93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22241616)
21. Field nonuniformity correction for quantitative analysis of digitized mammograms.
Pawluczyk O; Yaffe MJ
Med Phys; 2001 Apr; 28(4):438-44. PubMed ID: 11339739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Technical challenges in generalizing calibration techniques for breast density measurements.
Fowler EEE; Smallwood AM; Khan NZ; Kilpatrick K; Sellers TA; Heine J
Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):679-688. PubMed ID: 30525207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Quantification and normalization of x-ray mammograms.
Tromans CE; Cocker MR; Brady SM
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Oct; 57(20):6519-40. PubMed ID: 23010610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Volumetric breast density assessment: reproducibility in serial examinations and comparison with visual assessment.
Singh JM; Fallenberg EM; Diekmann F; Renz DM; Witlandt R; Bick U; Engelken F
Rofo; 2013 Sep; 185(9):844-8. PubMed ID: 23888472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Breast image analysis for risk assessment, detection, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer.
Giger ML; Karssemeijer N; Schnabel JA
Annu Rev Biomed Eng; 2013; 15():327-57. PubMed ID: 23683087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effective radiation attenuation calibration for breast density: compression thickness influences and correction.
Heine JJ; Cao K; Thomas JA
Biomed Eng Online; 2010 Nov; 9():73. PubMed ID: 21080916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. MRT letter: Quantum noise removal and classification of breast mammogram images.
Naseem MT; Sulong GB; Jaffar MA
Microsc Res Tech; 2012 Dec; 75(12):1609-12. PubMed ID: 23034955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Quantitative assessment of percent breast density: analog versus digital acquisition.
Harvey JA
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2004 Dec; 3(6):611-6. PubMed ID: 15560719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Breast tissue segmentation from x-ray radiographs.
Chen C; Nielsen M; Karssemeijer N; Brandt SS
Phys Med Biol; 2014 May; 59(10):2445-56. PubMed ID: 24778348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Validation of a method for measuring the volumetric breast density from digital mammograms.
Alonzo-Proulx O; Packard N; Boone JM; Al-Mayah A; Brock KK; Shen SZ; Yaffe MJ
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jun; 55(11):3027-44. PubMed ID: 20463377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Optimization of volumetric breast density estimation in digital mammograms.
Holland K; Gubern-Mérida A; Mann RM; Karssemeijer N
Phys Med Biol; 2017 May; 62(9):3779-3797. PubMed ID: 28230532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Mammogram enhancement using alpha weighted quadratic filter.
Zhou Y; Panetta K; Agaian S
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():3681-4. PubMed ID: 19965002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Technical Note: Validation of two methods to determine contact area between breast and compression paddle in mammography.
Branderhorst W; de Groot JE; van Lier MGJTB; Highnam RP; den Heeten GJ; Grimbergen CA
Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):4040-4044. PubMed ID: 28569996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Development of a quantitative method for analysis of breast density based on three-dimensional breast MRI.
Nie K; Chen JH; Chan S; Chau MK; Yu HJ; Bahri S; Tseng T; Nalcioglu O; Su MY
Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5253-62. PubMed ID: 19175084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Analysis of structural similarity in mammograms for detection of bilateral asymmetry.
Casti P; Mencattini A; Salmeri M; Rangayyan RM
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2015 Feb; 34(2):662-71. PubMed ID: 25361502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A digital equalisation technique improving visualisation of dense mammary gland and breast periphery in mammography.
Stefanoyiannis AP; Costaridou L; Skiadopoulos S; Panayiotakis G
Eur J Radiol; 2003 Feb; 45(2):139-49. PubMed ID: 12536094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Segmentation of the fibro-glandular disc in mammograms using Gaussian mixture modelling.
Ferrari RJ; Rangayyan RM; Borges RA; Frère AF
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2004 May; 42(3):378-87. PubMed ID: 15191084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Entropy based unsupervised Feature Selection in digital mammogram image using rough set theory.
Velayutham C; Thangavel K
Int J Comput Biol Drug Des; 2012; 5(1):16-34. PubMed ID: 22436296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Diagnosis of breast cancer in light microscopic and mammographic images textures using relative entropy via kernel estimation.
Korkmaz SA; Korkmaz MF; Poyraz M
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2016 Apr; 54(4):561-73. PubMed ID: 26345243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Fast, robust, and accurate determination of transmission electron microscopy contrast transfer function.
Sorzano CO; Jonic S; Núñez-Ramírez R; Boisset N; Carazo JM
J Struct Biol; 2007 Nov; 160(2):249-62. PubMed ID: 17911028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
