These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22236660)

  • 1. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: temporary phenomenon or a new consolidated technique.
    Moreno Sierra J; Ortiz Oshiro E; Chavez Roa C; Silmi Moyano A
    Urol Int; 2012; 88(2):245-6. PubMed ID: 22236660
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robotic approaches to prolapse surgery.
    Rosenblum N
    Curr Opin Urol; 2012 Jul; 22(4):292-6. PubMed ID: 22647648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.
    White WM; Pickens RB; Elder RF; Firoozi F
    Urol Clin North Am; 2014 Nov; 41(4):549-57. PubMed ID: 25306166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Symptomatic and anatomic 1-year outcomes after robotic and abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
    Siddiqui NY; Geller EJ; Visco AG
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 May; 206(5):435.e1-5. PubMed ID: 22397900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for management of pelvic organ prolapse enhances quality of life at one year: a prospective observational study.
    Perez T; Crochet P; Descargues G; Tribondeau P; Soffray F; Gadonneix P; Loundou A; Baumstarck-Barrau K
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(6):747-54. PubMed ID: 22024261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy/sacrocervicopexy repair of pelvic organ prolapse: initial experience.
    Göçmen A; Sanlıkan F; Uçar MG
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Mar; 285(3):683-8. PubMed ID: 21818575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sacrocolpopexy for treatment of vaginal apical prolapse: evidence-based surgery.
    Parkes IL; Shveiky D
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(4):546-57. PubMed ID: 24462593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prolapse surgery: which technique and when?
    Heesakkers JP; Vierhout ME
    Curr Opin Urol; 2011 Jul; 21(4):281-5. PubMed ID: 21537192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Abdominal approaches to pelvic prolapse repairs.
    Pollard ME; Eilber KS; Anger JT
    Curr Opin Urol; 2013 Jul; 23(4):306-11. PubMed ID: 23673511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-minimization analysis of robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
    Judd JP; Siddiqui NY; Barnett JC; Visco AG; Havrilesky LJ; Wu JM
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(4):493-9. PubMed ID: 20621010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [How I do... Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy].
    Friederich L; Le Tohic A; Panel P
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2013 Dec; 41(12):743-5. PubMed ID: 24268993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robotic/Laparoscopic prolapse repair and the role of hysteropexy: a urology perspective.
    Burgess KL; Elliott DS
    Urol Clin North Am; 2012 Aug; 39(3):349-60. PubMed ID: 22877718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is robotic sacrocolpopexy a marketing gimmick or a technological advancement?
    Kim JH; Anger JT
    Curr Opin Urol; 2010 Jul; 20(4):280-4. PubMed ID: 21475070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A systematic review and meta-analysis of conventional laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
    Pan K; Zhang Y; Wang Y; Wang Y; Xu H
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Mar; 132(3):284-91. PubMed ID: 26797199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robotic vs abdominal sacrocolpopexy: 44-month pelvic floor outcomes.
    Geller EJ; Parnell BA; Dunivan GC
    Urology; 2012 Mar; 79(3):532-6. PubMed ID: 22386392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Review of extraperitoneal sacrocolpopexy as a technique for advanced uterine and vault prolapse.
    Onol FF; Onol SY
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Aug; 24(4):253-8. PubMed ID: 22614674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Revision sacrocolpopexy: tips and tricks for optimal outcomes.
    Omosigho U; Paraiso MFR; Chang OH
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Mar; 34(3):783-785. PubMed ID: 36181549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [A retrospective analysis comparing colposuspension and retropubic mid-urethral sling as preventive anti-incontinence measures during laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy].
    Palomba S; Oppedisano R; Materazzo C; Albano A; Condorelli M; Dicello A; Napolitano V; Zullo F
    Minerva Ginecol; 2011 Apr; 63(2):171-80. PubMed ID: 21508905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Update on laparoscopic, robotic, and minimally invasive vaginal surgery for pelvic floor repair.
    Ross JW; Preston MR
    Minerva Ginecol; 2009 Jun; 61(3):173-86. PubMed ID: 19415062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Advances in urogynaecological robotic surgery.
    Swan K; Advincula AP
    BJU Int; 2011 Sep; 108(6 Pt 2):1024-7. PubMed ID: 21917106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.