300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22246048)
1. Impacted upper canines: examination and treatment proposal based on 3D versus 2D diagnosis.
Wriedt S; Jaklin J; Al-Nawas B; Wehrbein H
J Orofac Orthop; 2012 Jan; 73(1):28-40. PubMed ID: 22246048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption.
Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; Willems G
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 21270321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional localization of maxillary canines with cone-beam computed tomography.
Walker L; Enciso R; Mah J
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Oct; 128(4):418-23. PubMed ID: 16214621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability of different radiographic methods for the localization of displaced maxillary canines.
Tsolakis AI; Kalavritinos M; Bitsanis E; Sanoudos M; Benetou V; Alexiou K; Tsiklakis K
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Feb; 153(2):308-314. PubMed ID: 29407509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of impacted maxillary canines on root resorption of lateral incisors : A cone beam computed tomography study.
Ucar FI; Celebi AA; Tan E; Topcuoğlu T; Sekerci AE
J Orofac Orthop; 2017 May; 78(3):233-240. PubMed ID: 28204849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography and two-dimensional imaging methods in the 3D localization and assessment of maxillary impacted canines compared to the gold standard in-vivo readings: A cross-sectional study.
Alfailany DT; Shaweesh AI; Hajeer MY; Brad B; Alhaffar JB
Int Orthod; 2023 Sep; 21(3):100780. PubMed ID: 37290351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative analysis of traditional radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography volumetric images in the diagnosis and treatment planning of maxillary impacted canines.
Haney E; Gansky SA; Lee JS; Johnson E; Maki K; Miller AJ; Huang JC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):590-7. PubMed ID: 20451777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of CBCT-based interpretations of maxillary impacted canines compared to those of conventional radiography: An in vitro study.
Hajeer MY; Al-Homsi HK; Alfailany DT; Murad RMT
Int Orthod; 2022 Jun; 20(2):100639. PubMed ID: 35606269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Orthodontic treatment planning for impacted maxillary canines using conventional records versus 3D CBCT.
Alqerban A; Willems G; Bernaerts C; Vangastel J; Politis C; Jacobs R
Eur J Orthod; 2014 Dec; 36(6):698-707. PubMed ID: 24406479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predictors of root resorption associated with maxillary canine impaction in panoramic images.
Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; Willems G
Eur J Orthod; 2016 Jun; 38(3):292-9. PubMed ID: 26150321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pre-surgical treatment planning of maxillary canine impactions using panoramic vs cone beam CT imaging.
Alqerban A; Hedesiu M; Baciut M; Nackaerts O; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; ; Willems G
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(9):20130157. PubMed ID: 23906975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An Evaluation of Inter- and Intraobserver Reliability of Cone-beam Computed Tomography- and Two Dimensional-based Interpretations of Maxillary Canine Impactions using a Panel of Orthodontically Trained Observers.
Al-Homsi HK; Hajeer MY
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Aug; 16(8):648-56. PubMed ID: 26423501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Localization of impacted maxillary canines and root resorption of neighbouring teeth: a study assessing the diagnostic value of panoramic radiographs in two groups of observers.
Lai CS; Suter VG; Katsaros C; Bornstein MM
Eur J Orthod; 2014 Aug; 36(4):450-6. PubMed ID: 24123189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Two- versus three-dimensional imaging in subjects with unerupted maxillary canines.
Botticelli S; Verna C; Cattaneo PM; Heidmann J; Melsen B
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):344-9. PubMed ID: 21131389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictive factors for resorption of teeth adjacent to impacted maxillary canines.
Cuminetti F; Boutin F; Frapier L
Int Orthod; 2017 Mar; 15(1):54-68. PubMed ID: 28159386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional localization of impacted canines and root resorption assessment using cone beam computed tomography.
Almuhtaseb E; Mao J; Mahony D; Bader R; Zhang ZX
J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci; 2014 Jun; 34(3):425-430. PubMed ID: 24939311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of the root apex position of impacted maxillary canines on panoramic films.
Kim SH; Son WS; Yamaguchi T; Maki K; Kim SS; Park SB; Kim YI
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Oct; 152(4):489-493. PubMed ID: 28962733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of radiographic factors affecting surgical exposure and orthodontic alignment of impacted canines of the palate: a 15-year retrospective study.
Motamedi MH; Tabatabaie FA; Navi F; Shafeie HA; Fard BK; Hayati Z
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jun; 107(6):772-5. PubMed ID: 19201625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impacted and transmigrated mandibular canines: an analysis of 3D radiographic imaging data.
Bertl MH; Frey C; Bertl K; Giannis K; Gahleitner A; Strbac GD
Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Jul; 22(6):2389-2399. PubMed ID: 29392413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic accuracy of conventional orthodontic radiographic modalities and cone-beam computed tomography for localization of impacted maxillary canine teeth.
Salari B; Tofangchiha M; Padisar P; Reda R; Zanza A; Testarelli L
Sci Prog; 2024; 107(1):368504241228077. PubMed ID: 38359866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
