These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22247663)
1. Design of sensor data processing steps in an air pollution monitoring system. Jung YJ; Lee YK; Lee DG; Lee Y; Nittel S; Beard K; Nam KW; Ryu KH Sensors (Basel); 2011; 11(12):11235-50. PubMed ID: 22247663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Survey of Wireless Sensor Network Based Air Pollution Monitoring Systems. Yi WY; Lo KM; Mak T; Leung KS; Leung Y; Meng ML Sensors (Basel); 2015 Dec; 15(12):31392-427. PubMed ID: 26703598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ubiquitous Sensor Networking for Development (USN4D): an application to pollution monitoring. Bagula A; Zennaro M; Inggs G; Scott S; Gascon D Sensors (Basel); 2012; 12(1):391-414. PubMed ID: 22368476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of the congestion charging scheme on air quality in London. Part 1. Emissions modeling and analysis of air pollution measurements. Kelly F; Anderson HR; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Barratt B; Beevers S; Derwent D; Green D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P; Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Apr; (155):5-71. PubMed ID: 21830496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mapping real-time air pollution health risk for environmental management: Combining mobile and stationary air pollution monitoring with neural network models. Adams MD; Kanaroglou PS J Environ Manage; 2016 Mar; 168():133-41. PubMed ID: 26706225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Social media as a sensor of air quality and public response in China. Wang S; Paul MJ; Dredze M J Med Internet Res; 2015 Mar; 17(3):e22. PubMed ID: 25831020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can commercial low-cost sensor platforms contribute to air quality monitoring and exposure estimates? Castell N; Dauge FR; Schneider P; Vogt M; Lerner U; Fishbain B; Broday D; Bartonova A Environ Int; 2017 Feb; 99():293-302. PubMed ID: 28038970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preserving air pollution forest archives accessible through dendrochemistry. Alterio E; Cocozza C; Chirici G; Rizzi A; Sitzia T J Environ Manage; 2020 Jun; 264():110462. PubMed ID: 32250895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A multi-objective assessment of an air quality monitoring network using environmental, economic, and social indicators and GIS-based models. Pope R; Wu J J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2014 Jun; 64(6):721-37. PubMed ID: 25039205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States. Paciorek CJ; Liu Y; Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Modular Plug-And-Play Sensor System for Urban Air Pollution Monitoring: Design, Implementation and Evaluation. Yi WY; Leung KS; Leung Y Sensors (Basel); 2017 Dec; 18(1):. PubMed ID: 29271952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The expanding scope of air pollution monitoring can facilitate sustainable development. Knox A; Mykhaylova N; Evans GJ; Lee CJ; Karney B; Brook JR Sci Total Environ; 2013 Mar; 448():189-96. PubMed ID: 23040176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Advances in science and applications of air pollution monitoring: A case study on oil sands monitoring targeting ecosystem protection. Brook JR; Cober SG; Freemark M; Harner T; Li SM; Liggio J; Makar P; Pauli B J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2019 Jun; 69(6):661-709. PubMed ID: 31082314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of a weak typhoon on the vertical distribution of air pollution in Hong Kong: A perspective from a Doppler LiDAR network. Huang T; Yang Y; O'Connor EJ; Lolli S; Haywood J; Osborne M; Cheng JC; Guo J; Yim SH Environ Pollut; 2021 May; 276():116534. PubMed ID: 33611194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The changing paradigm of air pollution monitoring. Snyder EG; Watkins TH; Solomon PA; Thoma ED; Williams RW; Hagler GS; Shelow D; Hindin DA; Kilaru VJ; Preuss PW Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Oct; 47(20):11369-77. PubMed ID: 23980922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Information Theory Solution Approach to the Air Pollution Sensor Location-Allocation Problem. Mano Z; Kendler S; Fishbain B Sensors (Basel); 2022 May; 22(10):. PubMed ID: 35632218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Towards an integrated framework for air quality monitoring and exposure estimation-a review. Singla S; Bansal D; Misra A; Raheja G Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Aug; 190(9):562. PubMed ID: 30167891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Combining physiological, environmental and locational sensors for citizen-oriented health applications. Huck JJ; Whyatt JD; Coulton P; Davison B; Gradinar A Environ Monit Assess; 2017 Mar; 189(3):114. PubMed ID: 28210895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A survey of geosensor networks: advances in dynamic environmental monitoring. Nittel S Sensors (Basel); 2009; 9(7):5664-78. PubMed ID: 22346721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Advantages and challenges of the implementation of a low-cost particulate matter monitoring system as a decision-making tool. Caquilpán P V; Aros G G; Elgueta A S; Díaz S R; Sepúlveda K G; Sierralta J C Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Oct; 191(11):667. PubMed ID: 31650385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]