143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22246928)
1. Utility of the Thin Prep Imaging System® in the detection of squamous intraepithelial abnormalities on retrospective evaluation: can we trust the imager?
Barroeta JE; Reilly ME; Steinhoff MM; Lawrence WD
Diagn Cytopathol; 2012 Feb; 40(2):124-7. PubMed ID: 22246928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implementation of the ThinPrep Imaging System in a tertiary military medical center.
Duby JM; DiFurio MJ
Cancer; 2009 Aug; 117(4):264-70. PubMed ID: 19536887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Value of computer-assisted slide-screening system in ThinPrep cervical cytology].
Yang J; Tao K; Yang H; Guo ZH; Hu YM; Tan ZY
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Sep; 42(9):609-12. PubMed ID: 24314247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of liquid-based Pap tests: comparison of concurrent liquid-based tests and cervical biopsies on 782 women with previously abnormal Pap smears.
Guo M; Hu L; Martin L; Liu S; Baliga M; Hughson MD
Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 15839615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A feasibility study of the AutoPap system location-guided screening.
Lee JS; Kuan L; Oh S; Patten FW; Wilbur DC
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):221-6. PubMed ID: 9479344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implementation of the ThinPrep imaging system in a high-volume metropolitan laboratory.
Miller FS; Nagel LE; Kenny-Moynihan MB
Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Apr; 35(4):213-7. PubMed ID: 17351933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Utility of p16 Immunohistochemistry in Evaluating Negative Cervical Biopsies Following High-risk Pap Test Results.
Shain AF; Kwok S; Folkins AK; Kong CS
Am J Surg Pathol; 2018 Jan; 42(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 29112019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative analysis of cervical cytology screening methods and staining protocols for detection rate and accurate interpretation of ASC-H: Data from a high-volume laboratory in Turkey.
Ozlem A; Umit I
Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 Nov; 43(11):863-9. PubMed ID: 26173757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of an imaging system vs. manual screening in the detection of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the uterine cervix.
Dziura B; Quinn S; Richard K
Acta Cytol; 2006; 50(3):309-11. PubMed ID: 16780026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of Thin Prep(®) imaging system on laboratory rate and relative sensitivity of atypical squamous cells, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion not excluded and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion interpretations.
Koltz BR; Russell DK; Lu N; Bonfiglio TA; Varghese S
Cytojournal; 2013; 10():6. PubMed ID: 23599725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and tumors using the AutoPap System: results of a primary screening clinical trial.
Wilbur DC; Prey MU; Miller WM; Pawlick GF; Colgan TJ; Dax Taylor D
Cancer; 1999 Dec; 87(6):354-8. PubMed ID: 10603189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Negative computer-imaged ThinPrep Pap test and positive hybrid capture2 HPV co-testing results: A quality assurance review.
Rao R; Molina D; Halligan AM; Vakil B; Alperstein SA; Hoda RS
Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 Sep; 43(9):763-9. PubMed ID: 26173579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Multi-Institutional Feasibility Study on the Use of Automated Screening Systems for Quality Control Rescreening of Cervical Cytology.
Sugiyama Y; Sasaki H; Komatsu K; Yabushita R; Oda M; Yanoh K; Ueda M; Itamochi H; Okugawa K; Fujita H; Tase T; Nakatani E; Moriya T
Acta Cytol; 2016; 60(5):451-457. PubMed ID: 27673689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of computer-assisted and manual screening of cervical cytology.
Lozano R
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Jan; 104(1):134-8. PubMed ID: 16959306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix: screening and diagnostic errors in Papanicolaou smears.
Ruba S; Schoolland M; Allpress S; Sterrett G
Cancer; 2004 Oct; 102(5):280-7. PubMed ID: 15376198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Neural-network-assisted analysis and microscopic rescreening in presumed negative cervical cytologic smears. A comparison.
Mango LJ; Valente PT
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):227-32. PubMed ID: 9479345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effectiveness of the ThinPrep Imaging System in the detection of abnormal cervicovaginal cytology: a practical experience in Korea.
Ha SY; Lee YK; Oh YL
Acta Cytol; 2013; 57(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 23406895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. HSIL, epithelial cell abnormality-adjusted workload, and the Thinprep imaging system.
Renshaw AA; Elsheikh TM
Diagn Cytopathol; 2012 Mar; 40(3):201-3. PubMed ID: 22334521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Introduction of the Thin Prep Imaging System (TIS): experience in a high volume academic practice.
Chivukula M; Saad RS; Elishaev E; White S; Mauser N; Dabbs DJ
Cytojournal; 2007 Feb; 4():6. PubMed ID: 17288596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Morphologic analysis of false negative SurePath® slides using Focalpoint™ GS computer-assisted cervical screening technology: An Australian experience.
Bowditch RC; Clarke JM; Baird PJ; Greenberg ML
Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 Nov; 43(11):870-8. PubMed ID: 26174002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
