358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22236702)
1. Virtual non-contrast in second-generation, dual-energy computed tomography: reliability of attenuation values.
Toepker M; Moritz T; Krauss B; Weber M; Euller G; Mang T; Wolf F; Herold CJ; Ringl H
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Mar; 81(3):e398-405. PubMed ID: 22236702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tin-filter enhanced dual-energy-CT: image quality and accuracy of CT numbers in virtual noncontrast imaging.
Kaufmann S; Sauter A; Spira D; Gatidis S; Ketelsen D; Heuschmid M; Claussen CD; Thomas C
Acad Radiol; 2013 May; 20(5):596-603. PubMed ID: 23490736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Image fusion in dual energy computed tomography for detection of various anatomic structures--effect on contrast enhancement, contrast-to-noise ratio, signal-to-noise ratio and image quality.
Paul J; Bauer RW; Maentele W; Vogl TJ
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):612-9. PubMed ID: 21376494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Incidental Findings in Abdominal Dual-Energy Computed Tomography: Correlation Between True Noncontrast and Virtual Noncontrast Images Considering Renal and Liver Cysts and Adrenal Masses.
Slebocki K; Kraus B; Chang DH; Hellmich M; Maintz D; Bangard C
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2017; 41(2):294-297. PubMed ID: 27759598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative attenuation accuracy of virtual non-enhanced imaging compared to that of true non-enhanced imaging on dual-source dual-energy CT.
Javadi S; Elsherif S; Bhosale P; Jensen CT; Layman RR; Jacobsen MC; Le O; Jia S; Parikh RJ; Tamm EP
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Apr; 45(4):1100-1109. PubMed ID: 32052130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing Arterial- and Venous-Phase Acquisition for Optimization of Virtual Noncontrast Images From Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Angiography.
Lehti L; Söderberg M; Höglund P; Wassélius J
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2019; 43(5):770-774. PubMed ID: 31425308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Spectral detector CT-derived virtual non-contrast images: comparison of attenuation values with unenhanced CT.
Ananthakrishnan L; Rajiah P; Ahn R; Rassouli N; Xi Y; Soesbe TC; Lewis MA; Lenkinski RE; Leyendecker JR; Abbara S
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Mar; 42(3):702-709. PubMed ID: 28084546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dual-energy CT in the assessment of mediastinal lymph nodes: comparative study of virtual non-contrast and true non-contrast images.
Yoo SY; Kim Y; Cho HH; Choi MJ; Shim SS; Lee JK; Baek SY
Korean J Radiol; 2013; 14(3):532-9. PubMed ID: 23690725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dual-layer spectral computed tomography: Virtual non-contrast in comparison to true non-contrast images.
Sauter AP; Muenzel D; Dangelmaier J; Braren R; Pfeiffer F; Rummeny EJ; Noël PB; Fingerle AA
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Jul; 104():108-114. PubMed ID: 29857855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relationships of clinical protocols and reconstruction kernels with image quality and radiation dose in a 128-slice CT scanner: study with an anthropomorphic and water phantom.
Paul J; Krauss B; Banckwitz R; Maentele W; Bauer RW; Vogl TJ
Eur J Radiol; 2012 May; 81(5):e699-703. PubMed ID: 21316888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Attenuation values of renal parenchyma in virtual noncontrast images acquired from multiphase renal dual-energy CT: Comparison with standard noncontrast CT.
Lin YM; Chiou YY; Wu MH; Huang SS; Shen SH
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Apr; 101():103-110. PubMed ID: 29571782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of true unenhanced and virtual unenhanced (VUE) attenuation values in abdominopelvic single-source rapid kilovoltage-switching spectral CT.
Borhani AA; Kulzer M; Iranpour N; Ghodadra A; Sparrow M; Furlan A; Tublin ME
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Mar; 42(3):710-717. PubMed ID: 27864600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The importance of spectral separation: an assessment of dual-energy spectral separation for quantitative ability and dose efficiency.
Krauss B; Grant KL; Schmidt BT; Flohr TG
Invest Radiol; 2015 Feb; 50(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 25373305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliability of virtual non-contrast computed tomography angiography: comparing it with the real deal.
Lehti L; Söderberg M; Höglund P; Nyman U; Gottsäter A; Wassélius J
Acta Radiol Open; 2018 Jul; 7(7-8):2058460118790115. PubMed ID: 30181911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Abdominal Organs Attenuation Values and Abdominal Aortic Calcifications on Virtual and True Noncontrast Images Obtained With Third-Generation Dual-Source Dual-Energy Computed Tomography.
Kim S; Kang BS; Kwon WJ; Bang M; Lim S; Park GM; Lee TY
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2020; 44(4):490-500. PubMed ID: 32697520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Virtual unenhanced CT images acquired from dual-energy CT urography: accuracy of attenuation values and variation with contrast material phase.
Sahni VA; Shinagare AB; Silverman SG
Clin Radiol; 2013 Mar; 68(3):264-71. PubMed ID: 22974566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Virtual non-contrast for evaluation of liver parenchyma and vessels: results from 25 patients using multi-phase spectral-detector CT.
Laukamp KR; Ho V; Obmann VC; Herrmann K; Gupta A; Borggrefe J; Lennartz S; Große Hokamp N; Ramaiya N
Acta Radiol; 2020 Aug; 61(8):1143-1152. PubMed ID: 31856581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Virtual non-contrast dual-energy CT compared to single-energy CT of the urinary tract: a prospective study.
Lundin M; Lidén M; Magnuson A; Mohammed AA; Geijer H; Andersson T; Persson A
Acta Radiol; 2012 Jul; 53(6):689-94. PubMed ID: 22798385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Single-energy non-contrast hepatic steatosis criteria applied to virtual non-contrast images: is it still highly specific and positively predictive?
Haji-Momenian S; Parkinson W; Khati N; Brindle K; Earls J; Zeman RK
Clin Radiol; 2018 Jun; 73(6):594.e7-594.e15. PubMed ID: 29526439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of an advanced image-based technique to calculate virtual monoenergetic computed tomographic images from a dual-energy examination to improve contrast-to-noise ratio in examinations using iodinated contrast media.
Grant KL; Flohr TG; Krauss B; Sedlmair M; Thomas C; Schmidt B
Invest Radiol; 2014 Sep; 49(9):586-92. PubMed ID: 24710203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
