These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22240770)

  • 1. Assessment of aortic root dimensions in patients with suspected Marfan syndrome: intraindividual comparison of contrast-enhanced and non-contrast magnetic resonance angiography with echocardiography.
    Bannas P; Groth M; Rybczynski M; Sheikhzadeh S; von Kodolitsch Y; Graessner J; Lund G; Adam G; Habermann CR
    Int J Cardiol; 2013 Jul; 167(1):190-6. PubMed ID: 22240770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Cine-MRI and Transthoracic Echocardiography for the Assessment of Aortic Root Diameters in Patients with Suspected Marfan Syndrome.
    Bannas P; Rybczynski M; Sheikhzadeh S; von Kodolitsch Y; Derlin T; Yamamura J; Lund G; Adam G; Groth M
    Rofo; 2015 Nov; 187(11):1022-8. PubMed ID: 26098252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exact monitoring of aortic diameters in Marfan patients without gadolinium contrast: intraindividual comparison of 2D SSFP imaging with 3D CE-MRA and echocardiography.
    Veldhoen S; Behzadi C; Derlin T; Rybczinsky M; von Kodolitsch Y; Sheikhzadeh S; Henes FO; Bley TA; Adam G; Bannas P
    Eur Radiol; 2015 Mar; 25(3):872-82. PubMed ID: 25316057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability of non-contrast magnetic resonance angiography-derived aortic diameters in Marfan patients: comparison of inner vs. outer vessel wall measurements.
    Weinrich JM; Avanesov M; Lenz A; Tahir E; Henes FO; Schoennagel BP; Rybczinsky M; Adam G; von Kodolitsch Y; Bannas P
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Aug; 36(8):1533-1542. PubMed ID: 32314122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of aortic diameter in Marfan patients: intraindividual comparison of 3D-Dixon and 2D-SSFP magnetic resonance imaging.
    Wright F; Warncke M; Sinn M; Ristow I; Lenz A; Riedel C; Schoennagel BP; Zhang S; Kaul MG; Adam G; von Kodolitsch Y; Sehner S; Bannas P
    Eur Radiol; 2023 Mar; 33(3):1687-1697. PubMed ID: 36269370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intraindividual comparison of 1.5 T and 3 T non-contrast MR angiography for monitoring of aortic root diameters in Marfan patients.
    Avanesov M; Weinrich JM; Sinn M; Lenz A; von Düring F; Salamon J; Henes FO; Schönnagel BP; Adam G; von Kodolitsch Y; Bannas P
    Int J Cardiol; 2021 Aug; 337():119-126. PubMed ID: 33933510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Thoracic aorta diameters in Marfan patients: Intraindividual comparison of 3D modified relaxation-enhanced angiography without contrast and triggering (REACT) with transthoracic echocardiography.
    Gietzen C; Pennig L; von Stein J; Guthoff H; Weiss K; Gertz R; Thürbach I; Bunck AC; Maintz D; Baldus S; Ten Freyhaus H; Hohmann C; von Stein P
    Int J Cardiol; 2023 Nov; 390():131203. PubMed ID: 37480997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of native high-resolution 3D and contrast-enhanced MR angiography for assessing the thoracic aorta.
    von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F; Gruettner H; Trauzeddel RF; Greiser A; Schulz-Menger J
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Jun; 15(6):651-8. PubMed ID: 24399340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dilation of peripheral vessels in Marfan syndrome: importance of thoracoabdominal MR angiography.
    Mariucci EM; Lovato L; Rosati M; Palena LM; Bonvicini M; Fattori R
    Int J Cardiol; 2013 Sep; 167(6):2928-31. PubMed ID: 22954416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Non-contrast MR angiography at 1.5 Tesla for aortic monitoring in Marfan patients after aortic root surgery.
    Veldhoen S; Behzadi C; Lenz A; Henes FO; Rybczynski M; von Kodolitsch Y; Bley TA; Adam G; Bannas P
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2017 Oct; 19(1):82. PubMed ID: 29084542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Supra-aortic low-dose contrast-enhanced time-resolved magnetic resonance (MR) angiography at 3 T: comparison with time-of-flight MR angiography and high-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
    Lee YJ; Kim BS; Koo JS; Kim BY; Jang J; Choi HS; Jung SL; Ahn KJ
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Jun; 56(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 24951617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intraindividual assessment of the thoracic aorta using contrast and non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
    von Tengg-Kobligk H; Ley-Zaporozhan J; Henninger V; Grünberg KM; Giesel FL; Böckler D; Krummenauer F; Kauczor HU; Ley S
    Rofo; 2009 Mar; 181(3):230-6. PubMed ID: 19229788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of aortoiliac aneurysm before endovascular repair: comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography with multidetector row computed tomographic angiography with an automated analysis software tool.
    Lutz AM; Willmann JK; Pfammatter T; Lachat M; Wildermuth S; Marincek B; Weishaupt D
    J Vasc Surg; 2003 Mar; 37(3):619-27. PubMed ID: 12618702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Highly accelerated single breath-hold noncontrast thoracic MRA: evaluation in a clinical population.
    Lim RP; Winchester PA; Bruno MT; Xu J; Storey P; McGorty K; Sodickson DK; Srichai MB
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Mar; 48(3):145-51. PubMed ID: 23249647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative assessment of ascending aortic aneurysms in Marfan patients using ECG-gated computerized tomographic angiography versus trans-thoracic echocardiography.
    Amsallem M; Ou P; Milleron O; Henry-Feugeas MC; Detaint D; Arnoult F; Vahanian A; Jondeau G
    Int J Cardiol; 2015 Apr; 184():22-27. PubMed ID: 25705006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of a novel Compressed SENSE accelerated 3D modified relaxation-enhanced angiography without contrast and triggering with CE-MRA in imaging of the thoracic aorta.
    Pennig L; Wagner A; Weiss K; Lennartz S; Huntgeburth M; Hickethier T; Maintz D; Naehle CP; Bunck AC; Doerner J
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2021 Jan; 37(1):315-329. PubMed ID: 32852711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Non-enhanced MR angiography of renal arteries: comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
    Angeretti MG; Lumia D; Canì A; Barresi M; Nocchi Cardim L; Piacentino F; Maresca AM; Novario R; Genovese EA; Fugazzola C
    Acta Radiol; 2013 Sep; 54(7):749-56. PubMed ID: 23550187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 3 T contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for evaluation of the intracranial arteries: comparison with time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography and multislice computed tomography angiography.
    Villablanca JP; Nael K; Habibi R; Nael A; Laub G; Finn JP
    Invest Radiol; 2006 Nov; 41(11):799-805. PubMed ID: 17035870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Magnetic resonance imaging of the main pulmonary artery: reliable assessment of dimensions in Marfan patients on a simple axial spin echo image.
    Nollen GJ; van Schijndel KE; Timmermans J; Groenink M; Barentsz JO; van der Wall EE; Stoker J; Mulder BJ
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2003 Apr; 19(2):141-7; discussion 149-50. PubMed ID: 12749395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gated thoracic magnetic resonance angiography at 3T: noncontrast versus blood pool contrast.
    Zhu C; Haraldsson H; Kallianos K; Ge L; Tseng E; Henry T; Saloner D; Hope MD
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Mar; 34(3):475-483. PubMed ID: 28905233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.