These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22243211)

  • 21. Small-scale modelling of the physiochemical impacts of CO2 leaked from sub-seabed reservoirs or pipelines within the North Sea and surrounding waters.
    Dewar M; Wei W; McNeil D; Chen B
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2013 Aug; 73(2):504-15. PubMed ID: 23628549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Potential impacts of leakage from deep CO2 geosequestration on overlying freshwater aquifers.
    Little MG; Jackson RB
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Dec; 44(23):9225-32. PubMed ID: 20977267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Future carbon balance of China's forests under climate change and increasing CO2.
    Ju WM; Chen JM; Harvey D; Wang S
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Nov; 85(3):538-62. PubMed ID: 17187919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mineral sequestration of CO(2) by aqueous carbonation of coal combustion fly-ash.
    Montes-Hernandez G; Pérez-López R; Renard F; Nieto JM; Charlet L
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Jan; 161(2-3):1347-54. PubMed ID: 18539389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Application of amine-tethered solid sorbents for direct CO2 capture from the ambient air.
    Choi S; Drese JH; Eisenberger PM; Jones CW
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Mar; 45(6):2420-7. PubMed ID: 21323309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Practical modeling approaches for geological storage of carbon dioxide.
    Celia MA; Nordbotten JM
    Ground Water; 2009; 47(5):627-38. PubMed ID: 19563425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Potential restrictions for CO2 sequestration sites due to shale and tight gas production.
    Elliot TR; Celia MA
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Apr; 46(7):4223-7. PubMed ID: 22352312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Water use at pulverized coal power plants with postcombustion carbon capture and storage.
    Zhai H; Rubin ES; Versteeg PL
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Mar; 45(6):2479-85. PubMed ID: 21329343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. CCS activities being performed by the U.S. DOE.
    Dressel B; Deel D; Rodosta T; Plasynski S; Litynski J; Myer L
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2011 Feb; 8(2):300-20. PubMed ID: 21556188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Options for near-term phaseout of CO(2) emissions from coal use in the United States.
    Kharecha PA; Kutscher CF; Hansen JE; Mazria E
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Jun; 44(11):4050-62. PubMed ID: 20429611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The atmospheric signature of carbon capture and storage.
    Keeling RF; Manning AC; Dubey MK
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2011 May; 369(1943):2113-32. PubMed ID: 21502179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Simultaneous measurement of ventilation using tracer gas techniques and VOC concentrations in homes, garages and vehicles.
    Batterman S; Jia C; Hatzivasilis G; Godwin C
    J Environ Monit; 2006 Feb; 8(2):249-56. PubMed ID: 16470256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Anthropogenic chemical carbon cycle for a sustainable future.
    Olah GA; Prakash GK; Goeppert A
    J Am Chem Soc; 2011 Aug; 133(33):12881-98. PubMed ID: 21612273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An integrated assessment model of carbon sequestration benefits: a case study of Liping county, China.
    Caldwell IM; Maclaren VW; Chen JM; Ju WM; Zhou S; Yin Y; Boland A
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Nov; 85(3):757-73. PubMed ID: 17178433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Policy-Driven Potential for Deploying Carbon Capture and Sequestration in a Fossil-Rich Power Sector.
    Dindi A; Coddington K; Garofalo JF; Wu W; Zhai H
    Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Jul; 56(14):9872-9881. PubMed ID: 35785993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Deciding between carbon trading and carbon capture and sequestration: an optimisation-based case study for methanol synthesis from syngas.
    Üçtuğ FG; Ağralı S; Arıkan Y; Avcıoğlu E
    J Environ Manage; 2014 Jan; 132():1-8. PubMed ID: 24246850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Room-temperature ionic liquids and composite materials: platform technologies for CO(2) capture.
    Bara JE; Camper DE; Gin DL; Noble RD
    Acc Chem Res; 2010 Jan; 43(1):152-9. PubMed ID: 19795831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of well spacing on geological storage site distribution costs and surface footprint.
    Eccles J; Pratson LF; Chandel MK
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Apr; 46(8):4649-56. PubMed ID: 22433004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Environmental bonds and the challenge of long-term carbon sequestration.
    Gerard D; Wilson EJ
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Feb; 90(2):1097-105. PubMed ID: 18619728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The hydrogen issue.
    Armaroli N; Balzani V
    ChemSusChem; 2011 Jan; 4(1):21-36. PubMed ID: 21226208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.