199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22240271)
21. A prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular lingual retainer survival.
Taner T; Aksu M
Eur J Orthod; 2012 Aug; 34(4):470-4. PubMed ID: 21508264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Survival of bonded lingual retainers with chemical or photo polymerization over a 2-year period: a single-center, randomized controlled clinical trial.
Pandis N; Fleming PS; Kloukos D; Polychronopoulou A; Katsaros C; Eliades T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 23910197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Clinical effectiveness of 2 orthodontic retainer wires on mandibular arch retention.
Gunay F; Oz AA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Feb; 153(2):232-238. PubMed ID: 29407500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Multistranded wire bonded retainers: from start to success.
Zachrisson BU
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Nov; 148(5):724-7. PubMed ID: 26522030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of Bond Strength and Adhesive Remnant Index of Different Lingual Retainers in Human Incisor Teeth.
Sowmya C; Brahmini P; Thimmaiah MK; Thakkar R; Kumar S; Naik MK
J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2024 Feb; 16(Suppl 1):S276-S278. PubMed ID: 38595395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. What causes failure of fixed orthodontic retention? - systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies.
Jedliński M; Grocholewicz K; Mazur M; Janiszewska-Olszowska J
Head Face Med; 2021 Jul; 17(1):32. PubMed ID: 34301280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Debonding force and deformation of two multi-stranded lingual retainer wires bonded to incisor enamel: an in vitro study.
Cooke ME; Sherriff M
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Dec; 32(6):741-6. PubMed ID: 20547494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A bonding technique for fixed maxillary retainers.
Patcas R; Pedroli G
J Orthod; 2012 Dec; 39(4):317-22. PubMed ID: 23269696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Stability and failure rate during 3 years of fixed retention: A follow-up of an randomized clinical trial on adolescents with four different lingual retainers.
Çokakoğlu S; Adanur-Atmaca R; Çakır M; Öztürk F
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2024 Apr; 27(2):251-258. PubMed ID: 37786933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A comprehensive survey of retention procedures in Australia and New Zealand.
Wong PM; Freer TJ
Aust Orthod J; 2004 Nov; 20(2):99-106. PubMed ID: 16429880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. In vitro comparison of the torsional load transfer of various commercially available stainless-steel wires used for fixed retainers in orthodontics.
Engeler OG; Dalstra M; Arnold DT; Steineck M; Verna C
J Orthod; 2021 Jun; 48(2):118-126. PubMed ID: 33231109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Different lingual retainer composites and the microleakage between enamel-composite and wire-composite interfaces.
Uysal T; Ulker M; Baysal A; Usumez S
Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):941-6. PubMed ID: 18298203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparative assessment of relapse and failure between CAD/CAM stainless steel and standard stainless steel fixed retainers in orthodontic retention patients.
Shim H; Foley P; Bankhead B; Kim KB
Angle Orthod; 2022 Jan; 92(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 34464438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. In-vitro assessment of the forces generated by lingual fixed retainers.
Sifakakis I; Pandis N; Eliades T; Makou M; Katsaros C; Bourauel C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jan; 139(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 21195275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Bonded orthodontic retainers: a review.
Bearn DR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Aug; 108(2):207-13. PubMed ID: 7625397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Breakage incidence with direct-bonded lingual retainers.
Lumsden KW; Saidler G; McColl JH
Br J Orthod; 1999 Sep; 26(3):191-4. PubMed ID: 10532157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Clinical comparison of a multistranded wire and a direct-bonded polyethylene-reinforced resin composite used for lingual retention.
Winkler D
Quintessence Int; 2004 May; 35(5):348; author reply 349. PubMed ID: 15130072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Clinical comparison of a multistranded wire and a direct-bonded polyethylene-reinforced resin composite used for lingual retention.
Rudo DN
Quintessence Int; 2004 May; 35(5):348; author reply 349. PubMed ID: 15130071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Periodontal effects and survival rates of different mandibular retainers: comparison of bonding technique and wire thickness.
Gökçe B; Kaya B
Eur J Orthod; 2019 Nov; 41(6):591-600. PubMed ID: 31365926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effectiveness of lingual retainers bonded to the canines in preventing mandibular incisor relapse.
Renkema AM; Al-Assad S; Bronkhorst E; Weindel S; Katsaros C; Lisson JA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Aug; 134(2):179e1-8. PubMed ID: 18675196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
