These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
426 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22241313)
1. [Clinical evaluation of lingual fixed retainer combined with Hawley retainer and vacuum-formed retainer]. Xu XC; Li RM; Tang GH Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2011 Dec; 20(6):623-6. PubMed ID: 22241313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Can vacuum-formed retainers maintain arch dimensions and alignment compared to Hawley and fixed bonded retainers after treatment with fixed appliances? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hussain U; Kunwar SS; Khan UW; Alnazeh AA; Kamran MA; Alam S; Aziz A; Zaheen M; Pandis N; Campobasso A Eur J Orthod; 2024 Oct; 46(5):. PubMed ID: 39177154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effectiveness of bonded and vacuum-formed retainers: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. O'Rourke N; Albeedh H; Sharma P; Johal A Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Sep; 150(3):406-15. PubMed ID: 27585768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effectiveness of Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers: a single-center randomized controlled trial. Rowland H; Hichens L; Williams A; Hills D; Killingback N; Ewings P; Clark S; Ireland AJ; Sandy JR Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Dec; 132(6):730-7. PubMed ID: 18068589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative evaluation of salivary microbial levels and periodontal status of patients wearing fixed and removable orthodontic retainers. Eroglu AK; Baka ZM; Arslan U Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Aug; 156(2):186-192. PubMed ID: 31375228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vacuum-formed retainer versus bonded retainer for dental stabilization in the mandible-a randomized controlled trial. Part I: retentive capacity 6 and 18 months after orthodontic treatment. Krämer A; Sjöström M; Hallman M; Feldmann I Eur J Orthod; 2020 Nov; 42(5):551-558. PubMed ID: 31665279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The retention characteristics of Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers with different retention protocols. Ramazanzadeh B; Ahrari F; Hosseini ZS J Clin Exp Dent; 2018 Mar; 10(3):e224-e231. PubMed ID: 29721222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative evaluation of salivary bisphenol A levels in patients wearing vacuum-formed and Hawley retainers: An in-vivo study. Raghavan AS; Pottipalli Sathyanarayana H; Kailasam V; Padmanabhan S Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Mar; 151(3):471-476. PubMed ID: 28257731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. "Comparing the effectiveness, acceptability and oral hygiene status between vacuum formed retainer and Begg's retainer": a pilot study. Patnaik P; Nanda SB; Mishra S BMC Oral Health; 2023 May; 23(1):266. PubMed ID: 37161557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Stability of the Results of Orthodontic Treatment and Gingival Health between Hawley and Vacuum-formed Retainers. Moslemzadeh SH; Sohrabi A; Rafighi A; Farshidnia S J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Apr; 19(4):443-449. PubMed ID: 29728551 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Objective evaluation of compliance after orthodontic treatment using Hawley or vacuum-formed retainers: A 2-center randomized controlled trial over a 3-month period. Vagdouti G; Karvouni E; Bitsanis E; Koletsi D Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Dec; 156(6):717-726.e2. PubMed ID: 31784005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Which orthodontic retention protocol should I implement? A critical assessment of a randomised controlled trial. Steegmans PAJ; Cavagnetto D; Reynders RAM Evid Based Dent; 2022 Dec; 23(4):162-165. PubMed ID: 36526846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Factors affecting stability after fixed orthodontic treatment]. Ren SS; Dai X; Ying M; Wang WX; Chang J; Hou ZM Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Sep; 53(9):599-603. PubMed ID: 30196619 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Survival analysis of orthodontic retainers. Jin C; Bennani F; Gray A; Farella M; Mei L Eur J Orthod; 2018 Sep; 40(5):531-536. PubMed ID: 29370399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bonded versus vacuum-formed retainers: a randomized controlled trial. Part 1: stability, retainer survival, and patient satisfaction outcomes after 12 months. Forde K; Storey M; Littlewood SJ; Scott P; Luther F; Kang J Eur J Orthod; 2018 Jul; 40(4):387-398. PubMed ID: 29059289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bonded versus vacuum-formed retainers: a randomized controlled trial. Part 2: periodontal health outcomes after 12 months. Storey M; Forde K; Littlewood SJ; Scott P; Luther F; Kang J Eur J Orthod; 2018 Jul; 40(4):399-408. PubMed ID: 29059293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Post-treatment stability after 5 years of retention with vacuum-formed and bonded retainers-a randomized controlled trial. Krämer A; Sjöström M; Apelthun C; Hallman M; Feldmann I Eur J Orthod; 2023 Feb; 45(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 35968668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Acceptability comparison between Hawley retainers and vacuum-formed retainers in orthodontic adult patients: a single-centre, randomized controlled trial. Saleh M; Hajeer MY; Muessig D Eur J Orthod; 2017 Aug; 39(4):453-461. PubMed ID: 28430890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Effects of Hawley retainer and vacuum-formed retainer on articulation of Chinese speech of adult orthodontic patients: a randomized controlled trial]. Jia W; Lun Y; Junyu C; Zhiqiang C; Tong W Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Aug; 34(4):381-386. PubMed ID: 28317356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A retrospective randomized double-blind comparison study of the effectiveness of Hawley vs vacuum-formed retainers. Barlin S; Smith R; Reed R; Sandy J; Ireland AJ Angle Orthod; 2011 May; 81(3):404-9. PubMed ID: 21261482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]