These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22249115)

  • 1. Do false belief and verb non-factivity share similar neural circuits?
    Chen L; Cheung H; Szeto CY; Zhu Z; Wang S
    Neurosci Lett; 2012 Feb; 510(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 22249115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. False belief and verb non-factivity: a common neural basis?
    Cheung H; Chen L; Szeto CY; Feng G; Lu G; Zhang Z; Zhu Z; Wang S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Mar; 83(3):357-64. PubMed ID: 22206905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relations between verb factivity and first-order and second-order false belief understanding: Evidence from Mandarin-speaking typically developing children and children with autism spectrum disorders.
    Li H; Leung MT
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2020; 34(1-2):185-200. PubMed ID: 31262203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrophysiological evidence for the time-course of verifying text ideas.
    Ferretti TR; Singer M; Patterson C
    Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):881-8. PubMed ID: 18675957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. False belief reasoning in the brain: an ERP study.
    Wang Y; Liu Y; Gao Y; Chen J; Zhang W; Lin C
    Sci China C Life Sci; 2008 Jan; 51(1):72-9. PubMed ID: 18176794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relations between mental verb and false belief understanding in Cantonese-speaking children.
    Cheung H; Chen HC; Yeung W
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Oct; 104(2):141-55. PubMed ID: 19524253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What we know about knowing: Presuppositions generated by factive verbs influence downstream neural processing.
    Shetreet E; Alexander EJ; Romoli J; Chierchia G; Kuperberg G
    Cognition; 2019 Mar; 184():96-106. PubMed ID: 30584974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Context-sensitive neural responses to conflict resolution: electrophysiological evidence from subject-object ambiguities in language comprehension.
    Schlesewsky M; Bornkessel I
    Brain Res; 2006 Jul; 1098(1):139-52. PubMed ID: 16765335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Deception dissociates from false belief reasoning in deaf children: implications for the implicit versus explicit theory of mind distinction.
    de Villiers PA; de Villiers JG
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2012 Mar; 30(Pt 1):188-209. PubMed ID: 22429041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distinct neural correlates underlying pretense and false belief reasoning: evidence from ERPs.
    Meinhardt J; Kühn-Popp N; Sommer M; Sodian B
    Neuroimage; 2012 Nov; 63(2):623-31. PubMed ID: 22813953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Same or different? ERP correlates of pretense and false belief reasoning in children.
    Kühn-Popp N; Sodian B; Sommer M; Döhnel K; Meinhardt J
    Neuroscience; 2013 Sep; 248():488-98. PubMed ID: 23806717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence of syntactic priming in sentence comprehension.
    Tooley KM; Traxler MJ; Swaab TY
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):19-45. PubMed ID: 19210079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The semantic processing of syntactic structure in sentence comprehension: an ERP study.
    Ye Z; Zhan W; Zhou X
    Brain Res; 2007 Apr; 1142():135-45. PubMed ID: 17303093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bridging the gap between implicit and explicit understanding: how language development promotes the processing and representation of false belief.
    San Juan V; Astington JW
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2012 Mar; 30(Pt 1):105-22. PubMed ID: 22429036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Functional activity of the right temporo-parietal junction and of the medial prefrontal cortex associated with true and false belief reasoning.
    Döhnel K; Schuwerk T; Meinhardt J; Sodian B; Hajak G; Sommer M
    Neuroimage; 2012 Apr; 60(3):1652-61. PubMed ID: 22300812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mental representation of verb meaning: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Li X; Shu H; Liu Y; Li P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Oct; 18(10):1774-87. PubMed ID: 17014380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The contribution of theory of mind, counterfactual reasoning, and executive function to pre-readers' language comprehension and later reading awareness and comprehension in elementary school.
    Guajardo NR; Cartwright KB
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2016 Apr; 144():27-45. PubMed ID: 26689129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inhibiting one's own knowledge in false belief reasoning: an ERP study.
    Zhang T; Sha W; Zheng X; Ouyang H; Li H
    Neurosci Lett; 2009 Dec; 467(3):194-8. PubMed ID: 19818724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Thinking while talking: adults fail nonverbal false-belief reasoning.
    Newton AM; de Villiers JG
    Psychol Sci; 2007 Jul; 18(7):574-9. PubMed ID: 17614864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modulation of the cortical false belief network during development.
    Sommer M; Meinhardt J; Eichenmüller K; Sodian B; Döhnel K; Hajak G
    Brain Res; 2010 Oct; 1354():123-31. PubMed ID: 20678489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.