183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22238432)
21. Performance characteristics of two real-time PCR assays for the quantification of Epstein-Barr virus DNA.
Hill CE; Harris SB; Culler EE; Zimring JC; Nolte FS; Caliendo AM
Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 May; 125(5):665-71. PubMed ID: 16707366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of commercial real-time PCR assays for quantification of Epstein-Barr virus DNA.
Ruiz G; Peña P; de Ory F; Echevarría JE
J Clin Microbiol; 2005 May; 43(5):2053-7. PubMed ID: 15872221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Analytical and Clinical Performance of the NeuMoDx™ Platform for Cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr Virus Viral Load Testing.
Coupland L; Woodward K; Dervisevic S; Hale R; Brolly S
Viruses; 2024 Apr; 16(5):. PubMed ID: 38793553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of various blood compartments and reporting units for the detection and quantification of Epstein-Barr virus in peripheral blood.
Hakim H; Gibson C; Pan J; Srivastava K; Gu Z; Bankowski MJ; Hayden RT
J Clin Microbiol; 2007 Jul; 45(7):2151-5. PubMed ID: 17494720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Epstein Barr viral load monitoring in mononuclear lymphocytes and serum of renal transplant recipients using a quantitative PCR protocol].
Merlino C; Giacchino F; Bergallo M; Bonello F; Bollero C; Segoloni GP; Cavallo R
G Ital Nefrol; 2003; 20(2):170-5. PubMed ID: 12746803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of two nucleic acid extraction and testing systems for HCMV-DNA detection and quantitation on whole blood specimens from transplant patients.
Costa C; Mantovani S; Balloco C; Sidoti F; Fop F; Cavallo R
J Virol Methods; 2013 Nov; 193(2):579-82. PubMed ID: 23924805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Analytical and clinical evaluation of the cobas Epstein-Barr virus test at a tertiary care cancer hospital.
Lee C; Lim Y; Saintine D; Babady NE
J Clin Virol; 2024 Aug; 173():105680. PubMed ID: 38728796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of two automated real-time PCR-based quantification methods for whole blood Epstein-Barr viral load.
Vancutsem E; Crombé F; Soetens O; Wautier M; Dördelmann C; Piérard D; Wybo I; Demuyser T
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2024 Feb; 108(2):116101. PubMed ID: 38016384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Measurement of Epstein-Barr virus DNA load using a novel quantification standard containing two EBV DNA targets and SYBR Green I dye.
Lay ML; Lucas RM; Ratnamohan M; Taylor J; Ponsonby AL; Dwyer DE;
Virol J; 2010 Sep; 7():252. PubMed ID: 20860842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of serum and whole blood levels of cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus DNA.
Kullberg-Lindh C; Olofsson S; Brune M; Lindh M
Transpl Infect Dis; 2008 Oct; 10(5):308-15. PubMed ID: 18466193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. High Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA loads in HIV-infected patients: correlation with antiretroviral therapy and quantitative EBV serology.
Stevens SJ; Blank BS; Smits PH; Meenhorst PL; Middeldorp JM
AIDS; 2002 May; 16(7):993-1001. PubMed ID: 11953465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparative evaluation of three automated systems for DNA extraction in conjunction with three commercially available real-time PCR assays for quantitation of plasma Cytomegalovirus DNAemia in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients.
Bravo D; Clari MÁ; Costa E; Muñoz-Cobo B; Solano C; José Remigia M; Navarro D
J Clin Microbiol; 2011 Aug; 49(8):2899-904. PubMed ID: 21697323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Multicenter evaluation of prototype real-time PCR assays for Epstein-Barr virus and cytomegalovirus DNA in whole blood samples from transplant recipients.
Ito Y; Takakura S; Ichiyama S; Ueda M; Ando Y; Matsuda K; Hidaka E; Nakatani K; Nishioka J; Nobori T; Kajiyama N; Kimura H
Microbiol Immunol; 2010 Sep; 54(9):516-22. PubMed ID: 20840150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of commercial and in-house Real-time PCR assays for quantification of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA in plasma.
Perandin F; Cariani E; Pollara CP; Manca N
BMC Microbiol; 2007 Mar; 7():22. PubMed ID: 17391518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of four commercial extraction-quantification systems to monitor EBV or CMV viral load in whole blood.
Baron A; Gicquel A; Plantier JC; Gueudin M
J Clin Virol; 2019 Apr; 113():39-44. PubMed ID: 30870646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparative Evaluation of Four Real-Time PCR Methods for the Quantitative Detection of Epstein-Barr Virus from Whole Blood Specimens.
Buelow D; Sun Y; Tang L; Gu Z; Pounds S; Hayden R
J Mol Diagn; 2016 Jul; 18(4):527-34. PubMed ID: 27157323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Quantification of Epstein-Barr virus DNA is helpful for evaluation of chronic active Epstein-Barr virus infection.
Sakamoto Y; Mariya Y; Kubo K
Tohoku J Exp Med; 2012 Aug; 227(4):307-11. PubMed ID: 22850617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Prospective Epstein-Barr virus-related post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder prevention program in pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant: virological monitoring and first-line treatment.
Chiereghin A; Prete A; Belotti T; Gibertoni D; Piccirilli G; Gabrielli L; Pession A; Lazzarotto T
Transpl Infect Dis; 2016 Feb; 18(1):44-54. PubMed ID: 26574232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of Whole Blood and Plasma for Monitoring Cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr Virus.
Fukuda Y; Torii Y; Iwata KI; Haruta K; Yamaguchi M; Suzuki T; Narita A; Muramatsu H; Ogura Y; Takahashi Y; Ito Y; Kawada JI
New Microbiol; 2024 May; 47(1):52-59. PubMed ID: 38700884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of quantitative competitive PCR with LightCycler-based PCR for measuring Epstein-Barr virus DNA load in clinical specimens.
Stevens SJ; Verkuijlen SA; Brule AJ; Middeldorp JM
J Clin Microbiol; 2002 Nov; 40(11):3986-92. PubMed ID: 12409363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
