85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22239972)
1. Effect of visual displays and locations on laparoscopic surgical training task.
Rogers ML; Heath WB; Uy CC; Suresh S; Kaber DB
Appl Ergon; 2012 Jul; 43(4):762-7. PubMed ID: 22239972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Boot cAMP: educational outcomes after 4 successive years of preparatory simulation-based training at onset of internship.
Fernandez GL; Page DW; Coe NP; Lee PC; Patterson LA; Skylizard L; St Louis M; Amaral MH; Wait RB; Seymour NE
J Surg Educ; 2012; 69(2):242-8. PubMed ID: 22365874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Task performance and eye activity: predicting behavior relating to cognitive workload.
Tsai YF; Viirre E; Strychacz C; Chase B; Jung TP
Aviat Space Environ Med; 2007 May; 78(5 Suppl):B176-85. PubMed ID: 17547318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic arm enhancement to accommodate improved efficiency and decreased resource utilization in complex minimally invasive surgical procedures.
Geis WP; Kim HC; Brennan EJ; McAfee PC; Wang Y
Stud Health Technol Inform; 1996; 29():471-81. PubMed ID: 10172847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is associated with poorer performance and increased surgeon workload compared with standard laparoscopy.
Montero PN; Acker CE; Heniford BT; Stefanidis D
Am Surg; 2011 Jan; 77(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 21396310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mental workload and cognitive task automaticity: an evaluation of subjective and time estimation metrics.
Liu Y; Wickens CD
Ergonomics; 1994 Nov; 37(11):1843-54. PubMed ID: 8001525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Higher mental workload is associated with poorer laparoscopic performance as measured by the NASA-TLX tool.
Yurko YY; Scerbo MW; Prabhu AS; Acker CE; Stefanidis D
Simul Healthc; 2010 Oct; 5(5):267-71. PubMed ID: 21330808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effectiveness of laparoscopic computer simulator versus usage of box trainer for endoscopic surgery training of novices.
Diesen DL; Erhunmwunsee L; Bennett KM; Ben-David K; Yurcisin B; Ceppa EP; Omotosho PA; Perez A; Pryor A
J Surg Educ; 2011; 68(4):282-9. PubMed ID: 21708364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of training on two laparoscopic simulators and assessment of skills transfer to surgical performance.
Youngblood PL; Srivastava S; Curet M; Heinrichs WL; Dev P; Wren SM
J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Apr; 200(4):546-51. PubMed ID: 15804468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Psychomotor skills assessment in practicing surgeons experienced in performing advanced laparoscopic procedures.
Gallagher AG; Smith CD; Bowers SP; Seymour NE; Pearson A; McNatt S; Hananel D; Satava RM
J Am Coll Surg; 2003 Sep; 197(3):479-88. PubMed ID: 12946803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hands-free administration of subjective workload scales: acceptability in a surgical training environment.
Carswell CM; Lio CH; Grant R; Klein MI; Clarke D; Seales WB; Strup S
Appl Ergon; 2010 Dec; 42(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 20630495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Training surgical skills using nonsurgical tasks--can Nintendo Wii™ improve surgical performance?
Boyle E; Kennedy AM; Traynor O; Hill AD
J Surg Educ; 2011; 68(2):148-54. PubMed ID: 21338974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surgeon-tool force/torque signatures--evaluation of surgical skills in minimally invasive surgery.
Rosen J; MacFarlane M; Richards C; Hannaford B; Sinanan M
Stud Health Technol Inform; 1999; 62():290-6. PubMed ID: 10538374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Utilization of a cognitive task analysis for laparoscopic appendectomy to identify differentiated intraoperative teaching objectives.
Smink DS; Peyre SE; Soybel DI; Tavakkolizadeh A; Vernon AH; Anastakis DJ
Am J Surg; 2012 Apr; 203(4):540-5. PubMed ID: 22325336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cutting errors in surgery: experience limits underestimation bias in a simulated surgical environment.
Malhotra N; Poolton JM; Wilson MR; Masters RS
J Surg Educ; 2012; 69(4):473-6. PubMed ID: 22677584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of using laparoscopic instruments on muscle activation patterns during minimally invasive surgical training procedures.
Quick NE; Gillette JC; Shapiro R; Adrales GL; Gerlach D; Park AE
Surg Endosc; 2003 Mar; 17(3):462-5. PubMed ID: 12399872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task.
Endsley MR; Kaber DB
Ergonomics; 1999 Mar; 42(3):462-92. PubMed ID: 10048306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Target detection performance in helmet-mounted and conventional dome displays.
Hettinger LJ; Nelson WT; Haas MW
Int J Aviat Psychol; 1996; 6(4):321-34. PubMed ID: 11540400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Monitor height affects surgeons' stress level and performance on minimally invasive surgery tasks.
Smith WD; Berguer R; Nguyen NT
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2005; 111():498-501. PubMed ID: 15718786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cervicobrachial muscle response to cognitive load in a dual-task scenario.
Leyman E; Mirka G; Kaber D; Sommerich C
Ergonomics; 2004 May; 47(6):625-45. PubMed ID: 15204291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
