These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22240930)

  • 1. Clinimetrics of tristimulus colourimeters in scar assessment: a review of evidence.
    Jones HG
    J Wound Care; 2012 Jan; 21(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 22240930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Scarbase Duo(®): Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability and validity of a compact dual scar assessment tool.
    Fell M; Meirte J; Anthonissen M; Maertens K; Pleat J; Moortgat P
    Burns; 2016 Mar; 42(2):336-44. PubMed ID: 26774602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Colour evaluation in scars: tristimulus colorimeter, narrow-band simple reflectance meter or subjective evaluation?
    Draaijers LJ; Tempelman FR; Botman YA; Kreis RW; Middelkoop E; van Zuijlen PP
    Burns; 2004 Mar; 30(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 15019115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Direct comparison of reproducibility and reliability in quantitative assessments of burn scar properties.
    Baumann ME; DeBruler DM; Blackstone BN; Coffey RA; Boyce ST; Supp DM; Bailey JK; Powell HM
    Burns; 2021 Mar; 47(2):466-478. PubMed ID: 32839037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The challenge of objective scar colour assessment in a clinical setting: using digital photography.
    Anderson JC; Hallam MJ; Nduka C; Osorio D
    J Wound Care; 2015 Aug; 24(8):379-87. PubMed ID: 26562381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measurement of vascularity in the scar: A systematic review.
    Deng H; Li-Tsang CWP
    Burns; 2019 Sep; 45(6):1253-1265. PubMed ID: 30545695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How to assess postsurgical scars: a review of outcome measures.
    Vercelli S; Ferriero G; Sartorio F; Stissi V; Franchignoni F
    Disabil Rehabil; 2009; 31(25):2055-63. PubMed ID: 19888834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Scar assessment scales: a dermatologic overview.
    Idriss N; Maibach HI
    Skin Res Technol; 2009 Feb; 15(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 19152571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison between laser-doppler imaging and colorimetry in the assessment of scarring: "a pilot study".
    Peeters W; Anthonissen M; Deliaert A; Van der Hulst R; Van den Kerckhove E
    Skin Res Technol; 2012 May; 18(2):188-91. PubMed ID: 22092605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability of tristimulus colourimetry in the assessment of cutaneous bruise colour.
    Scafide KN; Sheridan DJ; Taylor LA; Hayat MJ
    Injury; 2016 Jun; 47(6):1258-63. PubMed ID: 26997134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A practical and objective approach to scar colour assessment.
    Hallam MJ; McNaught K; Thomas AN; Nduka C
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Oct; 66(10):e271-6. PubMed ID: 23880014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating skin colour diversity in the validation of scar assessment tools.
    Garg SP; Williams T; Taritsa IC; Wan R; Goel C; Harris R; Huffman K; Galiano RD
    Wound Repair Regen; 2023; 31(6):731-737. PubMed ID: 37768279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital imaging analysis of scar aesthetics.
    Valente JH; Jay GD; Schmidt ST; Oh AK; Reinert SE; Zabbo CP
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2012 Mar; 25(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 22343599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A critical analysis of measurements used to assess and manage scars.
    Roques C; Teot L
    Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2007 Dec; 6(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 18048870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Current scales for assessing human scarring: a review.
    Durani P; McGrouther DA; Ferguson MW
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2009 Jun; 62(6):713-20. PubMed ID: 19303834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment methods for the evaluation of vitiligo.
    Alghamdi KM; Kumar A; Taïeb A; Ezzedine K
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2012 Dec; 26(12):1463-71. PubMed ID: 22416879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Changes in subjective vs objective burn scar assessment over time: does the patient agree with what we think?
    Martin D; Umraw N; Gomez M; Cartotto R
    J Burn Care Rehabil; 2003; 24(4):239-44; discussion 238. PubMed ID: 14501421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A prospective randomized evaluation of scar assessment measures.
    Brandt MG; Moore CC; Micomonaco D; Fung K; Franklin JH; Yoo J; Doyle PC
    Laryngoscope; 2009 May; 119(5):841-5. PubMed ID: 19266588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Linear scar reduction using silicone gel sheets in individuals with normal healing.
    Maher SF; Dorko L; Saliga S
    J Wound Care; 2012 Dec; 21(12):602, 604-6, 608-9. PubMed ID: 23299270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cosmetic outcomes of various skin closure methods following cesarean delivery: a randomized trial.
    Cromi A; Ghezzi F; Gottardi A; Cherubino M; Uccella S; Valdatta L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jul; 203(1):36.e1-8. PubMed ID: 20417924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.