124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2224620)
1. Degenerative lumbar spine disorders in gradient refocused echo axial magnetic resonance images.
Murayama S; Numaguchi Y; Robinson AE
Clin Imaging; 1990 Aug; 14(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 2224620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The diagnosis of herniated intervertebral disks with MR imaging: a comparison of gradient-refocused-echo and spin-echo pulse sequences.
Murayama S; Numaguchi Y; Robinson AE
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1990; 11(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 2105601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Gradient-echo MR imaging of the lumbar spine: comparison with spin-echo technique.
Watanabe AT; Teitelbaum GP; Lufkin RB; Tsuruda JS; Jinkins JR; Bradley WG
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1990; 14(3):410-4. PubMed ID: 2335609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contrast on T2-weighted images of the lumbar spine using fast spin-echo and gated conventional spin-echo sequences.
Chappell PM; Glover GH; Enzmann DR
Neuroradiology; 1995 Apr; 37(3):183-6. PubMed ID: 7603591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Degenerative lumbar disk disease: pitfalls and usefulness of MR imaging in detection of vacuum phenomenon.
Grenier N; Grossman RI; Schiebler ML; Yeager BA; Goldberg HI; Kressel HY
Radiology; 1987 Sep; 164(3):861-5. PubMed ID: 3615888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Gradient echo imaging of the lumbar spine.
Wasenko JJ; Rosenbaum AE; Yu SF; Falen SW; Collins CS
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 1994; 18(5):357-65. PubMed ID: 7954312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison between magnetization transfer contrast and fast spin-echo MR imaging of degenerative disease of the cervical spine at 0.3 T.
Yoshioka H; Onaya H; Itai Y; Nishimura H; Matsumura A; Tsunoda T; Kandatsu S; Koga M; Yoshikawa K; Kato H; Tsujii H
Magn Reson Imaging; 1997; 15(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 9084023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of magnetization transfer for improved contrast on gradient-echo MR images of the cervical spine.
Finelli DA; Hurst GC; Karaman BA; Simon JE; Duerk JL; Bellon EM
Radiology; 1994 Oct; 193(1):165-71. PubMed ID: 8090886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MRI of the lumbar spine: comparison of 3D isotropic turbo spin-echo SPACE sequence versus conventional 2D sequences at 3.0 T.
Lee S; Jee WH; Jung JY; Lee SY; Ryu KS; Ha KY
Acta Radiol; 2015 Feb; 56(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 24553584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging: comparison between fast spin echo proton density and spin echo T1 axial scans.
Peh WC; Siu TH; Chan JH; Chan FL
Br J Radiol; 1998 May; 71(845):487-91. PubMed ID: 9691892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Glycosaminoglycan Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer of Lumbar Intervertebral Discs in Healthy Volunteers.
Schleich C; Müller-Lutz A; Eichner M; Schmitt B; Matuschke F; Bittersohl B; Zilkens C; Wittsack HJ; Antoch G; Miese F
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Jan; 41(2):146-52. PubMed ID: 26583472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Pathophysiology, neurology and diagnostic radiology of degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine].
Pöckler-Schöniger C; Wollanka H
Radiologe; 2007 Feb; 47(2):167-83; quiz 184-5. PubMed ID: 17285273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Magnetic resonance imaging for lumbar disk pathology. incidence of false negatives].
Berthelot JM; Maugars Y; Delecrin J; Caillon F; Prost A
Presse Med; 1995 Oct; 24(29):1329-31. PubMed ID: 7494842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Magnetic resonance imaging of diseased cervical and lumbar intervertebral discs].
Kadoya S; Nakamura T; Takarada A; Yamamoto I; Sato S
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo); 1989 Feb; 29(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 2475812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interrater and intrarater agreements of magnetic resonance imaging findings in the lumbar spine: significant variability across degenerative conditions.
Fu MC; Buerba RA; Long WD; Blizzard DJ; Lischuk AW; Haims AH; Grauer JN
Spine J; 2014 Oct; 14(10):2442-8. PubMed ID: 24642053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Calcification demonstrated as high signal intensity on T1-weighted MR images of the disks of the lumbar spine.
Major NM; Helms CA; Genant HK
Radiology; 1993 Nov; 189(2):494-6. PubMed ID: 8210379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MR pulse sequences for herniated disks.
Wiener J
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1996 Feb; 17(2):395-7; author reply 397. PubMed ID: 8938319
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine--comparison of multiple spin echo and low flip angle gradient echo imaging].
Murakami T; Fujita N; Harada K; Kozuka T
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Jul; 49(7):850-6. PubMed ID: 2798070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A diffusion and T2 relaxation MRI study of the ovine lumbar intervertebral disc under compression in vitro.
Drew SC; Silva P; Crozier S; Pearcy MJ
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Aug; 49(16):3585-92. PubMed ID: 15446789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnosis of Nerve Root Compromise of the Lumbar Spine: Evaluation of the Performance of Three-dimensional Isotropic T2-weighted Turbo Spin-Echo SPACE Sequence at 3T.
Sung J; Jee WH; Jung JY; Jang J; Kim JS; Kim YH; Ha KY
Korean J Radiol; 2017; 18(1):249-259. PubMed ID: 28096733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
