These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22245714)

  • 1. Characteristics of detection thresholds and maximum comfortable loudness levels as a function of pulse rate in human cochlear implant users.
    Zhou N; Xu L; Pfingst BE
    Hear Res; 2012 Feb; 284(1-2):25-32. PubMed ID: 22245714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Psychometric functions and temporal integration in electric hearing.
    Donaldson GS; Viemeister NF; Nelson DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jun; 101(6):3706-21. PubMed ID: 9193058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparisons between detection threshold and loudness perception for individual cochlear implant channels.
    Bierer JA; Nye AD
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):641-51. PubMed ID: 25036146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detection of pulse trains in the electrically stimulated cochlea: effects of cochlear health.
    Pfingst BE; Colesa DJ; Hembrador S; Kang SY; Middlebrooks JC; Raphael Y; Su GL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Dec; 130(6):3954-68. PubMed ID: 22225050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the Effect of High Stimulation Rates on Temporal Loudness Integration in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Obando-Leitón M; Dietze A; Castañeda González CM; Saeedi A; Karg S; Hemmert W
    Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165231207229. PubMed ID: 37936420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating multipulse integration as a neural-health correlate in human cochlear-implant users: Relationship to spatial selectivity.
    Zhou N; Pfingst BE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Sep; 140(3):1537. PubMed ID: 27914377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relation between neural response telemetry thresholds, T- and C-levels, and loudness judgments in 12 adult nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients.
    Potts LG; Skinner MW; Gotter BD; Strube MJ; Brenner CA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):495-511. PubMed ID: 17609612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of phase duration and pulse rate on loudness and pitch percepts in the first auditory midbrain implant patients: Comparison to cochlear implant and auditory brainstem implant results.
    Lim HH; Lenarz T; Joseph G; Battmer RD; Patrick JF; Lenarz M
    Neuroscience; 2008 Jun; 154(1):370-80. PubMed ID: 18384971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating health of the implanted cochlea using psychophysical strength-duration functions and electrode configuration.
    Garadat SN; Colesa DJ; Swiderski DL; Raphael Y; Pfingst BE
    Hear Res; 2022 Feb; 414():108404. PubMed ID: 34883366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Psychophysical measures from electrical stimulation of the human cochlear nucleus.
    Shannon RV; Otto SR
    Hear Res; 1990 Aug; 47(1-2):159-68. PubMed ID: 2228792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Unanesthetized auditory cortex exhibits multiple codes for gaps in cochlear implant pulse trains.
    Kirby AE; Middlebrooks JC
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2012 Feb; 13(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 21969022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Variations in carrier pulse rate and the perception of amplitude modulation in cochlear implant users.
    Green T; Faulkner A; Rosen S
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):221-30. PubMed ID: 22367093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds and loudness estimates for the stimuli used to program the Advanced Bionics cochlear implant.
    Jeon EK; Brown CJ; Etler CP; O'Brien S; Chiou LK; Abbas PJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jan; 21(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 20085196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of pulse rate on thresholds and loudness of biphasic and alternating monophasic pulse trains in electrical hearing.
    van Wieringen A; Carlyon RP; Macherey O; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2006 Oct; 220(1-2):49-60. PubMed ID: 16904278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Integration of Pulse Trains in Humans and Guinea Pigs with Cochlear Implants.
    Zhou N; Kraft CT; Colesa DJ; Pfingst BE
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2015 Aug; 16(4):523-34. PubMed ID: 25990549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stimulus features affecting psychophysical detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea. I: Phase duration and stimulus duration.
    Pfingst BE; DeHaan DR; Holloway LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1857-66. PubMed ID: 1960279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Across-site variation in detection thresholds and maximum comfortable loudness levels for cochlear implants.
    Pfingst BE; Xu L
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2004 Mar; 5(1):11-24. PubMed ID: 14605920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating Multipulse Integration as a Neural-Health Correlate in Human Cochlear-Implant Users: Relationship to Psychometric Functions for Detection.
    Zhou N; Dong L
    Trends Hear; 2017 Jan; 21():2331216517690108. PubMed ID: 28150534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Forward masking patterns by low and high-rate stimulation in cochlear implant users: Differences in masking effectiveness and spread of neural excitation.
    Zhou N; Dong L; Dixon S
    Hear Res; 2020 Apr; 389():107921. PubMed ID: 32097828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Loudness growth in cochlear implants: effect of stimulation rate and electrode configuration.
    Fu QJ
    Hear Res; 2005 Apr; 202(1-2):55-62. PubMed ID: 15811699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.