185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22245041)
1. Standardizing pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic entry. Time, volume, or pressure: which is best?
Thomson AJ; Shoukrey MN; Gemmell I; Abbott JA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2012; 19(2):196-200. PubMed ID: 22245041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laparoscopic entry: a review of techniques, technologies, and complications.
Vilos GA; Ternamian A; Dempster J; Laberge PY;
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2007 May; 29(5):433-447. PubMed ID: 17493376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of body habitus and parity on insufflated CO2 volume at various intraabdominal pressures during laparoscopic access in women.
Abu-Rafea B; Vilos GA; Vilos AG; Hollett-Caines J; Al-Omran M
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 16698526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High-pressure laparoscopic entry does not adversely affect cardiopulmonary function in healthy women.
Abu-Rafea B; Vilos GA; Vilos AG; Ahmad R; Hollett-Caines J; Al-Omran M
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(6):475-9. PubMed ID: 16337573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of body habitus and parity on the initial Veres intraperitoneal CO2 insufflation pressure during laparoscopic access in women.
Vilos AG; Vilos GA; Abu-Rafea B; Hollett-Caines J; Al-Omran M
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(2):108-13. PubMed ID: 16527712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Initial laparoscopic access in postmenopausal women: a preliminary prospective study.
Tinelli A; Malvasi A; Guido M; Istre O; Keckstein J; Mettler L
Menopause; 2009; 16(5):966-70. PubMed ID: 19390464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of a method to expel intraperitoneal gas after gynecologic laparoscopy.
Thomson AJ; Abbott JA; Lenart M; Willison F; Vancaillie TG; Bennett MJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 15904615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The pressure profile test is more sensitive and specific than Palmer's test in predicting correct placement of the Veress needle.
Yoong W; Saxena S; Mittal M; Stavroulis A; Ogbodo E; Damodaram M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 Oct; 152(2):210-3. PubMed ID: 20728980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Direct trocar insertion without previous pneumoperitoneum versus insertion after insufflation with Veress needle in laparoscopic gynecological surgery: a prospective cohort study.
Pantoja Garrido M; Frías Sánchez Z; Zapardiel Gutiérrez I; Torrejón R; Jiménez Sánchez C; Polo Velasco A; Márquez Maraver F; Rodríguez Jiménez I; Jiménez Gallardo J; Fernández Alba JJ
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Oct; 39(7):1000-1005. PubMed ID: 31210067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Safe laparoscopic entry guided by Veress needle CO2 insufflation pressure.
Vilos GA; Vilos AG
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 2003 Aug; 10(3):415-20. PubMed ID: 14567827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An evaluation of four tests used to ascertain Veres needle placement at closed laparoscopy.
Teoh B; Sen R; Abbott J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 15904620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pressure-controlled vs volume-controlled ventilation during laparoscopic gynecologic surgery.
Oğurlu M; Küçük M; Bilgin F; Sizlan A; Yanarateş O; Eksert S; Karaşahin E; Coşar A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(3):295-300. PubMed ID: 20303833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoscopic Entry Technique Using a Veress Needle Insertion with and without Concomitant CO
Mikhail E; Tamhane N; Sarkar P; Sappenfield E; Tanner JP; Imudia AN
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(7):1383-1388. PubMed ID: 30802609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Randomized control trial on effectiveness and safety of direct trocar versus Veress needle entry techniques in obese women during diagnostic laparoscopy.
Ikechebelu JI; Eleje GU; Joe-Ikechebelu NN; Okafor CD; Okpala BC; Ugwu EO; Nwachukwu CE; Okoro CC; Okam PC
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Sep; 304(3):815-822. PubMed ID: 33417065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three simple steps during closed laparoscopic entry may minimize major injuries.
Vilos GA; Vilos AG; Abu-Rafea B; Hollett-Caines J; Nikkhah-Abyaneh Z; Edris F
Surg Endosc; 2009 Apr; 23(4):758-64. PubMed ID: 18626703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Initial access for laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. French Society of Endoscopic Gynecology, International Society of Pelvic Surgery and the National College of French Gynecologists-Obstetricians].
Pierre F; Chapron C; Deshayes M; Madelenat P; Magnin G; Querleu D
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2000 Feb; 29(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 10675828
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Risks associated with laparoscopic entry].
Collinet P; Ballester M; Fauconnier A; Deffieux X; Pierre F;
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2010 Dec; 39(8 Suppl 2):S123-35. PubMed ID: 21185465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Carbon dioxide versus room air for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and comparison with standard laparoscopic pneumoperitoneum.
von Delius S; Sager J; Feussner H; Wilhelm D; Thies P; Huber W; Schuster T; Schneider A; Schmid RM; Meining A
Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Jul; 72(1):161-9, 169.e1-2. PubMed ID: 20381043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [ Ambulatory laparoscopic gynecological surgery in Africa: feasibility].
Nzoghe Nguema P; Ogowet Igumu N; Pither S; Ngaka Nsafu D
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2001 Sep; 30(5):462-6. PubMed ID: 11598560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A prospective randomized, controlled study comparing low pressure versus high pressure pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Joshipura VP; Haribhakti SP; Patel NR; Naik RP; Soni HN; Patel B; Bhavsar MS; Narwaria MB; Thakker R
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2009 Jun; 19(3):234-40. PubMed ID: 19542853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
