These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2224425)

  • 1. The influence of permeability of group boundaries and stability of group status on strategies of individual mobility and social change.
    Ellemers N; van Knippenberg A; Wilke H
    Br J Soc Psychol; 1990 Sep; 29 ( Pt 3)():233-46. PubMed ID: 2224425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Permeability of Group Boundaries: Development of the Concept and a Scale.
    Armenta BM; Stroebe K; Scheibe S; Van Yperen NW; Stegeman A; Postmes T
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2017 Mar; 43(3):418-433. PubMed ID: 28903696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Individuality and social influence in groups: inductive and deductive routes to group identity.
    Postmes T; Spears R; Lee AT; Novak RJ
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2005 Nov; 89(5):747-63. PubMed ID: 16351366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Status differences and in-group bias: a meta-analytic examination of the effects of status stability, status legitimacy, and group permeability.
    Bettencourt BA; Dorr N; Charlton K; Hume DL
    Psychol Bull; 2001 Jul; 127(4):520-42. PubMed ID: 11439710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Explaining the link between objective and perceived differences in groups: The role of the belonging and distinctiveness motives.
    Ormiston ME
    J Appl Psychol; 2016 Feb; 101(2):222-36. PubMed ID: 26302051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Individual versus collective responses to membership in a low-status group: the effects of stability and individual ability.
    Boen F; Vanbeselaere N
    J Soc Psychol; 2001 Dec; 141(6):765-83. PubMed ID: 11827224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is Martin Luther King or Malcolm X the more acceptable face of protest? High-status groups' reactions to low-status groups' collective action.
    Teixeira CP; Spears R; Yzerbyt VY
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2020 May; 118(5):919-944. PubMed ID: 31169387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Commonality and the complexity of "we": social attitudes and social change.
    Dovidio JF; Gaertner SL; Saguy T
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2009 Feb; 13(1):3-20. PubMed ID: 19144903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Knowing your place: self-perceptions of status in face-to-face groups.
    Anderson C; Srivastava S; Beer JS; Spataro SE; Chatman JA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Dec; 91(6):1094-110. PubMed ID: 17144767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The language of change? Characterizations of in-group social position, threat, and the deployment of distinctive group attributes.
    Livingstone AG; Spears R; Manstead AS
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2009 Jun; 48(Pt 2):295-311. PubMed ID: 18652735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Upward and downward comparison in the intermediate-status group: the role of social stratification stability.
    Caricati L
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2012 Jun; 51(2):374-84. PubMed ID: 21883302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Striving for success in outgroup settings: effects of contextually emphasizing ingroup dimensions on stigmatized group members' social identity and performance styles.
    Derks B; van Laar C; Ellemers N
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 May; 32(5):576-88. PubMed ID: 16702152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Respect the technique: Status-based respect increases minority group social cohesion with majority groups, while also increasing minority collective action tendencies.
    Glasford DE; Johnston B
    J Soc Psychol; 2018; 158(2):201-214. PubMed ID: 28481712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diversity in in-group bias: structural factors, situational features, and social functions.
    Scheepers D; Spears R; Doosje B; Manstead AS
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Jun; 90(6):944-60. PubMed ID: 16784344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intergroup alliance orientation among intermediate-status group members: The role of stability of social stratification.
    Caricati L; Moscato G; Bonetti C
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235931. PubMed ID: 32706771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intergroup biases of the intermediate-status group: the effect of stability and instability of social stratification.
    Caricati L; Monacelli N
    J Soc Psychol; 2012; 152(6):713-26. PubMed ID: 23057191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. When I equals we: exploring the relation between social and personal identity of extreme right-wing political party members.
    Baray G; Postmes T; Jetten J
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2009 Dec; 48(Pt 4):625-47. PubMed ID: 19232156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Big fish in small ponds: a social hierarchy analysis of intergroup bias.
    Seta JJ; Seta CE
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1996 Dec; 71(6):1210-21. PubMed ID: 8979387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Social Identification in Sports Teams: The Role of Personal, Social, and Collective Identity Motives.
    Thomas WE; Brown R; Easterbrook MJ; Vignoles VL; Manzi C; D'Angelo C; Holt JJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2017 Apr; 43(4):508-523. PubMed ID: 28903661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The chains on all my people are the chains on me: Restrictions to collective autonomy undermine the personal autonomy and psychological well-being of group members.
    Kachanoff FJ; Taylor DM; Caouette J; Khullar TH; Wohl MJA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 Jan; 116(1):141-165. PubMed ID: 29323507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.