These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2224424)

  • 21. Performance of chronotypes on memory tests during the morning and the evening shifts.
    Hidalgo MP; Zanette CB; Pedrotti M; Souza CM; Nunes PV; Chaves ML
    Psychol Rep; 2004 Aug; 95(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 15460360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. List composition and the word-frequency effect for recognition memory.
    Malmberg KJ; Murnane K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jul; 28(4):616-30. PubMed ID: 12109757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Associative recognition: a case of recall-to-reject processing.
    Rotello CM; Heit E
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Sep; 28(6):907-22. PubMed ID: 11105517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. TACHISTOSCOPIC RECOGNITION THRESHOLDS, PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING, AND FREE RECALL AS A FUNCTION OF ABSTRACTNESS-CONCRETENESS AND WORD FREQUENCY.
    WINNICK WA; KRESSEL K
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 Aug; 70():163-8. PubMed ID: 14341747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A bias interpretation of facilitation in perceptual identification.
    Ratcliff R; McKoon G; Verwoerd M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 May; 15(3):378-87. PubMed ID: 2524543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Generation enhances semantic processing? The role of distinctiveness in the generation effect.
    Kinoshita S
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Sep; 17(5):563-71. PubMed ID: 2796741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Recency effects in direct and indirect memory tasks.
    McKenzie WA; Humphreys MS
    Mem Cognit; 1991 Jul; 19(4):321-31. PubMed ID: 1895942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Component-levels theory of the effects of spacing of repetitions on recall and recognition.
    Glenberg AM
    Mem Cognit; 1979 Mar; 7(2):95-112. PubMed ID: 459836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Glucose, relational memory, and the hippocampus.
    Stollery B; Christian L
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2015 Jun; 232(12):2113-25. PubMed ID: 25527036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. EFFECTS OF TWO-WORD STIMULI ON RECALL AND LEARNING IN A PAIRED-ASSOCIATE TASK.
    MUSGRAVE BS; COHEN JC
    J Exp Psychol; 1964 Aug; 68():161-6. PubMed ID: 14194403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Recognition failure and the composite memory trace in CHARM.
    Metcalfe J
    Psychol Rev; 1991 Oct; 98(4):529-53. PubMed ID: 1961772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Implicit memory, explicit memory and the picture bizarreness effect.
    Nicolas S; Marchal A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1998 Jun; 99(1):43-58. PubMed ID: 9664838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Age differences in predictions and performance on a cued recall task.
    Shaw RJ; Craik FI
    Psychol Aging; 1989 Jun; 4(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 2789740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The role of age of acquisition in memory: effects on judgements of learning and recall.
    Illman NA; Morrison CM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Sep; 64(9):1665-71. PubMed ID: 21838653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Forgetting curves in long-term memory: evidence for a multistage model of retention.
    Fioravanti M; Di Cesare F
    Brain Cogn; 1992 Mar; 18(2):116-24. PubMed ID: 1575971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The role of attention in automatization: does attention operate at encoding, or retrieval, or both?
    Boronat CB; Logan GD
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Jan; 25(1):36-46. PubMed ID: 9046868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Working-memory capacity as long-term memory activation: an individual-differences approach.
    Cantor J; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1993 Sep; 19(5):1101-14. PubMed ID: 8409850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Forgetting and the mirror effect in recognition memory: concentering of underlying distributions.
    Glanzer M; Adams JK; Iverson G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1991 Jan; 17(1):81-93. PubMed ID: 1826733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Process demands of rejection mechanisms of recognition memory.
    Odegard TN; Koen JD; Gama JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1296-304. PubMed ID: 18763906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Adding new word associations to semantic memory: evidence for two interactive learning components.
    Schrijnemakers JM; Raaijmakers JG
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1997 Jun; 96(1-2):103-32. PubMed ID: 9210853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.