BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22251269)

  • 1. Taxometric analysis as a general strategy for distinguishing categorical from dimensional latent structure.
    McGrath RE; Walters GD
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Jun; 17(2):284-93. PubMed ID: 22251269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Taxometrics, polytomous constructs, and the comparison curve fit index: a Monte Carlo analysis.
    Walters GD; McGrath RE; Knight RA
    Psychol Assess; 2010 Mar; 22(1):149-56. PubMed ID: 20230161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differentiating categorical and dimensional data with taxometric analysis: are two variables better than none?
    Ruscio J; Walters GD
    Psychol Assess; 2011 Jun; 23(2):287-99. PubMed ID: 21443362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using comparison data to differentiate categorical and dimensional data by examining factor score distributions: resolving the mode problem.
    Ruscio J; Walters GD
    Psychol Assess; 2009 Dec; 21(4):578-94. PubMed ID: 19947791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Taxometric investigation of depression: evidence of consistent latent structure across clinical and community samples.
    Slade T
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2007 May; 41(5):403-10. PubMed ID: 17464732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inferential errors in taxometric analyses of ordered three-class constructs.
    McGrath RE
    J Pers Assess; 2008 Jan; 90(1):11-25. PubMed ID: 18444091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Somatic symptom reporting has a dimensional latent structure: results from taxometric analyses.
    Jasper F; Hiller W; Rist F; Bailer J; Witthöft M
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2012 Aug; 121(3):725-38. PubMed ID: 22642842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is perfectionism categorical or dimensional? A taxometric analysis.
    Broman-Fulks JJ; Hill RW; Green BA
    J Pers Assess; 2008 Sep; 90(5):481-90. PubMed ID: 18704807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assigning cases to groups using taxometric results: an empirical comparison of classification techniques.
    Ruscio J
    Assessment; 2009 Mar; 16(1):55-70. PubMed ID: 18607008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of the predictive abilities of dimensional and categorical models of unipolar depression in the National Comorbidity Survey.
    Prisciandaro JJ; Roberts JE
    Psychol Med; 2009 Jul; 39(7):1087-96. PubMed ID: 18845012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing the relative fit of categorical and dimensional latent variable models using consistency tests.
    Ruscio J; Walters GD; Marcus DK; Kaczetow W
    Psychol Assess; 2010 Mar; 22(1):5-21. PubMed ID: 20230147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. To sum or not to sum: taxometric analysis with ordered categorical assessment items.
    Walters GD; Ruscio J
    Psychol Assess; 2009 Mar; 21(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 19290770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detecting latent taxa: Monte Carlo comparison of taxometric, mixture model, and clustering procedures.
    Cleland CM; Rothschild L; Haslam N
    Psychol Rep; 2000 Aug; 87(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 11026388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are exaggerated health complaints continuous or categorical? A taxometric analysis of the Health Problem Overstatement Scale.
    Walters GD; Berry DT; Lanyon RI; Murphy MP
    Psychol Assess; 2009 Jun; 21(2):219-26. PubMed ID: 19485676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Where do we draw the line? Assigning cases to subsamples for MAMBAC, MAXCOV, and MAXEIG taxometric analyses.
    Walters GD; Ruscio J
    Assessment; 2010 Sep; 17(3):321-33. PubMed ID: 20040726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk grouping versus risk continuum in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer: a taxometric test.
    Ingram DG; Kattan MW
    J Urol; 2010 Nov; 184(5):1937-41. PubMed ID: 20846685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Taxometric evidence for the dimensional structure of cluster-C, paranoid, and borderline personality disorders.
    Arntz A; Bernstein D; Gielen D; van Nieuwenhuyzen M; Penders K; Haslam N; Ruscio J
    J Pers Disord; 2009 Dec; 23(6):606-28. PubMed ID: 20001178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A taxometric investigation of the latent structure of eating disorders.
    Olatunji BO; Broman-Fulks JJ; Ciesielski BG; Zawilinski LL; Shewmaker S; Wall D
    Psychiatry Res; 2012 May; 197(1-2):97-102. PubMed ID: 22406392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The latent structure of depression among Chinese: A taxometric analysis in a nationwide urban sample.
    Guo F; Chen Z; Ren F
    Psych J; 2014 Dec; 3(4):234-44. PubMed ID: 26272115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The latent structure of anxiety sensitivity--revisited.
    Broman-Fulks JJ; Green BA; Olatunji BO; Berman ME; Arnau RC; Deacon BJ; Sawchuk CN
    Assessment; 2008 Jun; 15(2):188-203. PubMed ID: 18174312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.