These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2223672)

  • 1. [Coronal filling biomaterials. Criteria for selection].
    Degrange M
    Real Clin; 1990 Jan; 1(1):9-26. PubMed ID: 2223672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conservative indirect restorations for posterior teeth. Cast versus bonded ceramic.
    Donovan TE; Chee WW
    Dent Clin North Am; 1993 Jul; 37(3):433-43. PubMed ID: 8348996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modern alternatives to amalgam: cementable restorations and inlays.
    Wirz J; Jaeger K
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Aug; 30(8):551-6. PubMed ID: 10635268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bonding of amalgam restorations: existing knowledge and future prospects.
    Setcos JC; Staninec M; Wilson NH
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 11203798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Marginal seal comparisons between resin-bonded Class II porcelain inlays, posterior composite restorations, and direct composite resin inlays.
    Shortall AC; Baylis RL; Baylis MA; Grundy JR
    Int J Prosthodont; 1989; 2(3):217-23. PubMed ID: 2699418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Metal-resin bonding.
    McConnell RJ
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 1993 Jun; 21(6):38-42. PubMed ID: 7692006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of bonded amalgam restorations on microleakage.
    Al-Jazairy YH; Louka AN
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(4):203-9. PubMed ID: 10823065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fluoride-releasing resin bonding of amalgam restorations in primary teeth: in vitro secondary caries effect.
    Hicks J; Milano M; Seybold S; García-Godoy F; Flaitz C
    Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):361-4. PubMed ID: 12691270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Materials for conservative posterior restorations.
    Donovan TE; Cho GC
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 1996 Sep; 24(9):32-8. PubMed ID: 9120610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Complete sealing of dental cavities].
    Davidson CL
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1990 Mar; 97(3):114-7. PubMed ID: 2096308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biocompatibility of a flowable composite bonded with a self-etching adhesive compared with a glass lonomer cement and a high copper amalgam.
    Shimada Y; Seki Y; Sasafuchi Y; Arakawa M; Burrow MF; Otsuki M; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 14753328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative microleakage evaluation around amalgam restorations with different treatments on cavity walls.
    de Morais PM; Rodrigues Júnior AL; Pimenta LA
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(4):217-22. PubMed ID: 10823067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interfacial gaps following ceramic inlay cementation vs direct composites.
    Iida K; Inokoshi S; Kurosaki N
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 12877431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Re-treatment decisions for failed posterior fillings by Finnish general practitioners.
    Heinikainen M; Vehkalahti M; Murtomaa H
    Community Dent Health; 2002 Jun; 19(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 12146589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling.
    Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M; Theodoridou-Pahini S; Papadogiannis Y; Karezis A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Placement technique for direct posterior composite restorations.
    Javaheri DS
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 13(3):195-200; quiz 202. PubMed ID: 11360766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Direct composite or bonded porcelain: a clinical choice for anterior aesthetics.
    Dunn J
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 1994 Apr; 22(4):73-6, 78, 80-1 passim. PubMed ID: 8598528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.