These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22237008)

  • 1. Effects of age-related differences in empathy on social economic decision-making.
    Beadle JN; Paradiso S; Kovach C; Polgreen L; Denburg NL; Tranel D
    Int Psychogeriatr; 2012 May; 24(5):822-33. PubMed ID: 22237008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Aging, empathy, and prosociality.
    Beadle JN; Sheehan AH; Dahlben B; Gutchess AH
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2015 Mar; 70(2):215-24. PubMed ID: 24115776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Examination of social decision making in patients with schizophrenia using ultimatum game.
    Patil VA; Jacob AA; Chacko DM; Chakrabarti D; Devi P; Thonse U; Kumar V; Varambally S; Venkatasubramanian G; Rao NP
    Asian J Psychiatr; 2020 Apr; 50():101937. PubMed ID: 32109802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prosocial behavior in aging: which factors can explain age-related differences in social-economic decision making?
    Rosi A; Nola M; Lecce S; Cavallini E
    Int Psychogeriatr; 2019 Dec; 31(12):1747-1757. PubMed ID: 30782235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Age-related differences in social economic decision making: the ultimatum game.
    Bailey PE; Ruffman T; Rendell PG
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2013 May; 68(3):356-63. PubMed ID: 22929390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Altered economic decision-making in abstinent heroin addicts: Evidence from the ultimatum game.
    Hou Y; Zhao L; Yao Q; Ding L
    Neurosci Lett; 2016 Aug; 627():148-54. PubMed ID: 27264486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Age-related changes in social decision-making: An electrophysiological analysis of unfairness evaluation in the Ultimatum Game.
    Fernandes C; Gonçalves AR; Pasion R; Ferreira-Santos F; Barbosa F; Martins IP; Marques-Teixeira J
    Neurosci Lett; 2019 Jan; 692():122-126. PubMed ID: 30391319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Age, but not education, affects social decision-making in the ultimatum game paradigm.
    Cassimiro L; Cecchini MA; Cipolli GC; Yassuda MS
    Arq Neuropsiquiatr; 2024 Jul; 82(7):1-9. PubMed ID: 38955212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk, reward, and economic decision making in aging.
    Roalf DR; Mitchell SH; Harbaugh WT; Janowsky JS
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2012 May; 67(3):289-98. PubMed ID: 21926401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Empathy leads to fairness.
    Page KM; Nowak MA
    Bull Math Biol; 2002 Nov; 64(6):1101-16. PubMed ID: 12508533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceived relative social status and cognitive load influence acceptance of unfair offers in the Ultimatum Game.
    Harris A; Young A; Hughson L; Green D; Doan SN; Hughson E; Reed CL
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227717. PubMed ID: 31917806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Irrational economic decision-making after ventromedial prefrontal damage: evidence from the Ultimatum Game.
    Koenigs M; Tranel D
    J Neurosci; 2007 Jan; 27(4):951-6. PubMed ID: 17251437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The neural basis of economic decision-making in the Ultimatum Game.
    Sanfey AG; Rilling JK; Aronson JA; Nystrom LE; Cohen JD
    Science; 2003 Jun; 300(5626):1755-8. PubMed ID: 12805551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preference and strategy in proposer's prosocial giving in the ultimatum game.
    Inaba M; Inoue Y; Akutsu S; Takahashi N; Yamagishi T
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193877. PubMed ID: 29505587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The price of racial bias: intergroup negotiations in the ultimatum game.
    Kubota JT; Li J; Bar-David E; Banaji MR; Phelps EA
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Dec; 24(12):2498-504. PubMed ID: 24121413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Social economic decision-making across the lifespan: An fMRI investigation.
    Harlé KM; Sanfey AG
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jun; 50(7):1416-24. PubMed ID: 22414593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Taking it easy when playing ultimatum game with a Down syndrome proposer: Effects on behavior and medial frontal negativity.
    Rêgo GG; Campanhã C; do Egito JHT; Boggio PS
    Soc Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 12(5):530-540. PubMed ID: 27237685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impaired social cognition in schizophrenia during the Ultimatum Game: An EEG study.
    Horat SK; Favre G; Prévot A; Ventura J; Herrmann FR; Gothuey I; Merlo MCG; Missonnier P
    Schizophr Res; 2018 Feb; 192():308-316. PubMed ID: 28578921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pro-inflammatory cytokine predicts reduced rejection of unfair financial offers.
    Ohira H; Osumi T; Matsunaga M; Yamakawa K
    Neuro Endocrinol Lett; 2013; 34(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 23524623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Response time in economic games reflects different types of decision conflict for prosocial and proself individuals.
    Yamagishi T; Matsumoto Y; Kiyonari T; Takagishi H; Li Y; Kanai R; Sakagami M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Jun; 114(24):6394-6399. PubMed ID: 28559334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.