These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22250913)

  • 1. Does delaying judgments of learning really improve the efficacy of study decisions? Not so much.
    Kimball DR; Smith TA; Muntean WJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jul; 38(4):923-54. PubMed ID: 22250913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of delaying judgments of learning on metacognitive accuracy: a meta-analytic review.
    Rhodes MG; Tauber SK
    Psychol Bull; 2011 Jan; 137(1):131-48. PubMed ID: 21219059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Monitoring memory errors: the influence of the veracity of retrieved information on the accuracy of judgements of learning.
    Rhodes MG; Tauber SK
    Memory; 2011 Nov; 19(8):853-70. PubMed ID: 21999219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Processing similarity does not improve metamemory: evidence against transfer-appropriate monitoring.
    Weaver CA; Kelemen WL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1058-65. PubMed ID: 14622046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measuring memory monitoring with judgements of retention (JORs).
    Tauber SK; Rhodes MG
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(7):1376-96. PubMed ID: 22524495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do delayed judgements of learning reduce metamemory illusions? A meta-analysis.
    Luna K; Martín-Luengo B; Albuquerque PB
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Jul; 71(7):1626-1636. PubMed ID: 28856962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recollection-based prospective metamemory judgments are more accurate than those based on confidence: judgments of remembering and knowing (JORKS).
    McCabe DP; Soderstrom NC
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Nov; 140(4):605-21. PubMed ID: 21707208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A revised methodology for research on metamemory: Pre-judgment Recall and Monitoring (PRAM).
    Nelson TO; Narens L; Dunlosky J
    Psychol Methods; 2004 Mar; 9(1):53-69. PubMed ID: 15053719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does ADHD in adults affect the relative accuracy of metamemory judgments?
    Knouse LE; Paradise MJ; Dunlosky J
    J Atten Disord; 2006 Nov; 10(2):160-70. PubMed ID: 17085626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Enhanced metamemory at delays: why do judgments of learning improve over time?
    Kelemen WL; Weaver CA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1997 Nov; 23(6):1394-409. PubMed ID: 9372607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Making Retrospective Confidence Judgments Improves Learners' Ability to Decide What Not to Study.
    Robey AM; Dougherty MR; Buttaccio DR
    Psychol Sci; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1683-1693. PubMed ID: 28934588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: the "Displaced-JOL effect".
    Bui Y; Pyc MA; Bailey H
    Memory; 2018 Jul; 26(6):771-783. PubMed ID: 29187067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Remedying the Metamemory Expectancy Illusion in Source Monitoring: Are there Effects on Restudy Choices and Source Memory?
    Schaper ML; Bayen UJ; Hey CV
    Metacogn Learn; 2023; 18(1):55-80. PubMed ID: 35968027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Metacognitive monitoring during criterion learning: when and why are judgments accurate?
    Pyc MA; Rawson KA; Aschenbrenner AJ
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Aug; 42(6):886-97. PubMed ID: 24643790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of divided attention on global judgment of learning accuracy.
    Barnes KA; Dougherty MR
    Am J Psychol; 2007; 120(3):347-59. PubMed ID: 17892083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Delaying judgments of learning affects memory, not metamemory.
    Kimball DR; Metcalfe J
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Sep; 31(6):918-29. PubMed ID: 14651299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accurate monitoring leads to effective control and greater learning of patient education materials.
    Rawson KA; O'Neil R; Dunlosky J
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2011 Sep; 17(3):288-302. PubMed ID: 21942317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The testing effect as a function of explicit testing instructions and judgments of learning.
    Jönsson FU; Hedner M; Olsson MJ
    Exp Psychol; 2012 Jan; 59(5):251-7. PubMed ID: 22580409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A model for stochastic drift in memory strength to account for judgments of learning.
    Sikström S; Jönsson F
    Psychol Rev; 2005 Oct; 112(4):932-50. PubMed ID: 16262474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do older adults show less confidence in their monitoring of learning?
    Serra MJ; Dunlosky J; Hertzog C
    Exp Aging Res; 2008; 34(4):379-91. PubMed ID: 18726751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.