These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. The obligatory effects of memory on eye movements. Ryan JD; Hannula DE; Cohen NJ Memory; 2007 Jul; 15(5):508-25. PubMed ID: 17613794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Recognition memory strength is predicted by pupillary responses at encoding while fixation patterns distinguish recollection from familiarity. Kafkas A; Montaldi D Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Oct; 64(10):1971-89. PubMed ID: 21838656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using eye movement measures to investigate effects of age on memory for objects in a scene. Shih SI; Meadmore KL; Liversedge SP Memory; 2012; 20(6):629-37. PubMed ID: 22731743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Curvature and the visual perception of shape: theory on information along object boundaries and the minima rule revisited. Lim IS; Leek EC Psychol Rev; 2012 Jul; 119(3):668-77. PubMed ID: 22059900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Eye fixation-related potentials (EFRPs) during object identification. Rämä P; Baccino T Vis Neurosci; 2010 Nov; 27(5-6):187-92. PubMed ID: 20939937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effects of viewing angle, camera angle, and sign of surface curvature on the perception of three-dimensional shape from texture. Todd JT; Thaler L; Dijkstra TM; Koenderink JJ; Kappers AM J Vis; 2007 Sep; 7(12):9.1-16. PubMed ID: 17997651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Erratum to "Information limitations in perception of shape from texture". [Vision Research 41 (2001) 1519-1534]. Li A; Zaidi Q Vision Res; 2001 Oct; 41(22):2927-42. PubMed ID: 11701185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does gravity matter? Effects of semantic and syntactic inconsistencies on the allocation of attention during scene perception. Võ ML; Henderson JM J Vis; 2009 Mar; 9(3):24.1-15. PubMed ID: 19757963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Systematic perceptual distortion of 3D slant by disconjugate eye movements. Li HC Vision Res; 2006 Jul; 46(15):2328-35. PubMed ID: 16515799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Object recognition using metric shape. Lee YL; Lind M; Bingham N; Bingham GP Vision Res; 2012 Sep; 69():23-31. PubMed ID: 22884632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Information limitations in perception of shape from texture. Li A; Zaidi Q Vision Res; 2001 May; 41(12):1519-33. PubMed ID: 11343719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Haptic curvature comparison of convex and concave shapes. van der Horst BJ; Kappers AM Perception; 2008; 37(8):1137-51. PubMed ID: 18853551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characteristics of eye movements in 3-D object learning: comparison between within-modal and cross-modal object recognition. Ueda Y; Saiki J Perception; 2012; 41(11):1289-98. PubMed ID: 23513616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection of convexity and concavity in context. Bertamini M J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):775-89. PubMed ID: 18665725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contour curvature polarity and surface interpolation. Fantoni C; Bertamini M; Gerbino W Vision Res; 2005 Apr; 45(8):1047-62. PubMed ID: 15695189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]