These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
28. The effect of perceptual load on attention-induced motion blindness: the efficiency of selective inhibition. Hay JL; Milders MM; Sahraie A; Niedeggen M J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):885-907. PubMed ID: 16846286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A static color discontinuity can capture spatial attention when the target is an abrupt-onset singleton. Burnham BR; Neely JH J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):831-41. PubMed ID: 18665729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Working memory capacity and the top-down control of visual search: Exploring the boundaries of "executive attention". Kane MJ; Poole BJ; Tuholski SW; Engle RW J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):749-77. PubMed ID: 16822145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Close encounters of the distracting kind: identifying the cause of visual tracking errors. Bae GY; Flombaum JI Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 May; 74(4):703-15. PubMed ID: 22215380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Focused spatial attention is independent of rapid resumption of an interrupted search. Lleras A; Enns JT Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Apr; 71(3):565-77. PubMed ID: 19304647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Redundancy effects of a moving distractor generated by alerting and orienting. Utochkin IS Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1825-30. PubMed ID: 19933565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Refining the dual-stage account of intertrial feature priming: does motor response or response feature matter? Yashar A; Lamy D Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2160-7. PubMed ID: 21769533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Visual marking and change blindness: moving occluders and transient masks neutralize shape changes to ignored objects. Watson DG; Kunar MA J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1391-405. PubMed ID: 20853998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Intertrial repetition facilitates selection in time: common mechanisms underlie spatial and temporal search. Yashar A; Lamy D Psychol Sci; 2010 Feb; 21(2):243-51. PubMed ID: 20424053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Spatial and visuospatial working memory tests predict performance in classic multiple-object tracking in young adults, but nonspatial measures of the executive do not. Trick LM; Mutreja R; Hunt K Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Feb; 74(2):300-11. PubMed ID: 22076680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Consolidation of multifeature items in visual working memory: central capacity requirements for visual consolidation. Stevanovski B; Jolicœur P Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 May; 73(4):1108-19. PubMed ID: 21327744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Complex dynamic scene perception: effects of attentional set on perceiving single and multiple event types. Sanocki T; Sulman N J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):381-98. PubMed ID: 23181683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]