87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22250667)
1. Testing the efficacy of a new procedure for reducing faking on personality tests within selection contexts.
Fan J; Gao D; Carroll SA; Lopez FJ; Tian TS; Meng H
J Appl Psychol; 2012 Jul; 97(4):866-80. PubMed ID: 22250667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Applicant reactions and faking in real-life personnel selection.
Honkaniemi L; Tolvanen A; Feldt T
Scand J Psychol; 2011 Aug; 52(4):376-81. PubMed ID: 21752026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Retesting after initial failure, coaching rumors, and warnings against faking in online personality measures for selection.
Landers RN; Sackett PR; Tuzinski KA
J Appl Psychol; 2011 Jan; 96(1):202-10. PubMed ID: 20718510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of emotions as mechanisms of mid-test warning messages during personality testing: A field experiment.
Li H; Fan J; Zhao G; Wang M; Zheng L; Meng H; Weng QD; Liu Y; Lievens F
J Appl Psychol; 2022 Jan; 107(1):40-59. PubMed ID: 33630620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Faking good: self-enhancement in medical school applicants.
Griffin B; Wilson IG
Med Educ; 2012 May; 46(5):485-90. PubMed ID: 22515756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Faking and the validity of conscientiousness: a Monte Carlo investigation.
Komar S; Brown DJ; Komar JA; Robie C
J Appl Psychol; 2008 Jan; 93(1):140-54. PubMed ID: 18211141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. APPLICANTS' STRATEGIC USE OF EXTREME OR MIDPOINT RESPONSES WHEN FAKING PERSONALITY TESTS.
König CJ; Mura M; Schmidt J
Psychol Rep; 2015 Oct; 117(2):429-36. PubMed ID: 26444843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Psychometric Costs of Applicants' Faking: Examining Measurement Invariance and Retest Correlations Across Response Conditions.
Krammer G; Sommer M; Arendasy ME
J Pers Assess; 2017; 99(5):510-523. PubMed ID: 28300431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retesting personality in employee selection: implications of the context, sample, and setting.
Holladay CL; David E; Johnson SK
Psychol Rep; 2013 Apr; 112(2):486-501. PubMed ID: 23833877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of warning strategies to reduce faking during military recruitment.
Feeney JR; Goffin RD; Kemp C; Beshai S; Klammer JD
Mil Psychol; 2023 Aug; ():1-11. PubMed ID: 37640383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intentional response distortion on personality tests: using eye-tracking to understand response processes when faking.
van Hooft EA; Born MP
J Appl Psychol; 2012 Mar; 97(2):301-16. PubMed ID: 21967296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Liar! Liar! (when stakes are higher): Understanding how the overclaiming technique can be used to measure faking in personnel selection.
Dunlop PD; Bourdage JS; de Vries RE; McNeill IM; Jorritsma K; Orchard M; Austen T; Baines T; Choe WK
J Appl Psychol; 2020 Aug; 105(8):784-799. PubMed ID: 31714104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correction for faking in self-report personality tests.
Sjöberg L
Scand J Psychol; 2015 Oct; 56(5):582-91. PubMed ID: 26043667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Item placement on a personality measure: effects on faking behavior and test measurement properties.
McFarland LA; Ryan AM; Ellis A
J Pers Assess; 2002 Apr; 78(2):348-69. PubMed ID: 12067198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Can mock interviewers' personalities influence their personality ratings of applicants?
Hilliard T; Macan T
J Psychol; 2009 Mar; 143(2):161-74. PubMed ID: 19306679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pre-employment integrity testing across multiple industries.
Fine S
Psychol Rep; 2010 Oct; 107(2):607-10. PubMed ID: 21117489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of faking on the MMPI-2: differentiation among faking-bad, denial, and claiming extreme virtue.
Lim J; Butcher JN
J Pers Assess; 1996 Aug; 67(1):1-25. PubMed ID: 16367656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Objective detection of faking on role-play tests of assertion: gender differences.
Kern JM
Psychol Rep; 1996 Apr; 78(2):355-61. PubMed ID: 9148285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Personality measurement, faking, and employment selection.
Hogan J; Barrett P; Hogan R
J Appl Psychol; 2007 Sep; 92(5):1270-85. PubMed ID: 17845085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Deterring malingered psychopathology: The effect of warning simulating malingerers.
King J; Sullivan KA
Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(1):35-49. PubMed ID: 19156679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
