These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1074 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22245150)

  • 1. A well-fixed femoral stem facing a failed acetabular component: to exchange or not? A 5- to 15-year follow-up study.
    de Thomasson E; Conso C; Mazel C
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2012 Feb; 98(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 22245150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Hip joint arthroplasty following surgical treatment of acetabular fracture].
    Pavelka T; Linhart M; Houcek P
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2006 Aug; 73(4):268-74. PubMed ID: 17026886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Uncemented jumbo cups for revision total hip arthroplasty: a concise follow-up, at a mean of twenty years, of a previous report.
    von Roth P; Abdel MP; Harmsen WS; Berry DJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Feb; 97(4):284-7. PubMed ID: 25695978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Müller acetabular reinforcement ring--still an option in acetabular revision of Paprosky 2 defects? Longterm results after 10 years.
    Kösters C; Schliemann B; Decking D; Simon U; Zurstegge M; Decking J
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2015 Jun; 81(2):257-63. PubMed ID: 26280965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mid-term results of total hip arthroplasty with the CementLess Spotorno (CLS) system.
    de Witte PB; Brand R; Vermeer HG; van der Heide HJ; Barnaart AF
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Jul; 93(13):1249-55. PubMed ID: 21776579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An analysis of stably fixed femoral components retained during revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Cho HJ; Han SB; Park JH; Park SW
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1239-44. PubMed ID: 21435820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The fate of stable cemented acetabular components retained during revision of a femoral component of a total hip arthroplasty.
    Berger RA; Quigley LR; Jacobs JJ; Sheinkop MB; Rosenberg AG; Galante JO
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Dec; 81(12):1682-91. PubMed ID: 10608379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty with Retained Acetabular Component.
    Adelani MA; Mall NA; Nyazee H; Clohisy JC; Barrack RL; Nunley RM
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Jun; 96(12):1015-1020. PubMed ID: 24951737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The medium term outcome of the Omnifit constrained acetabular cup.
    Bigsby E; Whitehouse MR; Bannister GC; Blom AW
    Hip Int; 2012; 22(5):505-10. PubMed ID: 23100150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of a constrained cementless acetabular component for instability in total hip replacement.
    Rady AE; Asal MK; Bassiony AA
    Hip Int; 2010; 20(4):434-9. PubMed ID: 21157746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tantalum Components in Difficult Acetabular Revisions Have Good Survival at 5 to 10 Years: Longer Term Followup of a Previous Report.
    Lachiewicz PF; O'Dell JA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):336-342. PubMed ID: 29529665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Revision total hip arthroplasty using a reconstruction cage device and a cemented dual mobility cup.
    Schneider L; Philippot R; Boyer B; Farizon F
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2011 Dec; 97(8):807-13. PubMed ID: 22119512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of cementless acetabular component with a hook and iliac flanges in revision arthroplasty for massive acetabular defect.
    Kim KC; Ha YC; Kang BJ; Lee YK; Ji HM; Koo KH
    J Orthop Sci; 2012 Jan; 17(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 22094605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does a titanium-coated polyethylene press-fit cup give reliable midterm results?
    Hooper N; Sargeant H; Frampton C; Hooper G
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3806-10. PubMed ID: 26373851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Long-term results of the CLS acetabular cup in primary total hip replacement].
    Rozkydal Z; Janícek P; Tomás T; Florian Z
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Apr; 76(2):90-7. PubMed ID: 19439127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High placement of an acetabular component inserted without cement in a revision total hip arthroplasty. Results after a mean of ten years.
    Dearborn JT; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Apr; 81(4):469-80. PubMed ID: 10225792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cement-in-cement femoral component revision in the multiply revised total hip arthroplasty: results with a minimum follow-up of five years.
    Sandiford NA; Jameson SS; Wilson MJ; Hubble MJ; Timperley AJ; Howell JR
    Bone Joint J; 2017 Feb; 99-B(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 28148661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ganz reinforcement ring for reconstruction of acetabular defects in revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Gerber A; Pisan M; Zurakowski D; Isler B
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Dec; 85(12):2358-64. PubMed ID: 14668505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What Is the Survivorship of Revision Surgery Performed for the Chronically Dislocated THA?
    Brown TS; McLaughlin RJ; Berry DJ; Lewallen DG; Trousdale RT; Sierra RJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Feb; 477(2):374-379. PubMed ID: 30794225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of porous tantalum components in Paprosky two and three acetabular revision. A minimum five-year follow-up of fifty one hips.
    Flecher X; Appy B; Parratte S; Ollivier M; Argenson JN
    Int Orthop; 2017 May; 41(5):911-916. PubMed ID: 27766385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 54.