These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22239921)

  • 21. Parametric finite element analysis of physical stimuli resulting from mechanical stimulation of tissue engineered cartilage.
    Babalola OM; Bonassar LJ
    J Biomech Eng; 2009 Jun; 131(6):061014. PubMed ID: 19449968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Can sulci protect the brain from traumatic injury?
    Ho J; Kleiven S
    J Biomech; 2009 Sep; 42(13):2074-80. PubMed ID: 19679308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Implant biomechanics in grafted sinus: a finite element analysis.
    Fanuscu MI; Vu HV; Poncelet B
    J Oral Implantol; 2004; 30(2):59-68. PubMed ID: 15119454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Finite element analysis studies of a metal-ceramic crown on a first premolar tooth.
    Proos KA; Swain MV; Ironside J; Steven GP
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):521-7. PubMed ID: 12475155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of implant abutment type on stress distribution in bone under various loading conditions using finite element analysis.
    Chun HJ; Shin HS; Han CH; Lee SH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 16634489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Measurement of brain simulant strains in head surrogate under impact loading.
    Singh A; Ganpule SG; Khan MK; Iqbal MA
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2021 Dec; 20(6):2319-2334. PubMed ID: 34455505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of implant diameter, insertion depth, and loading angle on stress/strain fields in implant/jawbone systems: finite element analysis.
    Qian L; Todo M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):877-86. PubMed ID: 19865628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of heel-pad thickness and loading protocol on measured heel-pad stiffness and a standardized protocol for inter-subject comparability.
    Spears IR; Miller-Young JE
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Feb; 21(2):204-12. PubMed ID: 16289518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Effect of change in occlusal contact areas of the mandibular second molar on temporomandibular joint stress distribution: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis].
    Zhang Y; Wang MQ; Ling W
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Jul; 40(4):291-3. PubMed ID: 16191369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Design and finite-element evaluation of a versatile assembled lumbar interbody fusion cage.
    Ding JY; Qian S; Wan L; Huang B; Wang LG; Zhou Y
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2010 Apr; 130(4):565-71. PubMed ID: 20140621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An examination of the stress distribution in a soft-lined acrylic resin mandibular complete denture by finite element analysis.
    Shim JS; Watts DC
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 11203603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Interface parameters of impact-induced mild traumatic brain injury.
    Fijalkowski RJ; Ellingson BM; Stemper BD; Yoganandan N; Gennarelli TA; Pintar FA
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2006; 42():108-13. PubMed ID: 16817594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The contour of cementless femoral stem has minor effect on initial periprosthetic von Mises stress distribution. A 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Hu KZ; Zhang XL; Wang CT; Ji WT
    Saudi Med J; 2009 Jul; 30(7):947-51. PubMed ID: 19618013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A finite element model of region-specific response for mild diffuse brain injury.
    Fijalkowski RJ; Yoganandan N; Zhang J; Pintar FA
    Stapp Car Crash J; 2009 Nov; 53():193-213. PubMed ID: 20058555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A comparison of three-dimensional finite element stress analysis with in vitro strain gauge measurements on dental implants.
    Akça K; Cehreli MC; Iplikçioglu H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 11951799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Biodynamic finite element models used in brain injury research.
    Ward CC; Nikravesh PE; Thompson RB
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1978 Jan; 49(1 Pt. 2):136-42. PubMed ID: 623576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Modeling masticatory muscle force in finite element analysis: sensitivity analysis using principal coordinates analysis.
    Ross CF; Patel BA; Slice DE; Strait DS; Dechow PC; Richmond BG; Spencer MA
    Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol; 2005 Apr; 283(2):288-99. PubMed ID: 15747351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Quantitative T2 mapping as a potential marker for the initial assessment of the severity of damage after traumatic brain injury in rat.
    Kharatishvili I; Sierra A; Immonen RJ; Gröhn OH; Pitkänen A
    Exp Neurol; 2009 May; 217(1):154-64. PubMed ID: 19416663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A three-dimensional human head finite element model and power flow in a human head subject to impact loading.
    Zong Z; Lee HP; Lu C
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(2):284-92. PubMed ID: 16321630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The use of finite element analysis to model bone-implant contact with basal implants.
    Ihde S; Goldmann T; Himmlova L; Aleksic Z
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jul; 106(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 18439855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.