322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22246139)
1. Effects of dynamic-range compression on the spatial attributes of sounds in normal-hearing listeners.
Wiggins IM; Seeber BU
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):399-410. PubMed ID: 22246139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dynamic-range compression affects the lateral position of sounds.
Wiggins IM; Seeber BU
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Dec; 130(6):3939-53. PubMed ID: 22225049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of extreme adaptive frequency compression in bimodal listeners on sound localization and speech perception.
Veugen LCE; Chalupper J; Mens LHM; Snik AFM; van Opstal AJ
Cochlear Implants Int; 2017 Sep; 18(5):266-277. PubMed ID: 28726592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of age on F0 discrimination and intonation perception in simulated electric and electroacoustic hearing.
Souza P; Arehart K; Miller CW; Muralimanohar RK
Ear Hear; 2011 Feb; 32(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 20739892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Effect of Simulated Interaural Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking.
Goupell MJ; Stoelb CA; Kan A; Litovsky RY
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):895-905. PubMed ID: 29337763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Horizontal sound localization in cochlear implant users with a contralateral hearing aid.
Veugen LCE; Hendrikse MME; van Wanrooij MM; Agterberg MJH; Chalupper J; Mens LHM; Snik AFM; John van Opstal A
Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 336():72-82. PubMed ID: 27178443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of temporal fine structure and signal envelope on auditory motion perception.
Warnecke M; Peng ZE; Litovsky RY
PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0238125. PubMed ID: 32822439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of age on melody and timbre perception in simulations of electro-acoustic and cochlear-implant hearing.
Arehart KH; Croghan NB; Muralimanohar RK
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 24441739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of hearing-aid dynamic range compression on spatial perception in a reverberant environment.
Hassager HG; Wiinberg A; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2556. PubMed ID: 28464692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improved interaural timing of acoustic nerve stimulation affects sound localization in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users.
Seebacher J; Franke-Trieger A; Weichbold V; Zorowka P; Stephan K
Hear Res; 2019 Jan; 371():19-27. PubMed ID: 30439571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Binaural model-based dynamic-range compression.
Ernst SMA; Kortlang S; Grimm G; Bisitz T; Kollmeier B; Ewert SD
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S31-S42. PubMed ID: 29373937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hearing Asymmetry Biases Spatial Hearing in Bimodal Cochlear-Implant Users Despite Bilateral Low-Frequency Hearing Preservation.
Sharma S; H M Mens L; F M Snik A; van Opstal AJ; van Wanrooij MM
Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165221143907. PubMed ID: 36605011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of dynamic range compression on spatial selective auditory attention in normal-hearing listeners.
Schwartz AH; Shinn-Cunningham BG
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2329-39. PubMed ID: 23556599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of reverberation-related binaural cues in the externalization of speech.
Catic J; Santurette S; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Aug; 138(2):1154-67. PubMed ID: 26328729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing.
Williges B; Dietz M; Hohmann V; Jürgens T
Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interaural time discrimination of envelopes carried on high-frequency tones as a function of level and interaural carrier mismatch.
Blanks DA; Buss E; Grose JH; Fitzpatrick DC; Hall JW
Ear Hear; 2008 Oct; 29(5):674-83. PubMed ID: 18596646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Synchronized Automatic Gain Control in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Recipients Yields Significant Benefit in Static and Dynamic Listening Conditions.
Dwyer RT; Chen C; Hehrmann P; Dwyer NC; Gifford RH
Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211014139. PubMed ID: 34027718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sound Source Localization by Cochlear Implant Recipients with Normal Hearing in the Contralateral Ear: Effects of Spectral Content and Duration of Listening Experience.
Dillon MT; Rooth MA; Canfarotta MW; Richter ME; Thompson NJ; Brown KD
Audiol Neurootol; 2022; 27(6):437-448. PubMed ID: 35439753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners' Ability to Perceive Minimal Audible Angle Differences.
Zaleski-King A; Goupell MJ; Barac-Cikoja D; Bakke M
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Sep; 30(8):659-671. PubMed ID: 30417825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Labadie RF; Haynes DS
Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
