These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22238214)

  • 1. When and why do retrieval attempts enhance subsequent encoding?
    Grimaldi PJ; Karpicke JD
    Mem Cognit; 2012 May; 40(4):505-13. PubMed ID: 22238214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pretesting boosts recognition, but not cued recall, of targets from unrelated word pairs.
    Seabrooke T; Mitchell CJ; Wills AJ; Hollins TJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Feb; 28(1):268-273. PubMed ID: 32959192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Testing the myth of the encoding-retrieval match.
    Goh WD; Lu SH
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Jan; 40(1):28-39. PubMed ID: 21830162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attempting to answer a meaningful question enhances subsequent learning even when feedback is delayed.
    Kornell N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):106-14. PubMed ID: 23855547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Making related errors facilitates learning, but learners do not know it.
    Huelser BJ; Metcalfe J
    Mem Cognit; 2012 May; 40(4):514-27. PubMed ID: 22161209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Encoding specificity revisited: the role of semantics.
    Hannon B; Craik FI
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2001 Sep; 55(3):231-43. PubMed ID: 11605558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attempted prime retrieval is a double-edged sword: Facilitation and disruption in repeated lexical retrieval.
    Kumar AA; Balota DA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Aug; 46(8):1505-1532. PubMed ID: 32134316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Conditions of highly specific learning through cued recall.
    Pan SC; Lovelett J; Stoeckenius D; Rickard TC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Apr; 26(2):634-640. PubMed ID: 30937830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The benefit of retrieval practice on cued recall under stress depends on item difficulty.
    Klier C; Buratto LG
    Neurosci Lett; 2023 Feb; 797():137066. PubMed ID: 36642238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. ERP correlates of intentional forgetting.
    Mecklinger A; Parra M; Waldhauser GT
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1255():132-47. PubMed ID: 19103178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reconsolidation from negative emotional pictures: is successful retrieval required?
    Finn B; Roediger HL; Rosenzweig E
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Oct; 40(7):1031-45. PubMed ID: 22477237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Selective access in cued recall: the roles of retrieval cues and domains of encoding.
    McEvoy CL; Nelson DL
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Jan; 18(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 2314223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Context change and retrieval difficulty in the list-before-last paradigm.
    Sahakyan L; Hendricks HE
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Aug; 40(6):844-60. PubMed ID: 22391953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Competitive Semantic Memory Retrieval: Temporal Dynamics Revealed by Event-Related Potentials.
    Hellerstedt R; Johansson M
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0150091. PubMed ID: 26901865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are judgments of learning made after correct responses during retrieval practice sensitive to lag and criterion level effects?
    Pyc MA; Rawson KA
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Aug; 40(6):976-88. PubMed ID: 22399224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Immediate judgments of learning are insensitive to implicit interference effects at retrieval.
    Eakin DK; Hertzog C
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Jan; 40(1):8-18. PubMed ID: 21915761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improvement of encoding and retrieval in normal and pathological aging with word-picture paradigm.
    Iodice R; Meilán JJ; Carro J
    Aging Ment Health; 2015; 19(10):940-6. PubMed ID: 25560063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of episodic context in retrieval practice effects.
    Whiffen JW; Karpicke JD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1036-1046. PubMed ID: 28080119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retrieval attempts enhance learning regardless of time spent trying to retrieve.
    Vaughn KE; Hausman H; Kornell N
    Memory; 2017 Mar; 25(3):298-316. PubMed ID: 27078516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The two processes underlying the testing effect- Evidence from Event-Related Potentials (ERPs).
    Liu XL; Tan DH; Reder LM
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Apr; 112():77-85. PubMed ID: 29474894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.