257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22244682)
1. Lymphadenectomy increases the prognostic value of the revised 2009 FIGO staging system for endometrial cancer: a multi-center study.
Kim HS; Kim HY; Park CY; Lee JM; Lee JK; Cho CH; Kim SM; Kim JW
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2012 Mar; 38(3):230-7. PubMed ID: 22244682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. New revised FIGO 2008 staging system for endometrial cancer produces better discrimination in survival compared with the 1988 staging system.
Kato T; Watari H; Endo D; Mitamura T; Odagiri T; Konno Y; Hosaka M; Kobayashi N; Todo Y; Sudo S; Takeda M; Dong P; Kaneuchi M; Kudo M; Sakuragi N
J Surg Oncol; 2012 Dec; 106(8):938-41. PubMed ID: 22740340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lymph-vascular space invasion and number of positive para-aortic node groups predict survival in node-positive patients with endometrial cancer.
Watari H; Todo Y; Takeda M; Ebina Y; Yamamoto R; Sakuragi N
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Mar; 96(3):651-7. PubMed ID: 15721407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does the revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for endometrial cancer lead to increased discrimination in patient outcomes?
Cooke EW; Pappas L; Gaffney DK
Cancer; 2011 Sep; 117(18):4231-7. PubMed ID: 21387282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Significance of prognostic evaluation of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 staging system on stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma].
Wang ZQ; Zhang Y; Wang JL; Shen DH; Mu T; Zhao X; Yao YY; Bai Y; Wei LH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Jan; 47(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 22455691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Revision of FIGO surgical staging in 2009 for endometrial cancer validates to improve risk stratification.
Werner HM; Trovik J; Marcickiewicz J; Tingulstad S; Staff AC; Amant F; Salvesen HB;
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Apr; 125(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 22100838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Impact of 2009 FIGO staging system on the diagnostic value of preoperative MRI staging of endometrial carcinoma].
Yu XD; Ouyang H; Lin M; Zhou CW; Zhang R
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2011 Sep; 33(9):692-6. PubMed ID: 22340052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. FIGO stage IIIC endometrial carcinoma with metastases confined to pelvic lymph nodes: analysis of treatment outcomes, prognostic variables, and failure patterns following adjuvant radiation therapy.
Nelson G; Randall M; Sutton G; Moore D; Hurteau J; Look K
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Nov; 75(2):211-4. PubMed ID: 10525373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pelvic lymph node count is an important prognostic variable for FIGO stage I and II endometrial carcinoma with high-risk histology.
Lutman CV; Havrilesky LJ; Cragun JM; Secord AA; Calingaert B; Berchuck A; Clarke-Pearson DL; Soper JT
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Jul; 102(1):92-7. PubMed ID: 16406063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Para-aortic lymphadenectomy improves survival in patients with intermediate to high-risk endometrial carcinoma.
Chang SJ; Kim WY; Yoon JH; Yoo SC; Chang KH; Ryu HS
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(12):1361-9. PubMed ID: 18951214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Should all endometrioid uterine cancer patients undergo systemic lymphadenectomy?
Wang ZQ; Wang JL; Shen DH; Li XP; Wei LH
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2013 Apr; 39(4):344-9. PubMed ID: 23333067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in stage IIIC endometrial cancer: A single-institute study.
Kikuchi A; Yanase T; Sasagawa M; Honma S
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 May; 37(4):510-513. PubMed ID: 28421906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoscopic surgical staging in cervical cancer--preliminary experience among Chinese.
Chu KK; Chang SD; Chen FP; Soong YK
Gynecol Oncol; 1997 Jan; 64(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 8995546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Para-aortic lymphadenectomy may improve disease-related survival in patients with multipositive pelvic lymph node stage IIIc endometrial cancer.
Fujimoto T; Nanjyo H; Nakamura A; Yokoyama Y; Takano T; Shoji T; Nakahara K; Yamada H; Mizunuma H; Yaegashi N; Sugiyama T; Kurachi H; Sato A; Tanaka T
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Nov; 107(2):253-9. PubMed ID: 17640720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surgical stage, final grade, and survival of women with endometrial carcinoma whose preoperative endometrial biopsy shows well-differentiated tumors.
Eltabbakh GH; Shamonki J; Mount SL
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Nov; 99(2):309-12. PubMed ID: 16005945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Synchronous primary cancers of the endometrium and ovary: review of 43 cases].
Ma SK; Zhang HT; Sun YC; Wu LY
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2008 Sep; 30(9):690-4. PubMed ID: 19173912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prognostic value of pelvic lymphadenectomy in surgical treatment of apparent stage I endometrial cancer.
Ceccaroni M; Savelli L; Bovicelli A; Alboni C; Ceccarini M; Farina A; Bovicelli L
Anticancer Res; 2004; 24(3b):2073-8. PubMed ID: 15274403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Prognosis after complete surgical resection for non-small cell lung cancer based on the staging classification].
Pfannschmidt J; Muley T; Hoffmann H; Bülzebruck H; Dienemann H
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2006 Nov; 131(47):2643-8. PubMed ID: 17109272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A validation study of the new revised FIGO staging system to estimate prognosis for patients with stage IIIC endometrial cancer.
Todo Y; Kato H; Minobe S; Okamoto K; Suzuki Y; Konno Y; Takeda M; Watari H; Kaneuchi M; Sakuragi N
Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Apr; 121(1):126-30. PubMed ID: 21194738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. FIGO stage IIIC endometrial carcinoma: prognostic factors and outcomes.
Hoekstra AV; Kim RJ; Small W; Rademaker AW; Helenowski IB; Singh DK; Schink JC; Lurain JR
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Aug; 114(2):273-8. PubMed ID: 19428094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
