These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

366 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22250865)

  • 1. Measuring the interrelations among multiple paradigms of visual attention: an individual differences approach.
    Huang L; Mo L; Li Y
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):414-28. PubMed ID: 22250865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Task-based working memory guidance of visual attention.
    Chen Z; Tsou BH
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 May; 73(4):1082-95. PubMed ID: 21264740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cognitive load modulates attentional capture by color singletons during effortful visual search.
    Burnham BR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Sep; 135(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 20510910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reallocating attention during multiple object tracking.
    Ericson JM; Christensen JC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):831-40. PubMed ID: 22477020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speed and accuracy of accessing information in working memory: an individual differences investigation of focus switching.
    Unsworth N; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):616-30. PubMed ID: 18444760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Determining the capacity of time-based selection.
    Watson DG; Kunar MA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):350-66. PubMed ID: 22004197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Serial attention mechanisms in visual search: a direct behavioral demonstration.
    Bricolo E; Gianesini T; Fanini A; Bundesen C; Chelazzi L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Oct; 14(7):980-93. PubMed ID: 12419123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the generality of the contingent orienting hypothesis.
    Yeh SL; Liao HI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):157-65. PubMed ID: 18614130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The contents of visual working memory reduce uncertainty during visual search.
    Cosman JD; Vecera SP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 May; 73(4):996-1002. PubMed ID: 21287315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Representation of dynamic spatial configurations in visual short-term memory.
    Papenmeier F; Huff M; Schwan S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Feb; 74(2):397-415. PubMed ID: 22090188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Orienting attention in visual working memory reduces interference from memory probes.
    Makovski T; Sussman R; Jiang YV
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Mar; 34(2):369-80. PubMed ID: 18315412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Variations in the magnitude of attentional capture: testing a two-process model.
    Anderson BA; Folk CL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):342-52. PubMed ID: 20139450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do new objects capture attention?
    Franconeri SL; Hollingworth A; Simons DJ
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Apr; 16(4):275-81. PubMed ID: 15828974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Feature-based attention to unconscious shapes and colors.
    Schmidt F; Schmidt T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1480-94. PubMed ID: 20675795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of action on visual search: behavioral response toward stimuli modifies the selection process.
    Buttaccio DR; Hahn S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jul; 73(5):1453-66. PubMed ID: 21491163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How does target duration affect object substitution masking?
    Gellatly A; Pilling M; Carter W; Guest D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1267-79. PubMed ID: 20873938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mechanisms of priming of pop-out: Stored representations or feature-gain modulations?
    Lee H; Mozer MC; Vecera SP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jul; 71(5):1059-71. PubMed ID: 19525537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Space, object, and task selection.
    Lachter J; Remington RW; Ruthruff E
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jul; 71(5):995-1014. PubMed ID: 19525533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Irrelevant onsets cause inhibition of return regardless of attentional set.
    Schreij D; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1725-9. PubMed ID: 20952771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Working memory costs of task switching.
    Liefooghe B; Barrouillet P; Vandierendonck A; Camos V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):478-94. PubMed ID: 18444750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.