 108(3):181-8. PubMed ID: 22944314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study.
    Arisan V; Karabuda ZC; Ozdemir T
    J Periodontol; 2010 Jan; 81(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 20059416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants.
    Ersoy AE; Turkyilmaz I; Ozan O; McGlumphy EA
    J Periodontol; 2008 Aug; 79(8):1339-45. PubMed ID: 18672982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical accuracy of 3 different types of computed tomography-derived stereolithographic surgical guides in implant placement.
    Ozan O; Turkyilmaz I; Ersoy AE; McGlumphy EA; Rosenstiel SF
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Feb; 67(2):394-401. PubMed ID: 19138616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study.
    Cushen SE; Turkyilmaz I
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 23566606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A prospective study on the accuracy of mucosally supported stereolithographic surgical guides in fully edentulous maxillae.
    D'haese J; Van De Velde T; Elaut L; De Bruyn H
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):293-303. PubMed ID: 19906267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The reliability of cone-beam computed tomography to assess bone density at dental implant recipient sites: a histomorphometric analysis by micro-CT.
    González-García R; Monje F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):871-9. PubMed ID: 22250839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement Using CBCT-Derived Mucosa-Supported Stereolithographic Template.
    Sun Y; Luebbers HT; Agbaje JO; Schepers S; Politis C; Van Slycke S; Vrielinck L
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Oct; 17(5):862-70. PubMed ID: 24341829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cone Beam Computed Tomography vs Multislice Computed Tomography in Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Assisted Manufacture Guided Implant Surgery Based on Three-Dimensional Optical Scanning and Stereolithographic Guides: Does Image Modality Matter?
    Widmann G; Fischer B; Berggren JP; Dennhardt A; Schullian P; Reto B; Puelacher W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(3):527-33. PubMed ID: 27183061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT-derived template-based implant placement.
    Behneke A; Burwinkel M; Behneke N
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 22092586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy and complications of computer-designed selective laser sintering surgical guides for flapless dental implant placement and immediate definitive prosthesis installation.
    Di Giacomo GA; da Silva JV; da Silva AM; Paschoal GH; Cury PR; Szarf G
    J Periodontol; 2012 Apr; 83(4):410-9. PubMed ID: 21819249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In Vivo Accuracy of Implant Placement Using a Full Digital Planning Modality and Stereolithographic Guides.
    Skjerven H; Riis UH; Herlofsson BB; Ellingsen JE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):124-132. PubMed ID: 30695088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correlation between bone density and angular deviation of implants placed using CT-generated surgical guides.
    Ozan O; Orhan K; Turkyilmaz I
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Sep; 22(5):1755-61. PubMed ID: 21959426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of a newly developed cone-beam computerized tomography-aided surgical guidance system for dental implant placement: an ex vivo study.
    Murat S; Kamburoğlu K; Özen T
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Dec; 38(6):706-12. PubMed ID: 21767205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro comparison of guided versus freehand implant placement: use of a new combined TRIOS surface scanning, Implant Studio, CBCT, and stereolithographic virtually planned and guided technique.
    Tan PLB; Layton DM; Wise SL
    Int J Comput Dent; 2018; 21(2):87-95. PubMed ID: 29967901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implant surgery using bone- and mucosa-supported stereolithographic guides in totally edentulous jaws: surgical and post-operative outcomes of computer-aided vs. standard techniques.
    Arisan V; Karabuda CZ; Ozdemir T
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Sep; 21(9):980-8. PubMed ID: 20497439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of Surgical Template on the Accuracy of Implant Placement.
    Xu LW; You J; Zhang JX; Liu YF; Peng W
    J Prosthodont; 2016 Dec; 25(8):641-646. PubMed ID: 26619380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy assessment of cone beam computed tomography-derived laboratory-based surgical templates on partially edentulous patients.
    Behneke A; Burwinkel M; Knierim K; Behneke N
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Feb; 23(2):137-143. PubMed ID: 21443593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.