These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Enhancement and human nature: the case of Sandel. Lewens T J Med Ethics; 2009 Jun; 35(6):354-6. PubMed ID: 19482977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Amplio, Ergo Sum. Lawrence DR Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2018 Oct; 27(4):686-697. PubMed ID: 30198468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cochlear Implantation, Enhancements, Transhumanism and Posthumanism: Some Human Questions. Lee J Sci Eng Ethics; 2016 Feb; 22(1):67-92. PubMed ID: 25962718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Deciphering dignity. Henry LM Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jul; 10(7):59-61. PubMed ID: 20582835 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Human nature: an oxymoron? Heyd D J Med Philos; 2003 Apr; 28(2):151-69. PubMed ID: 12943212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Human dignity and transhumanism: do anthro-technological devices have moral status? Jotterand F Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jul; 10(7):45-52. PubMed ID: 20582831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Dignity and agential realism: human, posthuman, and nonhuman. Glenn LM; Dvorsky G Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jul; 10(7):57-8. PubMed ID: 20582834 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Transhumanism, metaphysics, and the posthuman god. Bishop JP J Med Philos; 2010 Dec; 35(6):700-20. PubMed ID: 21088098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The hermeneutic challenge of genetic engineering: Habermas and the transhumanists. Edgar A Med Health Care Philos; 2009 Jun; 12(2):157-67. PubMed ID: 19219641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. From Darwinian to technological evolution: forgetting the human lottery. Tintino G Cuad Bioet; 2014; 25(85):387-95. PubMed ID: 25684379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Is there a problem with enhancement? Kamm FM Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(3):5-14. PubMed ID: 16006376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The perils of failing to enhance: a response to Persson and Savulescu. Fenton E J Med Ethics; 2010 Mar; 36(3):148-51. PubMed ID: 20211993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Enhancement technologies and the modern self. Elliott C J Med Philos; 2011 Aug; 36(4):364-74. PubMed ID: 21903906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [The enhanced medication: The use of medicine in transhumanistic discourses and its social meanings]. Le Dévédec N; Collin J J Int Bioethique Ethique Sci; 2018; 29(3):93-108. PubMed ID: 30767463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Response to open peer commentaries on "Human dignity and transhumanism: do anthro-technological devices have moral status?". Jotterand F Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jul; 10(7):W6-8. PubMed ID: 20582817 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Why Should We Become Posthuman? The Beneficence Argument Questioned. Pablo Vaccari A J Med Philos; 2019 Mar; 44(2):192-219. PubMed ID: 30877776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Enhancements, easy shortcuts, and the richness of human activities. Schermer M Bioethics; 2008 Aug; 22(7):355-63. PubMed ID: 18445089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Limits to human enhancement: nature, disease, therapy or betterment? Hofmann B BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Oct; 18(1):56. PubMed ID: 29017486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]