These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

369 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22249297)

  • 1. Who participates in the Dutch Chlamydia screening? A study on demographic and behavioral correlates of participation and positivity.
    Op de Coul EL; Götz HM; van Bergen JE; Fennema JS; Hoebe CJ; Koekenbier RH; Pars LL; van Ravesteijn SM; van der Sande MA; van den Broek IV
    Sex Transm Dis; 2012 Feb; 39(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 22249297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acceptability of the internet-based Chlamydia screening implementation in the Netherlands and insights into nonresponse.
    Greenland KE; Op de Coul EL; van Bergen JE; Brouwers EE; Fennema HJ; Götz HM; Hoebe CJ; Koekenbier RH; Pars LL; van Ravesteijn SM; van den Broek IV
    Sex Transm Dis; 2011 Jun; 38(6):467-74. PubMed ID: 21217416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Risk factors for Clamydia infections of the genital organs in adolescent females].
    Sedlecki K; Markovic M; Rajic G
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2001; 129(7-8):169-74. PubMed ID: 11797445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Opportunistic screening for genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis among the sexually active population of Amsterdam. Il Over 90% participation and almost 5% prevalence].
    van den Hoek JA; Mulder-Folkerts DK; Coutinho RA; Dukers NH; Buimer M; van Doornum GJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Mar; 143(13):668-72. PubMed ID: 10321299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The English National Chlamydia Screening Programme: variations in positivity in 2007/2008.
    Simms I; Talebi A; Rhia J; Horner P; French RS; Sarah R; Macintosh M
    Sex Transm Dis; 2009 Aug; 36(8):522-7. PubMed ID: 19455079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Systematic selection of screening participants by risk score in a Chlamydia screening programme is feasible and effective.
    van den Broek IV; Brouwers EE; Götz HM; van Bergen JE; Op de Coul EL; Fennema JS; Koekenbier RH; Pars LL; van Ravesteijn SM; Hoebe CJ
    Sex Transm Infect; 2012 Apr; 88(3):205-11. PubMed ID: 22215696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk factors for Chlamydia trachomatis infection among users of an internet-based testing service in Sweden.
    Novak M; Novak D
    Sex Reprod Healthc; 2013 Mar; 4(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 23427929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A prediction rule for selective screening of Chlamydia trachomatis infection.
    Götz HM; van Bergen JE; Veldhuijzen IK; Broer J; Hoebe CJ; Steyerberg EW; Coenen AJ; de Groot F; Verhooren MJ; van Schaik DT; Richardus JH
    Sex Transm Infect; 2005 Feb; 81(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 15681717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Chlamydia positivity in American Indian/Alaska Native women screened in family planning clinics, 1997-2004.
    Gorgos L; Fine D; Marrazzo J
    Sex Transm Dis; 2008 Aug; 35(8):753-7. PubMed ID: 18449068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patterns of chlamydia/gonorrhea positivity among voluntarily screened New York City public high school students.
    Han JS; Rogers ME; Nurani S; Rubin S; Blank S
    J Adolesc Health; 2011 Sep; 49(3):252-7. PubMed ID: 21856516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Risk assessment and other screening options for gonorrhoea and chlamydial infections in women attending rural Tanzanian antenatal clinics.
    Mayaud P; Grosskurth H; Changalucha J; Todd J; West B; Gabone R; Senkoro K; Rusizoka M; Laga M; Hayes R
    Bull World Health Organ; 1995; 73(5):621-30. PubMed ID: 8846488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Chlamydia trachomatis infections in multi-ethnic urban youth: a pilot combining STI health education and outreach testing in Rotterdam, Netherlands.
    Götz HM; Veldhuijzen IK; Ossewaarde JM; de Zwart O; Richardus JH
    Sex Transm Infect; 2006 Apr; 82(2):148-52; discussion 152-3. PubMed ID: 16581743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women and the use of oral contraceptives].
    van Voorst Vader PC; Lier JG; Posma AL; Schröder FP; Schirm J; Kauer FM
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1991 Feb; 135(8):323-7. PubMed ID: 2008220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Chlamydia test results were associated with sexual risk behavior change among participants of the Chlamydia screening implementation in The Netherlands.
    Soetens LC; van Benthem BH; Op de Coul EL
    Sex Transm Dis; 2015 Mar; 42(3):109-14. PubMed ID: 25668640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of Chlamydia trachomatis infection to facilitate selective screening on population and individual level: a cross-sectional study of a population-based screening programme.
    van Klaveren D; Götz HM; Op de Coul EL; Steyerberg EW; Vergouwe Y
    Sex Transm Infect; 2016 Sep; 92(6):433-40. PubMed ID: 26843401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The program cost and cost-effectiveness of screening men for Chlamydia to prevent pelvic inflammatory disease in women.
    Gift TL; Gaydos CA; Kent CK; Marrazzo JM; Rietmeijer CA; Schillinger JA; Dunne EF
    Sex Transm Dis; 2008 Nov; 35(11 Suppl):S66-75. PubMed ID: 18830137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term trends in Chlamydia trachomatis infections and related outcomes in a U.S. managed care population.
    Scholes D; Satterwhite CL; Yu O; Fine D; Weinstock H; Berman S
    Sex Transm Dis; 2012 Feb; 39(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 22249294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Internet-based screening for Chlamydia trachomatis to reach non-clinic populations with mailed self-administered vaginal swabs.
    Gaydos CA; Dwyer K; Barnes M; Rizzo-Price PA; Wood BJ; Flemming T; Hogan MT
    Sex Transm Dis; 2006 Jul; 33(7):451-7. PubMed ID: 16652069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sociodemographic markers and behavioral correlates of sexually transmitted infections in a nonclinical sample of adolescent and young adult women.
    Boyer CB; Shafer MA; Pollack LM; Canchola J; Moncada J; Schachter J
    J Infect Dis; 2006 Aug; 194(3):307-15. PubMed ID: 16826478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of screening and partner notification on Chlamydia positivity in the United States: a modeling study.
    Kretzschmar M; Satterwhite C; Leichliter J; Berman S
    Sex Transm Dis; 2012 May; 39(5):325-31. PubMed ID: 22504590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.