These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22251283)

  • 1. Influence of abutment screw design and surface coating on the bending flexural strength of the implant set.
    Prado CJ; Neves FD; Soares CJ; Dantas KA; Dantas TS; Naves LZ
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr; 40(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 22251283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of abutment screw coating on implant preload.
    Park JK; Choi JU; Jeon YC; Choi KS; Jeong CM
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Aug; 19(6):458-64. PubMed ID: 20456024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implant abutment screw rotations and preloads for four different screw materials and surfaces.
    Martin WC; Woody RD; Miller BH; Miller AW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jul; 86(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 11458261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of engaging abutment position in implant-borne, screw-retained three-unit fixed cantilevered prostheses.
    Dogus SM; Kurtz KS; Watanabe I; Griggs JA
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jul; 20(5):348-54. PubMed ID: 21585587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An in vitro load evaluation of a conical implant system with 2 abutment designs and 3 different retaining-screw alloys.
    Erneklint C; Odman P; Ortengren U; Karlsson S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):733-7. PubMed ID: 17066634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of using a titanium washer on the removal torque of an abutment screw in the external connection type of dental implant.
    Jamiyandorj O; Kim S; Shim JS; Lee KW
    Implant Dent; 2012 Apr; 21(2):156-9. PubMed ID: 22391862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of preload values in gold and titanium dental implant retaining screws.
    Doolabh R; Dullabh HD; Sykes LM
    SADJ; 2014 Aug; 69(7):316-20. PubMed ID: 26548212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.
    Nguyen HQ; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):636-46. PubMed ID: 19885403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preloads generated with repeated tightening in three types of screws used in dental implant assemblies.
    Byrne D; Jacobs S; O'Connell B; Houston F; Claffey N
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):164-71. PubMed ID: 16681498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study.
    Foong JK; Judge RB; Palamara JE; Swain MV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 23684280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants.
    Hoyer SA; Stanford CM; Buranadham S; Fridrich T; Wagner J; Gratton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 11404760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Wear at the titanium-titanium and the titanium-zirconia implant-abutment interface: a comparative in vitro study.
    Stimmelmayr M; Edelhoff D; Güth JF; Erdelt K; Happe A; Beuer F
    Dent Mater; 2012 Dec; 28(12):1215-20. PubMed ID: 23021964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro assessment of three types of zirconia implant abutments under static load.
    Kim JS; Raigrodski AJ; Flinn BD; Rubenstein JE; Chung KH; Mancl LA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23566607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implant-abutment screw joint preload of 7 hex-top abutment systems.
    Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(3):367-77. PubMed ID: 11432656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections.
    Sailer I; Sailer T; Stawarczyk B; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):850-8. PubMed ID: 19865625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Probabilistic analysis of preload in the abutment screw of a dental implant complex.
    Guda T; Ross TA; Lang LA; Millwater HR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):183-93. PubMed ID: 18762030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Critical bending moment of implant-abutment screw joint interfaces: effect of torque levels and implant diameter.
    Tan BF; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):648-58. PubMed ID: 15508980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections after aging and chewing simulation.
    Truninger TC; Stawarczyk B; Leutert CR; Sailer TR; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jan; 23(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 21443610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fatigue resistance of two implant/abutment joint designs.
    Khraisat A; Stegaroiu R; Nomura S; Miyakawa O
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):604-10. PubMed ID: 12488853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of abutment screw preload on stress distribution in marginal bone.
    Khraisat A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):303-7. PubMed ID: 22442768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.