151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22244682)
1. Lymphadenectomy increases the prognostic value of the revised 2009 FIGO staging system for endometrial cancer: a multi-center study.
Kim HS; Kim HY; Park CY; Lee JM; Lee JK; Cho CH; Kim SM; Kim JW
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2012 Mar; 38(3):230-7. PubMed ID: 22244682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Should all endometrioid uterine cancer patients undergo systemic lymphadenectomy?
Wang ZQ; Wang JL; Shen DH; Li XP; Wei LH
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2013 Apr; 39(4):344-9. PubMed ID: 23333067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in stage IIIC endometrial cancer: A single-institute study.
Kikuchi A; Yanase T; Sasagawa M; Honma S
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 May; 37(4):510-513. PubMed ID: 28421906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Survival impact based on the thoroughness of pelvic lymphadenectomy in intermediate- or high-risk groups of endometrioid-type endometrial cancer: A multi-center retrospective cohort analysis.
Kim TH; Kim HS; Kim TJ; Chang SJ; Kim DY; Ryu SY; Kim BG; Kim YT; Bae DS; Ryu HS; Nam JH
Gynecol Oncol; 2016 Jun; 141(3):440-446. PubMed ID: 27020700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The prognostic value of the presence of pelvic and/or para-aortic lymph node metastases in cervical cancer patients; the influence of the new FIGO classification (stage IIIC).
van Kol KGG; Ebisch RMF; van der Aa M; Wenzel HB; Piek JMJ; Bekkers RLM
Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Apr; 171():9-14. PubMed ID: 36804623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The prognostic significance of aortic lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer: Potential implications for selective aortic lymph node assessment.
Cosgrove CM; Cohn DE; Rhoades J; Felix AS
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Jun; 153(3):505-510. PubMed ID: 30935714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of lymphadenectomy in uterine endometrioid carcinoma.
Huang CY; Ho CM; Chen YL; You SL; Chen CA; Cheng WF
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2013 Apr; 39(4):350-7. PubMed ID: 23462243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A multicenter analysis of adjuvant therapy after surgery for stage IIIC endometrial adenocarcinoma: A Korean Radiation Oncology Group study (KROG 13-17).
Yoon MS; Park W; Huh SJ; Kim HJ; Kim YS; Kim YB; Kim JY; Lee JH; Kim HJ; Cha J; Kim JH; Kim J; Yoon WS; Choi JH; Chun M; Choi Y; Chang SK; Lee KK; Kim M
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Sep; 138(3):519-25. PubMed ID: 26115977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Endometrial carcinoma: clinical characteristic and survival rates by the new compared to the prior FIGO staging systems.
Tangjitgamol S; Srijaipracharoen S; Manusirivithaya S; Khunnarong J; Pataradool K; Thavaramara T
J Med Assoc Thai; 2013 May; 96(5):505-12. PubMed ID: 23745302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnetic resonance imaging-based validation of the 2018 FIGO staging system in patients treated with definitive radiotherapy for locally advanced cervix cancer.
Kim J; Cho Y; Kim N; Chung SY; Kim JW; Lee IJ; Kim YB
Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Mar; 160(3):735-741. PubMed ID: 33358037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of the new FIGO staging system (2009) for vulvar cancer in the Chinese population.
Li J; Cai Y; Ke G; Xiang L; Wang L; Yang W; Wu X; Yang H
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 May; 137(2):274-9. PubMed ID: 25759305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Magnetic resonance staging accuracy for endometrial carcinoma based on different FIGO staging systems].
Zhang YL; Ding GJ; Shi L; Chen YQ
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 May; 93(19):1486-9. PubMed ID: 24029574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is the revised 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer more prognostic than the 2009 FIGO staging system for women previously staged as IB disease?
Ayhan A; Aslan K; Bulut AN; Akilli H; Öz M; Haberal A; Meydanli MM
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Sep; 240():209-214. PubMed ID: 31325847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prognostic Performance of the 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Cervical Cancer Staging Guidelines.
Wright JD; Matsuo K; Huang Y; Tergas AI; Hou JY; Khoury-Collado F; St Clair CM; Ananth CV; Neugut AI; Hershman DL
Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jul; 134(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 31188324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. FIGO staging of endometrial cancer: 2023.
Berek JS; Matias-Guiu X; Creutzberg C; Fotopoulou C; Gaffney D; Kehoe S; Lindemann K; Mutch D; Concin N;
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2023 Aug; 162(2):383-394. PubMed ID: 37337978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Survival outcomes of 2018 FIGO stage IIIC versus stages IIIA and IIIB in cervical cancer: A systematic review with meta-analysis.
Zhang Y; Wang C; Zhao Z; Cheng L; Xu S; Xie P; Xie L; Zhang S
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2024 Jun; 165(3):959-968. PubMed ID: 37950594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Phase III trial to confirm the superiority of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy to pelvic lymphadenectomy alone for endometrial cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study 1412 (SEPAL-P3).
Watari H; Katayama H; Shibata T; Ushijima K; Satoh T; Onda T; Aoki D; Fukuda H; Yaegashi N; Sakuragi N;
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2017 Oct; 47(10):986-990. PubMed ID: 28981739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does para-aortic lymphadenectomy improve survival in pathologically diagnosed early-stage grade 3 endometrioid and non-endometrioid endometrial cancers? A retrospective cohort study in Korea and Taiwan.
Lai YL; Chang CS; Chang K; Kim HS; Chen J; Cheng WF; Chen YL; Lee YY
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Oct; 167(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 35995599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pattern of care in operable endometrial cancer treated at a rural-based tertiary care cancer center.
Dessai SB; Adrash D; Geetha M; Arvind S; Bipin J; Nayanar S; Sachin K; Biji MS; Balasubramanian S
Indian J Cancer; 2016; 53(3):416-419. PubMed ID: 28244473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of the 2018 FIGO Staging System for Predicting the Prognosis of Patients With Stage IIIC Cervical Cancer.
Long X; He M; Yang L; Zou D; Wang D; Chen Y; Zhou Q
Clin Med Insights Oncol; 2023; 17():11795549221146652. PubMed ID: 36726607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
