These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22247632)

  • 1. High-definition computed tomography for coronary artery stent imaging: a phantom study.
    Yang WJ; Chen KM; Pang LF; Guo Y; Li JY; Zhang H; Pan ZL
    Korean J Radiol; 2012; 13(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 22247632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High-definition computed tomography for coronary artery stents imaging compared with standard-definition 64-row multidectector computed tomography: an initial in vivo study.
    Yang WJ; Zhang H; Xiao H; Li JY; Liu Y; Pan ZL; Chen KM
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(3):295-300. PubMed ID: 22592611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The comparison of high and standard definition computed tomography techniques regarding coronary artery imaging.
    Aykut A; Bumin D; Omer Y; Mustafa K; Meltem C; Orhan C; Nisa U; Hikmet O; Hakan D; Mert K
    Afr Health Sci; 2015 Sep; 15(3):925-30. PubMed ID: 26957983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multidetector computed tomography for coronary stents imaging: high-voltage (140-kVp) prospective ECG-triggered versus standard-voltage (120-kVp) retrospective ECG-gated helical scanning.
    Esposito A; Colantoni C; De Cobelli F; Del Vecchio A; Palmisano A; Calandrino R; Del Maschio A
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(3):395-401. PubMed ID: 23674011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High-definition multidetector computed tomography for evaluation of coronary artery stents: comparison to standard-definition 64-detector row computed tomography.
    Min JK; Swaminathan RV; Vass M; Gallagher S; Weinsaft JW
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2009; 3(4):246-51. PubMed ID: 19577213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. First in vivo head-to-head comparison of high-definition versus standard-definition stent imaging with 64-slice computed tomography.
    Fuchs TA; Stehli J; Fiechter M; Dougoud S; Sah BR; Gebhard C; Bull S; Gaemperli O; Kaufmann PA
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Aug; 29(6):1409-16. PubMed ID: 23636300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Coronary artery stent evaluation using a vascular model at 64-detector row CT: comparison between prospective and retrospective ECG-gated axial scans.
    Suzuki S; Furui S; Kuwahara S; Mehta D; Kaminaga T; Miyazawa A; Ueno Y; Konno K
    Korean J Radiol; 2009; 10(3):217-26. PubMed ID: 19412509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. High-definition computed tomography for coronary artery stents: image quality and radiation doses for low voltage (100 kVp) and standard voltage (120 kVp) ECG-triggered scanning.
    Lee JW; Kim CW; Lee HC; Wu MT; Hwangbo L; Choo KS; Kim JH; Lee KN; Kim JY; Jeong YJ
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jun; 31 Suppl 1():39-49. PubMed ID: 26022439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prospective ECG-triggered axial CT at 140-kV tube voltage improves coronary in-stent restenosis visibility at a lower radiation dose compared with conventional retrospective ECG-gated helical CT.
    Horiguchi J; Fujioka C; Kiguchi M; Yamamoto H; Kitagawa T; Kohno S; Ito K
    Eur Radiol; 2009 Oct; 19(10):2363-72. PubMed ID: 19430797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improvement of in-stent lumen measurement accuracy with new high-definition CT in a phantom model: comparison with conventional 64-detector row CT.
    Tanami Y; Jinzaki M; Yamada M; Imai Y; Segawa K; Kuribayashi S
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Feb; 28(2):337-42. PubMed ID: 21222034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of coronary artery in-stent restenosis with prospectively ECG-triggered axial CT angiography versus retrospective technique: a phantom study.
    Yang WJ; Pan ZL; Zhang H; Pang LF; Guo Y; Chen KM
    Radiol Med; 2011 Mar; 116(2):189-96. PubMed ID: 21076885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Saving dose in triple-rule-out computed tomography examination using a high-pitch dual spiral technique.
    Sommer WH; Schenzle JC; Becker CR; Nikolaou K; Graser A; Michalski G; Neumaier K; Reiser MF; Johnson TR
    Invest Radiol; 2010 Feb; 45(2):64-71. PubMed ID: 20027121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Photon-Counting CT: High-Resolution Imaging of Coronary Stents.
    Mannil M; Hickethier T; von Spiczak J; Baer M; Henning A; Hertel M; Schmidt B; Flohr T; Maintz D; Alkadhi H
    Invest Radiol; 2018 Mar; 53(3):143-149. PubMed ID: 28945655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiation reduction with prospective ECG-triggering acquisition using 64-multidetector Computed Tomographic angiography.
    Gopal A; Mao SS; Karlsberg D; Young E; Waggoner J; Ahmadi N; Pal RS; Leal J; Karlsberg RP; Budoff MJ
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2009 Apr; 25(4):405-16. PubMed ID: 19051055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Coronary stent patency: dual-energy multidetector CT assessment in a pilot study with anthropomorphic phantom.
    Boll DT; Merkle EM; Paulson EK; Fleiter TR
    Radiology; 2008 Jun; 247(3):687-95. PubMed ID: 18424688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of an Anthropomorphic Chest Model to Evaluate Multiple Scanning Protocols for High-Definition and Standard-Definition Computed Tomography to Detect Small Pulmonary Nodules.
    Jin L; Sun Y; Li M
    Med Sci Monit; 2019 Mar; 25():2195-2205. PubMed ID: 30907379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Monoenergetic reconstructions for imaging of coronary artery stents using spectral detector CT: In-vitro experience and comparison to conventional images.
    Hickethier T; Baeßler B; Kroeger JR; Doerner J; Pahn G; Maintz D; Michels G; Bunck AC
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(1):33-39. PubMed ID: 28096049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro evaluation of coronary stents and in-stent stenosis using a dynamic cardiac phantom and a 64-detector row CT scanner.
    Schlosser T; Scheuermann T; Ulzheimer S; Mohrs OK; Kühling M; Albrecht PE; Voigtländer T; Barkhausen J; Schmermund A
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2007 Dec; 96(12):883-90. PubMed ID: 17694381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. High-definition computed tomography for coronary artery stents imaging: Initial evaluation of the optimal reconstruction algorithm.
    Cui X; Li T; Li X; Zhou W
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 May; 84(5):834-9. PubMed ID: 25743247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Image quality in low-dose coronary computed tomography angiography with a new high-definition CT scanner.
    Kazakauskaite E; Husmann L; Stehli J; Fuchs T; Fiechter M; Klaeser B; Ghadri JR; Gebhard C; Gaemperli O; Kaufmann PA
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Feb; 29(2):471-7. PubMed ID: 22825255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.