These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2224970)

  • 1. [Contribution of automatic sphygmomanometers for one-time measurement of blood pressure].
    Slabý A; Josífko M
    Cas Lek Cesk; 1990 Aug; 129(35):1107-10. PubMed ID: 2224970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does sequential automated measurement improve the estimate of resting blood pressure?
    Slabý A; Josífko M
    J Hum Hypertens; 1992 Feb; 6(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 1583628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical evaluation of the Nippon Colin BP-103N blood pressure monitor.
    Slabý A; Arenberger P; Josífko M; Hrabák P
    J Hum Hypertens; 1987 Jun; 1(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 3508193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of noninvasive oscillometric and intra-arterial blood pressure measurements in hyperacute stroke.
    Manios E; Vemmos K; Tsivgoulis G; Barlas G; Koroboki E; Spengos K; Zakopoulos N
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Jun; 12(3):149-56. PubMed ID: 17496464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Random zero sphygmomanometer versus automatic oscillometric blood pressure monitor; is either the instrument of choice?
    Goonasekera CD; Dillon MJ
    J Hum Hypertens; 1995 Nov; 9(11):885-9. PubMed ID: 8583467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Oscillometric blood pressure measurement used for calibration of the arterial tonometry method contributes significantly to error.
    Hansen S; Staber M
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2006 Sep; 23(9):781-7. PubMed ID: 16723049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of an oscillometric device for monitoring blood pressure in dialysis patients.
    Lodi CA; Estridge C; Ghidini C
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2007 Oct; 22(10):2950-61. PubMed ID: 17556423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Quality assurance in Riva-Rocci blood pressure measurement: simultaneous sphygmomanometry with open and covered pressure display].
    Hartmann B; Weise H; Bassenge E
    Z Kardiol; 1988 Aug; 77(8):537-42. PubMed ID: 3176598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Evaluation of an automatic sphygmomanometer].
    Slabý A; Arenberger P; Josífko M; Hrabák P
    Sb Lek; 1989 Sep; 91(8):274-84. PubMed ID: 2617128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical validation of an automatic device measuring blood pressure in the fingers.
    Arosio E; Zannoni M
    Panminerva Med; 1999 Jun; 41(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 10479914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Age-based differences between mercury sphygmomanometer and pulse dynamic blood pressure measurements.
    Brinton TJ; Walls ED; Yajnik AK; Chio SS
    Blood Press Monit; 1998 Apr; 3(2):125-129. PubMed ID: 10212342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of methods for improving precision of blood pressure measurements in phase I clinical trials.
    Terra SG; Blum RA; Wei GC; Lew RA; Digenio AG; Rajman I; Kazierad DJ
    J Clin Pharmacol; 2004 May; 44(5):457-63. PubMed ID: 15102865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of clothes on sphygmomanometric and oscillometric blood pressure measurement.
    Liebl M; Holzgreve H; Schulz M; Crispin A; Bogner J
    Blood Press; 2004; 13(5):279-82. PubMed ID: 15545150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Dinamap PRO-100 and mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements in a population-based study.
    Ni H; Wu C; Prineas R; Shea S; Liu K; Kronmal R; Bild D
    Am J Hypertens; 2006 Apr; 19(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 16580569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of two automatic devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension: the Omron M6 (HEM-7001-E) and the Omron R7 (HEM 637-IT).
    Topouchian JA; El Assaad MA; Orobinskaia LV; El Feghali RN; Asmar RG
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Jun; 11(3):165-71. PubMed ID: 16702826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Measurement of arterial pressure using 3 measurement methods in medial arterial calcification].
    Thierry FX; Dueymes JM; Vernier I; Barbe P; Berg P; Dumazer P; Lumbroso C; Conte JJ
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1989 Jul; 82(7):1007-11. PubMed ID: 2510622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of TM-2655 oscillometric device for blood pressure measurement.
    Kobalava ZD; Kotovskaya YV; Babaeva LA; Moiseev VS
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 16534410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
    Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Increase in blood pressure reproducibility by repeated semi-automatic blood pressure measurements in the clinic environment.
    Mancia G; Ulian L; Parati G; Trazzi S
    J Hypertens; 1994 Apr; 12(4):469-73. PubMed ID: 8064172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimum frequency of office blood pressure measurement using an automated sphygmomanometer.
    Myers MG; Valdivieso M; Kiss A
    Blood Press Monit; 2008 Dec; 13(6):333-8. PubMed ID: 19020423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.