These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2223976)

  • 1. [Effect of static magnetic fields on biosignal processing in humans].
    von Klitzing L
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1990; 35 Suppl 2():17-9. PubMed ID: 2223976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Adaptative procedures for pre-processing of evoked potentials].
    Hoyer D; Griessbach G; Witte H; Schack B
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1990 Nov; 35(11):263-70. PubMed ID: 2073537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Transcranial magnetic stimulation: early and late responses].
    Zangemeister WH; Stoppel S; Faust U
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1990; 35 Suppl 3():166-8. PubMed ID: 2078680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Effect of a static 0.2 Tesla magnetic field on somatosensory evoked potentials and the EEG arousal spectrum in periodic stimulation of the median nerve].
    Timm C; von Klitzing L
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1990; 35 Suppl 2():63-4. PubMed ID: 2224029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contaminative and informative role of non-cerebral components in EEG.
    Zalewska E
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 120(5):841-2. PubMed ID: 19362051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Complex adaptive estimation algorithms in biosignal processing].
    Steuer D; Griessbach G
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1997; 42 Suppl():21-2. PubMed ID: 9517029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Artefact-free electrodes for studying electric activity of the brain of laboratory animals exposed to electromagnetic fields].
    Varetskiĭ VV; Galich LN; Davidenko AV; D'iachenko VN; Engovatov VV
    Gig Sanit; 1986 May; (5):73-4. PubMed ID: 3721222
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A commentary on brain-computer interfacing and its impact on rehabilitation science and clinical applicability.
    Robinson CJ
    IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng; 2000 Jun; 8(2):161-3. PubMed ID: 10896177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Evoked potentials and intracranial pressure--experiences from the neurosurgical viewpoint].
    Schwerdtfeger K; Steudel WI
    Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 1997 Sep; 32(2 Suppl):S255-9. PubMed ID: 9417239
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Magnetosensory evoked potentials: consistent nonlinear phenomena.
    Carrubba S; Frilot C; Chesson AL; Webber CL; Zbilut JP; Marino AA
    Neurosci Res; 2008 Jan; 60(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 18036693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Continuous current source inversion of evoked potential fields in a spherical model head.
    Srebro R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1994 Nov; 41(11):997-1003. PubMed ID: 8002000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A fully integrated mixed-signal neural processor for implantable multichannel cortical recording.
    Sodagar AM; Wise KD; Najafi K
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Jun; 54(6 Pt 1):1075-88. PubMed ID: 17554826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Constitutional peculiarities of the bioelectric activity of the brain].
    Kusnezowa SM; Kudrizkaja OW
    Z Gerontol; 1990; 23(1):56-8. PubMed ID: 2327148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Effect of a static 0.2 T magnetic field on the EEG power spectrum in periodic median nerve stimulation].
    von Klitzing L; Tessmann G
    EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb; 1989 Mar; 20(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 2539963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Weighted averaging of weak neuronal magnetic fields with reference to covariance of strong noise components].
    Burghoff M; Gräbe T; Steinhoff U; Mackert BM; Curio G; Trahms L
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1997; 42 Suppl():191-2. PubMed ID: 9517108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of time-variant coherence as a general tool for analysis of interrelations between brain electrical processes.
    Witte H; Arnold M; Miltner W; Rosburg T; Schelenz C
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1999; 68():374-9. PubMed ID: 10724910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [A measuring model in the evaluation of EEG trend analysis in coma conditions and in determining sleep stages].
    Laux HJ; Schulz P
    Anaesthesiol Reanim; 1988; 13(4):227-9. PubMed ID: 3166675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The SCP is not specific enough to represent conscious content.
    Koch C
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2009 Sep; 13(9):367; author reply 368-9. PubMed ID: 19709920
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Technology and equipment review. Evoked potential instrumentation.
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 1992 Oct; 9(4):526-33. PubMed ID: 1464679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Trimmed estimators for robust averaging of event-related potentials.
    Leonowicz Z; Karvanen J; Shishkin SL
    J Neurosci Methods; 2005 Mar; 142(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 15652613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.