These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Clinical evaluation of anterior restorative materials. Sockwell C Dent Clin North Am; 1976 Apr; 20(2):403-22. PubMed ID: 767176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Management of extensive carious lesions in permanent molars of a child with nonmetallic bonded restorations--a case report. el-Mowafy O J Can Dent Assoc; 2000 Jun; 66(6):302-7. PubMed ID: 10927895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The influence of a packable resin composite, conventional resin composite and amalgam on molar cuspal stiffness. Molinaro JD; Diefenderfer KE; Strother JM Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):516-24. PubMed ID: 12216572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Microleakage of direct filling materials in Class V restorations using thermal cycling. Bauer JG; Henson JL Quintessence Int; 1985 Nov; 16(11):765-9. PubMed ID: 3866258 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Criteria for substituting amalgam with composite resins. Roulet JF; Noack MJ Int Dent J; 1991 Aug; 41(4):195-205. PubMed ID: 1917075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Cumulative effects of successive restorative procedures on anterior crown flexure: intact versus veneered incisors. Magne P; Douglas WH Quintessence Int; 2000 Jan; 31(1):5-18. PubMed ID: 11203907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Endodontic complications after plastic restorations in general practice. Whitworth JM; Myers PM; Smith J; Walls AW; McCabe JF Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):409-16. PubMed ID: 15910477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. An in vitro study of coronal microleakage around bonded amalgam coronal-radicular cores in endodontically treated molar teeth. Howdle MD; Fox K; Youngson CC Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 11887532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Microleakage of direct and indirect composite restorations with three dentin bonding agents. Alavi AA; Kianimanesh N Oper Dent; 2002; 27(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 11817466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Predictable cementation of esthetic restorations: part II--selection criteria and guidelines for implementation. Quintas AF Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2007 Oct; 19(9):7-9. PubMed ID: 18038716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Composite or amalgam? Not a black or white decision]. Roeters FJ; Opdam NJ; Burgersdijk RC Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1992 Oct; 99(10):371-4. PubMed ID: 11820006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Survey of general dentists regarding posterior restorations, selection criteria, and associated clinical problems. Haj-Ali R; Walker MP; Williams K Gen Dent; 2005; 53(5):369-75; quiz 376, 367-8. PubMed ID: 16252541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of finishing time and techniques on marginal sealing ability of two composite restorative materials. Lopes GC; Franke M; Maia HP J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 12239477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Total bonding vs selective bonding: marginal adaptation of Class 2 composite restorations. Thonemann B; Federlin M; Schmalz G; Grundler W Oper Dent; 1999; 24(5):261-71. PubMed ID: 10823072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations. Krämer N; Lohbauer U; Frankenberger R Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):60D-76D. PubMed ID: 11763920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]