171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22240883)
1. In vitro interaction of chronic wound bacteria in biofilms.
Malic S; Hill KE; Playle R; Thomas DW; Williams DW
J Wound Care; 2011 Dec; 20(12):569-70, 572, 574-7. PubMed ID: 22240883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative analysis of the cellular inflammatory response against biofilm bacteria in chronic wounds.
Fazli M; Bjarnsholt T; Kirketerp-Møller K; Jørgensen A; Andersen CB; Givskov M; Tolker-Nielsen T
Wound Repair Regen; 2011; 19(3):387-91. PubMed ID: 21518086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biofilm-forming capacity of Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from ocular infections.
Hou W; Sun X; Wang Z; Zhang Y
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Aug; 53(9):5624-31. PubMed ID: 22736609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative comparison and analysis of species-specific wound biofilm virulence using an in vivo, rabbit-ear model.
Seth AK; Geringer MR; Galiano RD; Leung KP; Mustoe TA; Hong SJ
J Am Coll Surg; 2012 Sep; 215(3):388-99. PubMed ID: 22704819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection and identification of specific bacteria in wound biofilms using peptide nucleic acid fluorescent in situ hybridization (PNA FISH).
Malic S; Hill KE; Hayes A; Percival SL; Thomas DW; Williams DW
Microbiology (Reading); 2009 Aug; 155(Pt 8):2603-2611. PubMed ID: 19477903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro multispecies Lubbock chronic wound biofilm model.
Sun Y; Dowd SE; Smith E; Rhoads DD; Wolcott RD
Wound Repair Regen; 2008; 16(6):805-13. PubMed ID: 19128252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Why chronic wounds will not heal: a novel hypothesis.
Bjarnsholt T; Kirketerp-Møller K; Jensen PØ; Madsen KG; Phipps R; Krogfelt K; Høiby N; Givskov M
Wound Repair Regen; 2008; 16(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 18211573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pattern differentiation in co-culture biofilms formed by Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Yang L; Liu Y; Markussen T; Høiby N; Tolker-Nielsen T; Molin S
FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol; 2011 Aug; 62(3):339-47. PubMed ID: 21595754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Metabolic modeling of a chronic wound biofilm consortium predicts spatial partitioning of bacterial species.
Phalak P; Chen J; Carlson RP; Henson MA
BMC Syst Biol; 2016 Sep; 10(1):90. PubMed ID: 27604263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Maggot excretions/secretions are differentially effective against biofilms of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
van der Plas MJ; Jukema GN; Wai SW; Dogterom-Ballering HC; Lagendijk EL; van Gulpen C; van Dissel JT; Bloemberg GV; Nibbering PH
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2008 Jan; 61(1):117-22. PubMed ID: 17965032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Disruption of Biofilms and Neutralization of Bacteria Using Hypochlorous Acid Solution: An In Vivo and In Vitro Evaluation.
Day A; Alkhalil A; Carney BC; Hoffman HN; Moffatt LT; Shupp JW
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2017 Dec; 30(12):543-551. PubMed ID: 29140837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of tissue-engineered skin to study in vitro biofilm development.
Charles CA; Ricotti CA; Davis SC; Mertz PM; Kirsner RS
Dermatol Surg; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1334-41. PubMed ID: 19496791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of biofilm treatments on the multi-species Lubbock chronic wound biofilm model.
Dowd SE; Sun Y; Smith E; Kennedy JP; Jones CE; Wolcott R
J Wound Care; 2009 Dec; 18(12):508, 510-12. PubMed ID: 20081576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laser irradiation effect on Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms isolated from venous leg ulcer.
Baffoni M; Bessa LJ; Grande R; Di Giulio M; Mongelli M; Ciarelli A; Cellini L
Int Wound J; 2012 Oct; 9(5):517-24. PubMed ID: 22182280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A review of the scientific evidence for biofilms in wounds.
Percival SL; Hill KE; Williams DW; Hooper SJ; Thomas DW; Costerton JW
Wound Repair Regen; 2012; 20(5):647-57. PubMed ID: 22985037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bacteria, biofilm and honey: a study of the effects of honey on 'planktonic' and biofilm-embedded chronic wound bacteria.
Merckoll P; Jonassen TØ; Vad ME; Jeansson SL; Melby KK
Scand J Infect Dis; 2009; 41(5):341-7. PubMed ID: 19308800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. DNase1L2 suppresses biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus.
Eckhart L; Fischer H; Barken KB; Tolker-Nielsen T; Tschachler E
Br J Dermatol; 2007 Jun; 156(6):1342-5. PubMed ID: 17459041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [CHARACTERISTIC FEATURES OF PRESSURE ULCER INFECTION].
Kučišec-Tepeš N
Acta Med Croatica; 2016; 70 Suppl 1():45-51. PubMed ID: 29087671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Anti-candidal activity of clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains and in vitro inhibition of Candida biofilm formation].
Keçeli Özcan S; Dündar D; Sönmez Tamer G
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2012 Jan; 46(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 22399170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Survey of bacterial diversity in chronic wounds using pyrosequencing, DGGE, and full ribosome shotgun sequencing.
Dowd SE; Sun Y; Secor PR; Rhoads DD; Wolcott BM; James GA; Wolcott RD
BMC Microbiol; 2008 Mar; 8():43. PubMed ID: 18325110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
